Preview

Name and Discuss All the Sellers Obigations in Detail with Regards to a Contract of Sale. Your Discussion Should Include a Lenghty Discussion on the Sellers Liabiliy for Latent Defects.

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
519 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Name and Discuss All the Sellers Obigations in Detail with Regards to a Contract of Sale. Your Discussion Should Include a Lenghty Discussion on the Sellers Liabiliy for Latent Defects.
NAME AND DISCUSS ALL THE SELLERS OBIGATIONS IN DETAIL WITH REGARDS TO A CONTRACT OF SALE. YOUR DISCUSSION SHOULD INCLUDE A LENGHTY DISCUSSION ON THE SELLERS LIABILIY FOR LATENT DEFECTS.(25) OCT/NOC 2011
Contracts bring about certain rights and obligations. A contract is a legal bond between a seller and a purchaser. The purchaser has the right to claim performance and the seller has OBLIGATIONS to perform.
THE SELLERS OBLIGATIONS
1-THE SELLERS DUTY TO PROTECT
From the time of the conclusion of a contract of sale, the seller is obliged to take care of the merx until it is delivered. The seller is liable for breach of contract if the merx is destroyed. However if a third party is at fault, then the seller is not responsible.
2- THE SELLERS DUTY TO DELIVER
The seller is obliged to deliver the thing to the purchaser and give the purchaser full possession.
3- THE SELLERS LIABILITY FOR LATENT DEFECTS
The general principal is that the law imposes an obligation on every seller to assume responsibility for latent defects, even if the seller is unaware of the latent defects and even if the seller gave no guarantee.
The scope of the seller’s liability grants the purchaser the right to demand cancellation of the contract of sale due to the seriousness of the defect. The purchaser must also return everything received from the seller. The second option to the purchaser is to claim a reduction in price, which is calculated as the difference between the purchase price of the product and the actual value of the defective merx.
WAIVER AT THE TIME OF CONCLUSION OF THE AGREEMENT
The seller will not be liable for latent defects if the contract of sale excludes the seller’s liability for latent defects. (The well known voetstoots clause). However the seller will be liable if he conceals the defect to the purchaser and on the basis of misrepresentation.
LATENT DEFECTS IN REPAIRS
A contract of letting and hiring services is not the same as a contract of sale and is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alpha Electronic Components, Inc., ships 100,000 silicon chips to Beta E-Products Corporation. The chips arrive a week early, on a Friday that is extremely busy on Beta’s receiving dock. Beta’s dockworkers check the bill of lading against the quantity marked on the boxes, but do not exam­ine the chips. The chips are then put in the back of the warehouse until needed in the plant. The next week, when the chips are sent to the plant and unpacked, Beta’s plant manager discovers that the quality is less than that stated in the parties’ contract. Beta contacts Alpha to inform it of the defect. Does Beta have any remedies? If so, what are they? If not, why not?…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    25-1 If an entity sells its product but gives the buyer the right to return the product, revenue from the sales transaction shall be recognized at time of sale only if all of the following conditions are met:…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This became the basis of the bargain because she purchased the boat because of it. Sandra can therefore, bring a breach of express warranty, An Implied warranty of merchantability of goods is implied in a contract for their sale if the seller is a merchant with respect to goods of that kind. In order for the goods to be merchantable they must be fit for the ordinary purposes of which such goods are used. The implied warranty of merchantability applies to a seller of used goods as well but the warranty is not as expansive because it is used.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

     If Smith sues the dealer for breach of warranty and the dealer defends by relying on the contract disclaimer, what would be the result and why?…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For a manufacturer to be liable for consequential damages caused by a breach of warranty, the consequential damages must be foreseeable to the manufacturer.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    En1320 Unit 1 Research Paper 1

    • 27742 Words
    • 111 Pages

    extent permitted by applicable law: (1) Materials are made available "AS IS" and with all faults, Xilinx hereby DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES…

    • 27742 Words
    • 111 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    LP 5.1

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In UCC Article 2 Section 2-106 unless otherwise stated “contract” refer to the present or future sale of goods.…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. The Lemon Law says that the manufacturer is responsible for taking care of the defects.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The rule applies to sellers liable for defective products due to a flaw in he manufacturer, or due to a design defect failure to warn.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Yea Budyy

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Revocation of acceptance. The buyer had accepted the goods but could revoke acceptance if (1) the defects substantially impaired the value of the washers; and (2) the defect was not readily discoverable until after the sales to customers occurred. [Aetna Chemical Co. v. Spaulding & Kimball Co., 126 A. 582 (Vt.)]…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Yes, the seller should cure the nonconforming goods for the buyer. If the buyer accepts the sellers re-tempt to make another delivery because the nature of the circumstance, it would need to be done within the time for performance expires. (UCC 2-508; 2A-513)…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. Why has Cascade run into a quality problem, despite a sizable number of people performing the quality control function?…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Products Liability

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Privity under English common law does not apply to third party members who are not involved in the original agreement. It only covers the relationship between the parties in the contract agreement. This applies to consumers who purchase the product from a retailer who buys it from the manufacturer. Since the manufacturer is not a part of the original agreement, they are not liable for any damages that the consumer has about the defective product. They can only be liable if the consumer bought the goods from the manufacturer directly. If the consumers did not buy the goods directly from the manufacturer, then the manufacturer would be considered a third party. This is under the privity doctrine.…

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Product Liability

    • 2251 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Consumers use a variety of products on a daily basis to assist them in accomplishing a task or completing a project and they expect the product to be properly designed and safe to use. However, in the event that a product is defective and causes injury to the person using it, the manufacturer may be liable for the injury and have to compensate the injured person (s). Companies that manufacture products need to be sure they are doing all within their power to assemble products that are free of defects that could accidentally cause harm and cost the company. Product liability is the responsibility of manufacturers, distributors and sellers of products to the public, to deliver products free of defects which harm an individual or numerous persons and to make good on that responsibility if their products are defective (Product Liability, 2011). Products containing inherent defects that cause harm to a consumer of the product, or someone to whom the product was loaned or given, are the subjects of products liability suits (Product Liability Law). Products liability claims can be based on negligence, strict liability, or breach of warranty of fitness depending on the jurisdiction within which the claim is based. If a person(s) is injured while properly using a product that is defective, they have a right to file a claim against the company that would be titled a product liability lawsuit. However, in order to prevail on a product liability claim, the product complained of must be shown to be defective (Product Liability Law, 2011). A defective product causes injury or damage to a person or a person's property because of some defect in the product, its labeling or the manner in which the product was used. There are three types of product defects that incur liability in manufacturers and suppliers: design defects,…

    • 2251 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Limited Protected Speech

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages

    121). Many states have adopted the strict liability doctrine to determine product liability cases. Under strict liability, defendants can be determined liable despite following all necessary preparations from manufacturing to sale; this concept is known as liability without fault (Cheeseman, 2013, p. 121). Therefore, all parties in the supply chain of distribution are liable for any injury caused by the product. For example, a customer purchases a new stove from a local hardware store that has an unknown heating element defect. Later, the heating element catches fire, causing significant damage to the customer’s house. If the customer lives in a jurisdiction that recognizes strict liability that customers can sue any party of the chain of distribution, including the hardware store, manufacturer, and distributor. A defendant, who is not at fault, can later sue the negligent party of the chain of distribution to recover monetary rewards paid to the…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics