Being a history buff, I really made time to watch "El Presidente," about the President of the First Philippine Republic, Gen. Emilio Aguinaldo. It is about time that era in Philippine History was given a definitive movie rendition. I had high hopes about this film, since producer Laguna Gov. Jeorge "E.R." Ejercito (as Jeorge ER Estregan) gave us a very well-made biopic of gangster Asiong Salonga in last year's MMFF. It had not been easy to find time to watch since this film had a formidable running time of two hours and thirty minutes.
It was so annoying that into film. Gen. Emilio Aguinaldo (Estregan) and his generals were about to launch an attack to take over the town of Cavite Viejo. From there, it follows the life of Aguinaldo, from the events leading up to the declaration of Philippine Independence on June 12, 1898, to his capture in Palanan by the Americans, up to his death at the age of 94 in the year 1964. The battle scenes were very well shot with a huge cast of real extras playing the soldiers of all nationalities. There were some impressive close-up stop-motion special effects during the fight scenes, as we saw in films like "300" or "Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter".
The film did not shirk to tackle very controversial historical issues about Aguinaldo's role in the deaths of Andres Bonifacio and Antonio Luna. They did not hide the fact that all this was based on the memoirs of El Presidente himself, hence the probable bias in point of view. Now, what truly happened is still the bone of historical contentions. Bonifacio in particular was presented in a very negative light here. Montano's acting highlight as Bonifacio for me was his pained reaction to losing the vote for president at the Tejeros Assemby to his breakdown when someone protested his win as Secretary of the Interior. This scene alone was worth his Best Supporting Actor award. Too bad I did not get to watch the recent film biography of Andres Bonifacio entitled "Supremo" to see and compare its version of these same events. Antonio Luna was played by Christopher de Leon in his typical acting style. The script basically concentrated on his nasty temperament, not on his military prowess. But then again this was not a film about Gen. Luna anyway.
So, how was Estregan as Aguinaldo? Unfortunately, as with the problem of Estregan as Asiong Salonga the year before, he tends to be very melodramatic in his acting style. He indicates almost everything he says with some awkward gestures. There was a scene when Aguinaldo was exiled where Estregan silently pours out his emotions in unrealistically exaggerated bawling, accompanied by swelling dramatic music. If this was his attempt to add points to his quest to be best actor, someone should advise him that less is more when it comes to acting nowadays. It is also remarkable that every time the camera focuses on his face, he has skin so flawless that it radiates like a halo. That was some impressive special effect right there.
The huge name supporting cast was a veritable who's who of Filipino character actors. It was actually fun to try and identify all of them when they appear on screen playing all the revolutionary heroes we can think of and more. It can be amusing to see them in very fake- looking stiff hair and make-up though. There was everyone from the expected likes of Ronnie Lazaro, Sid Lucero, Allan Paule, John Regala, Joko Diaz, John Arcilla and Yul Servo, to the unexpected likes of Epi Quizon, Ian de Leon, Dennis Padilla, Will Devaughn and Bayani Agbayani. Baron Geisler is really quite stereotyped as an antagonist, and he really delivers the goods as a smirking Spanish officer, despite the puny mustache they made him wear. He was quite good in sword fights too. The only realistic Spaniard in my opinion was Ian Veneracion who did not need to don fake facial hair. Emilio Garcia, Gary Estrada and Wendell Ramos could have been realistic Spaniards but instead they play Filipinos.
There were only two female supporting roles. The first wife Hilaria, played by Cristine Reyes, was practically a silent role where all she had to do was look pretty, and die later without aging despite after having four kids. Much ado had been made about Ms. Nora Aunor playing Maria, his second wife. Unfortunately, this was such a bad case of miscasting. She looked ill at ease from her first scene as a shy young lady to her last scene as she lay in bed with Estregan as senior citizens. This last scene was woefully shot in such an ugly angle for Aunor that she looked unrecognizably bad. Too bad as that was an important scene about Aguinaldo's joy upon Macapagal's transfer of Independence Day celebrations from July 4 back to June 12. Oh yes, Sunshine Cruz also had a cameo as Gregoria de Jesus, and you can imagine that it was unrealistic.
Overall though, despite all the imperfections, I still think this was a very earnest film made with the very best of intentions, and obviously produced with generosity of budget. I commend Gov. E.R. Ejercito for taking on this huge project, as this is a story that needed to be told. Students nowadays can use this film to gain interest with the history of the Philippine Revolution as this movie brings all those historical characters to life, from Apolinario Mabini to Gregorio del Pilar. It is up to their teachers to guide them in those contentious issues, especially the events involving the iconic revered hero, Andres Bonifacio. This is a movie that will serve its purpose when it is watched critically and discussed afterwards.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
the president manipulated the truth through newspaper about the death of Juan Larreta (Andres's father) which then made Andres furious as he was the one who saw the truth. This gives a feeling of anger and sympathy as the reader visualizes himself in Andres's position. This make the reader think - how would it feel like to lose someone you are really close to, and read lies about the eye witnessed truth that his father was beaten, kicked and arrested by the CNI?…
- 1013 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
La historia oficial (The Official Story, 1985), about children whom the military kidnapped. These archival clips constitute a veritable anthology of how film, whenever possible, made reference to that time of intense…
- 813 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
El Señorío is a fun Peruvian restaurant that offers up many delectable delights. The establishment has a full bar where customers can grab a cold beer or a tasty mixed cocktail. El Señorío is wonderful for all ages and is accommodating of varying group sizes. It is also thought to be a wonderful locale for birthdays and other celebrations. When the weather is nice, there is outdoor seating available.…
- 122 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
After reading this book, I learned a lot about who Che Guevara was that I never knew about him before. More than just two men traveling South America, their trip inspired Guevara to become a man he didn't expect to be. No dry history lesson or travelogue, this biography is supported with the humor of Guevara's diaries, as the 23-year-old Ernesto - a frail asthmatic who had not yet taken the nickname Che - and the slightly older Alberto set off from Buenos Aires on a beat-up 1930's motorcycle that they name "La Ponderosa" (the Mighty One). At first, their adventures are amusing, with a stop for a visit by Ernesto's disapproving socialite girlfriend, who tries to talk him out of the trip. Things get more serious after the travelers cross the border into Chile - a country they're forced to flee after Ernesto flirts with a mechanic's wife, while La Ponderosa proves unequal to the snow of the Andes - scenes which unfold in a fairly unforgettable series of images, all of which I thought were beautiful and each as different and extreme as they get. Seeing this movie allowed us to see how the land of South America is unique in each and every part.…
- 811 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
It is important to understand the historical times of 1944 Spain in which this film occurs. Spain had ended its civil war fairly recently on March 28, 1939. The war was fought do to disputes over the internal government of Spain, separating the Spanish into the Nationalists and the Republicans (“Spanish Civil War Ends”). After many were killed in battle, the Nationalists won resulting in an authoritarian Spain (“Spanish Civil War Ends”).…
- 2735 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
He maltreats the villagers by taking advantage of the women and by openly abusing the others. From a historical perspective, this event is a major one. Spain had become weak from internal conflict and civil war. This war, fought to determine the next ascendant to the throne, hurt Spain greatly. As the peasants of Fuente Ovejuna were able to successfully murder Commander Fernán Gómez, one could see how the event symbolically illustrates the weakness of the kingdom.…
- 609 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
As Valenzuela tells the story, the main character’s coworker “[tries] to organize a strike to demand higher wages for unhealthy work” (Valenzuela 55). As this does contribute to the plot of the story, it also relates to Valenzuela’s life and the poor working conditions in Argentina. Following the attempt to rebel, the main character “[reports] him to his superiors and thus [gets] promoted” (57). This quote gives insight on how the government at the time worked; if you were against it, you were punished, but if you supported it, you were praised. Valenzuela finally states that “soon his work became so absorbing to him that his noble mission blurred in his mind” (67). Juan, the main character, became so caught up in his work to prevent the government from restraining him that he became oblivious to the fact that he had become a part of the political issue. Valenzuela clearly emphasizes her points about the government in order to reveal her perspective on Argentina’s troubled…
- 694 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
As most potential viewers know, this film is based on diaries and letters to home written by Ernesto "Che" Guevara during a motorcycle and foot tour of a significant portion of South America during the early 1950s, years before Guevara achieved international renown as a Communist and Latino revolutionary. Thus, the film functions as an attempt to get at the heart of the person who preceded the myth. The film is therefore difficult to judge as pure cinema. Is this, on its own merits, a great film? Or is it a great film about Che Guevara? Interestingly, the person I saw this film with knew absolutely nothing about the subject of the film before it started, and did not connect Ernesto Guevara with Che Guevara until very late in the film. Her reaction was interesting. Until she realized that it was about Che, she says that she considered it a decent but only slightly above average "road" picture, but it gained considerably in her estimation once she realized who the film was…
- 653 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
However, besides that small bit of glimmer of love, the movie is dark and hollow. This movie came to a disappointment for me though as I thought the plot of Ricardo himself overcastted the plot of Garcia Lorca, as he is only shown in flashbacks that were hard to follow. I wish I had learnt more of Garcia Lorca and his works in this film, but also the whole movie was generally well done with good performances and conclusion. I would not recommend this film if people are trying to find out more about the poet Federico Garcia…
- 512 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
El señor presidente is seen as one of the first “new novels” introduced in latin America which seeks to break from traditional realist novel and undertake a magical realist stylistic technique. Rene Prieto suggests Asturias “is one of the forefathers of the on-going literary revolution” (p.5) which proposes Asturias aims to expose the true reality of Latin American society, which deals with the struggles of political corruption during the dictatorship regime of Manuel Estrada Cabrera. Unlike a traditional novel which is more simplistic and “steers the reader towards a rather narrow and unambiguous interpretation of reality” (p.37) the novel confronts the issues within society such as poverty and totalitarian control and corruption through…
- 1445 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Since the beginning of time, there has been no balance between men and women. Men are meant to be strong and superior while women are supposed to be weak and submissive. These ideals have become long outdated and even toxic to both women and men. Feminism, in its true meaning, benefits all, not just women. It creates equality and deals with issues such as toxic masculinity. It matters today because it creates social equality that benefits women and men overall.…
- 492 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Shaw, Deborah. Contemporary Cinema of Latin America: 10 Key Films (London: Continuum, 2003), pp. 88-100.…
- 2378 Words
- 10 Pages
Better Essays -
The story/play was just amazing and the actors acted like a boss. I have been watching plays since I was in high school, so far this is the best play I have watched. Well, besides from that the content of the story is very interesting. So the play started with Santamaria’s family in Negros Oriental. The Santamria family has 3 sons, the eldest joined the guerilla movement, the youngest to the USAFFE, and the middle son to collaboration with the Japanese. In act 1 scene 1 the Santamarias Carlos and Amanda, their two sons Miguel and Franco and their daughters-in-law Isabel and Cristy-are enjoying New year’s Eve. In act 1 scene 2 the Japanese occupies Dumagute City which made the family terrified. Captain Haroda (Japanese) went to the house of the Santamarias to make an extraordinary demand. In Act 2 scene’s 1, 2, & 3 Farnco, Emilio, Cristy, & Marissa where involved in a crucial part of the story. In act 3 scene’s 1, 2, & 3 it’s the part where I saw my 1st real live kissing scene Hahaha, well no one expected that part to happen. In this part it’s where the brothers lost their brother due to war on because of the different groups they’ve joined. In this part allied forces won. The family rejoices-but things may never be the same again. Now there’s this question in the beginning that kept on ringing in my mind. “Who is a hero and who is a traitor”. Well its up for you to find out, you will need to watch it because its worth watching than telling you what happened in the…
- 284 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Grew up in a small island off the coast of Bohol, a place less rural and remote.…
- 774 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
This film served as an eye-opener to us all about the truth in our government. Our government is corrupt and always seeks power. A politician who is running for president tried to get hold of Juan by offering him luxury. This shows that a person will do anything for power. Juan left him when he saw his true colours. Another group leader who is also running for president treated him as a comrade and lets him speak for himself. Juan was overjoyed but ended up in disappointment when he found out that he, too, was only using him. Even people with noble intentions are blinded by power. This film is very meaningful and arouses a lot of questions within us. It used a lot of metaphors. At first, I was wondering why are there flying bicycles which can only exist in the future but the setting is from a past era. Then it came to me that maybe what the film is trying to inform us is that the situation happened in the past and still going to happen in the future. The film also expresses the power of the cinema when the camera got stuck in Juan’s arm. How it can be abused for power, money, advocacy and so on. Juan was disillusioned because although he fulfilled his destiny, he cannot do anything about the inevitability…
- 427 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays