To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In present days,more and more countries are putting big sporting events into national agenda due to a sporting explosion and their increasingly attentions towards multinational sports occupations.Meantime,issues are highly debated on whether such international sporting activities can ease the intensive atmospheres between competitive countries or not.Personally, I really appreciate the former idea for several reasons.
In general,popular sporting events contribute to harmonious relationships between the participated nations.To start with,communications between nations during the games enable them to be closer to others.Participation in the events promotes the development of friendshios and recongnition,which are acquired by sharing the exciting moments and cooperating with each other.Moreover,every joining country is likely to concentrate on the game during the competiton,which ,as a result,tend to pay less attention to deal with his enemies in the fields of politics or economy.It is true that countries can afford no distraction to pose threats to the security of other countries during the game.
Admittedly,sporting events may not function well to shoulder the responsibility for eliminating the contradiction between countries.The reason for this is that such events can make competitions even more intensive than before,provided that one country win another,which is coincidently its enemy.Obviously,the situation tends to be counterproductive,let alone the expectation of an improvement.Even so,it is unusual that such sort of thing happens frequently,as the game launched internationly is seen as a profile of promoting team spirit and paticipation.
In summary,I would concede that the sporting events cause worse problems in