How were they alike? How were they different?
Napoleon Bonaparte and Otto von Bismarck affected not only the outlook of their own countries, but the outlook of Europe as a whole. These two men were solely responsible for their countries preeminence during their reign. Although, Bismarck was not the king of his country he seemingly ruled it. Bismarck and Napoleon compare through military success, dominance in Europe, and ruthlessness. The two men differ by military expansion, governing ideologies, and religion. The greatest accomplishments of the two had to be the successes of their military.
The reason for military action by both Napoleon and Bismarck was coherently to unify their countries. Bismarck however was trying to bring Prussia and the German states together as a whole. France was already one nation. Napoleon found that by military success through victories against Austria, Prussia, Russia, and Spain he strengthened France as a nation, which was not the case during the French Revolutions. Napoleon Bonaparte "was one of the greatest military commanders in history" (see http://www.lucidcafe.com/library/95aug/napoleon.html). Bismarck may have not been a commander but he was very skillful when it came to military conquest. He also succeeded in strengthening his country through the military successes in Schleswig, Austria, and France. Military success led way to the dominance of France, during Napoleons reign, and Germany, during Bismarck 's reign, in all of Europe. Another factor which both men compare to is, that both were very ruthless in the advancement of their countries interests.
Napoleon "joined a conspiracy that pulled down the Directory, the government he had earlier preserved" and became the First Consul (Civilization in the West, 662). Bismarck used illegal means and violence in the pursuit of a unified Germany. Both Bonaparte 's and Bismarck 's ruthlessness expanded beyond their own countries
through war. Napoleon inflicted horrors of war with his armies all over Europe. Bismarck on the other hand instigated wars for the sole reason of unifying Prussia and the German states, not because of any real turmoil between countries. As ruthless as both men were the difference was expansion after military success.
Napoleon steadfastly kept expanding his rule and influence all over Europe Whereas, Bismarck 's primary objective was to unify Germany. After that was accomplished he did not want to further expand his nation. Napoleon used military action as the backbone of the strength of France. He conquered countries than depleted their resources and established new rulers for French gain. Bismarck defeated Austria and France, but did not attempt to cripple or take over the countries. Governing ideologies and religious beliefs are where Napoleon and Bismarck differ as well.
Napoleons Empire was that of a dictatorship ran by a liberal government that fostered education, science, literature and the arts. Bismarck rule was under a constitutional Germany. "His position on constitutional issues and representative government" led to a more modern form of government as opposed to Napoleons dictatorship (see http://www.ohiou.edu/~Chastain/ac/bism.htm). Religion was another contrasting view of both. Napoleon realized the importance of religion in maintaining peace. He reestablished relations with the Catholic Church when he seized power. Bonaparte saw Catholicism as the religion of the French. Bismarck on the other hand backed German liberals in their antipapal campaigns. The campaigns were geared towards declaring the Catholic Church as the enemy of the German state. Views on religion differed profoundly, but seemingly religion did not affect Bismarck 's reign as Chancellor. Napoleon retrospectively relied on religion to maintain order.
Napoleon and Bismarck compare and differ in a lot of aspects concerning states business, foreign affairs, and military action. These two men have shaped the outlook of Europe profoundly. Two questions enter my mind when contemplating if these men would have not existed. Would France have continued into their revolutions or ever became dominant in Europe. Would Germany ever been unified as one whole nation? It is hard to answer these questions, but it is my belief that great men shape great futures and both countries would have not seen preeminence if these two individual were not there to guide their countries.
Works Cited
Chew, Robin. "Napoleon I Emperor of the French" Lucid Interactive Article
August, 1995 http://www.lucidcafe.com/library/95aug/napoleon.html
Hoffman, J.H. "Bismark, Otto von" Ohio.edu.
30 May, 1998 http://www.ohiou.edu/~Chastain/ac/bism.htm
Kishlansky, Mark, Geary, Patrick, and O 'Brien, Patricia. Civilization in the West.
Addison-Weasley Educational Publishers Inc., 2003
Cited: Chew, Robin. "Napoleon I Emperor of the French" Lucid Interactive Article August, 1995 http://www.lucidcafe.com/library/95aug/napoleon.html Hoffman, J.H. "Bismark, Otto von" Ohio.edu. 30 May, 1998 http://www.ohiou.edu/~Chastain/ac/bism.htm Kishlansky, Mark, Geary, Patrick, and O 'Brien, Patricia. Civilization in the West. Addison-Weasley Educational Publishers Inc., 2003
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
This experiment is to observe the significance of food safety. In addition, it will illustrate foodborne sicknesses and how food can be compromised by bacteria. This lab will culture washed and unwashed lettuce, as well as fresh unopened milk, and milk that has been opened for 7 days. The prediction for this lab, is that the unwashed lettuce and the opened milk will have the most bacteria growth. All results are meticulous within the expectations of the lab report.…
- 630 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
He had the King's approval, Bismarck would rule without the consent of parliament and without legal budget, it was a direct violation of the constitution. He'd twisted his speeches and told lies to achieve his goals. He could look like a modest spokesman or a devious and crafty politician who abused his power. He stirred up conflicts to start…
- 60 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Frederick the Great, along with his militaristic father, took Prussia from a dwindling spectator along the sidelines of European powers, and placed it on the top. Using his sheer militaristic nature, and the training and discipline of his army, Frederick the Great conquered many of the European armies. His actions lead to the development of the Prussian army. This army would have great influences all the way to World War I.…
- 438 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Political structure at that time led to Bismarck's success in war. With the untimely death of the Danish King, Christian…
- 1514 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
Bismarck had a new enemy; he had set his sights upon The SPD, the Socialists. Carr noted that “Socialism, like Catholicism had allegiances beyond the Nation state which Bismarck could neither understand nor tolerate.” The whole of Europe was already fearful of the events that took place within Paris, and even though the socialists were hastily quashed, they managed to overthrow a major European power albeit for a very short period of time. Socialism was on the rise in Germany, and Bismarck was unhappy with this as the current order was under threat. In order to attack the Socialists, Bismarck now needed to set up ties with a different political party on the spectrum and this was the Conservatives. Bismarck learned to a certain extent that he could not use his “Blood and Iron” approach like he did with the Catholics; he needed to take a much more subtle and less outright oppressive approach. As Germany was becoming more and more…
- 1949 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
Bismarck was successful in political control over Germany as he had created a new constitution which benefitted and suited his needs as chancellor as he had created an autocratic constitution which revolved around the Kaiser and himself. Bismarck’s success was due to numerous factors such as control over the Reichstag as Bismarck had manipulated the Reichstag so that he would be supported by the party with the majority. Thus proving that Bismarck’s political prowess was a force to be reckoned, with as he successfully and tactically negotiated deals which saw him “jumping into bed with the enemy”, meaning that Bismarck would remain the figurehead for political power ensuring a pre-eminent position for Prussia this is proven as 17/58 representatives in the Bundesrat were Prussian nationals.…
- 1104 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Napoleon Bonaparte was the first emperor of France from 1804 to 1814. He is famous for his efforts to form a connected Europe that France would lead. His career as a military and political leader led to many big accomplishments, but unfortunately he became too greedy over time leading to his exile.…
- 373 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Bismarck main objective was to bring together the German states and to form a powerful great German State; this is why he became the main architect in the German unification. To succeed in this difficult task he used Realpolitik. He was as incredible in dealing with foreign affaires as with domestic affaires. The success of the unification was tremendous but it resulted in a very complex state that future generation had difficulties to deal with. Napoleon was brilliant in domestic affaires, but he preferred to deal with foreign affaires, which he actually wasn't able to arrange well. "The irony in Napoleon's life was that he was much better suited for domestic policy, which basically bored him, than he was for foreign adventures, for which he lacked both the daring and the insight"(P.106 Kissinger). The way he handled foreign affairs brought France into a deep crisis. He finally stopped to reign and France couldn't cope with such problems he had established.…
- 2108 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
However, Prussia realized Germany’s vulnerability, seeing how its loose union and its central geographical spot in the continent made it vulnerable to attack from strong neighbors like France and Russia. So, Prussia set out to unify Germany to form one large, stronger state. However, this unification could not have been possible without Otto von Bismarck, a Prussian noble who had risen through the ranks to become a major political figure and the driving force behind German unification. The question is begged, however: how did Bismarck do it? How did he rise to power and unite these fragmented pieces into one union? Well, for one, Bismarck had connections. A noble by birth, Bismarck had high social standing, but no governmental or military background that would facilitate a career in politics. Nonetheless, he befriended two military generals by the names of Helmut von Moltke and Albrecht von Roon. Moltke and Roon, both cunning military minds and dedicated ideologues, rose up the Prussian power ladder. In 1859, Roon was appointed minister of war, allowing him a direct link to the king. A strong believer in Bismarck’s potential, Roon lobbied the king to appoint Bismarck to a high post. It was a success, and in September 1862, Bismarck was appointed minister-president. Now that Bismarck had reached high office, it was up to him to use his power wisely. This is where Bismarck’s political cunning comes into play. Soon after receiving his position, Bismarck began winning the king over. Within a short while, Bismarck…
- 416 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Hitler and Napoleon are arguably two of the most influential and powerful leaders in the history of mankind. They both had their times of glory, but both also had a very ugly side. At the end of this essay, I will compare and contrast the two, but before I can do that, we need to have a little background on them.…
- 1100 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
France was the home of one of the most brilliant war generals in history. Though originally an Italian noble, he took pride in being part of the French after they took over his home city of Corsica. At age ten he began attending a French military school. Through his hard work he rose to second lieutenant within a few years. His name is Napoleon Bonaparte.…
- 561 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
HIST 1301 – Midterm Study Guide Be prepared to answer the following essay questions. Be sure to include specific examples that support your thesis and conclusions. Your response to each essay must be at least 500 words in length. 1. A series of events and conditions existed in the Old World at the dawn of the fifteenth century that made New World exploration not only possible but also desirable.…
- 387 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Napoleon Bonaparte was a very successful leader. He was very intelligent, wise, powerful, and good with military tactics, good with ideas for all of France, and was a little power-hungry. He made some mistakes, but they didn't end up in the newspapers, and he was remembered all throughout history.…
- 149 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
They both were what shaped their ages with their power. Napoleon created a massive more mobile army than anyone else had in that time. In that time France had went through more revolutionary turmoil than anyone else. Which made the government corrupt and unorganized.…
- 639 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Bismarck sought to unite Germany by engaging into wars including the Danish War, the Austro-Prussian War, and finally the Franco-Prussian War. Many of Metternich’s and Bismarck’s goals resulted in their achievements. His most important legacy is the unification of Germany.…
- 1023 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays