Preview

National Security Agency Pros And Cons

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
263 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
National Security Agency Pros And Cons
A US government requests court has rejected endeavors by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) to stop mass accumulation of a large number of Americans' telephone records.

The second US Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan said on Thursday that Congress needed the National Security Agency (NSA) project to keep amid a six-month move period in the witness of another law produces results.

"An unexpected end to the project would be in opposition to the general population enthusiasm for viable observation of terrorist dangers, and Congress accordingly gave a 180-day move period," Circuit Judge Gerard Lynch composed for a three-judge board. "Considering the present situation, we will concede to that sensible choice."

In May, the requests court nullified the mass spying system as illicit and disregarding Americans' protection rights.
…show more content…
The ACLU tried to stop the reconnaissance before the dispatch of the new plan.

In any case, the second US Circuit Court contended that a sudden end to the present project would hurt people in general enthusiasm for viable observation of terrorist dangers.

The US mass spying system was initially unveiled in 2013 by NSA temporary worker Edward Snowden the office which brought it under cruel feedback both in the US and around the globe.

Snowden, who lives in Russia where he has been allowed refuge, has said that US government reconnaissance strategies far surpass those of an "Orwellian" state, alluding to George Orwell's exemplary novel "1984," which portrays a general public where individual protection is ceaselessly attacked by spy

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    On May 7, 2015 the Federal Court of Appeals in New York ruled that the National Security Agency's collection of American phone records in bulk is illegal. Specifically, they ruled that the practice did not fall under the scope of the USA Patriot Act, which allows wire tapping of individuals to detect and prevent terrorism. What is the USA Patriot Act? The USA Patriot Act is a 10-letter acronym for uniting and strengthening America by providing appropriate tools required to intercept and obstruct terrorism act of 2001. It was passed by Congress following the terrorist attacks of September 11 and signed into law by George W. Bush in 2001. Later when it was set to expire in 2011 Barack Obama renewed the law for another 4 years. The Patriot Act…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government bureaucracy rebuked Stellar Wind and the executive pushed to get the program in line with American law. In 2004 the Rasul v. Bush decision asserted that non-citizen enemy combatants in Guantanamo Bay could challenge their detention in federal court, thereby putting GTMO within the reach of federal jurisdiction. In the same year, Hamdi v. Rumsfeld authorized that the habeas petition can proceed for Hamdi and the U.S. government could not detain him indefinitely without due process of some kind. Despite these rulings and executive actions, the initial steps taken by members in the White House and the Office of Legal Counsel closely following the attacks on 9/11 were not guided by traditional interpretation of American law. Instead of refitting programs to tailor to American law, officials such as Yoo tailored the American law to fit contentious programs that dramatically diminished the U.S.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government has failed to identify any particular “authorized investigation”. While I believe the fight against terrorism is an important fight to fight, simply using that as a reason to collect this data is too broad. Additionally, I support Judge Lynch’s finding that Congress meant to exclude this broad collection of data, and that if he agreed with the government it would cause a reading out of the term “authorized investigation”.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Heritage Foundation, at a republican debate, tried to assert that the Patriot Act had stopped 42 terrorist plots since the events of 9/11. In fact, only about a third of their claimed plots had an arrest. Multiple plots would have worked if not for a simple mechanical mistake made by an inexperienced terrorist, as in the case of the failed shoe bomber Richard Reid and the Christmas Day underwear bomber (Swann). Earlier this year, the Inspector General at the Department of Justice, Michael E. Horowitz, admitted that, “agents we interviewed did not identify any major case developments that resulted from use of the records obtained in response to Section 215 orders”…

    • 1546 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Far on the other side of the fence, Sears and Osten suggest that the America Civil Liberties Union has actually weakened America. “One of the great myths of the twentieth century…is that the American Civil Liberties Union started out as a good, pro-American….When we look closely at the ACLU’s roots, the evidence shows something else. From the very start, the American Civil Liberties Union wanted to destroy from within the America our founders intended, with the use of lawyers and the courts as the chief weapons.” (7)…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2001, people are quick to dismiss the idea of an internment of American citizens, suggesting that the country has come a long way from 1942. The hypothesis that the government might conduct surveillance or use illegal wiretaps to monitor groups or individuals that it suspects of domestic terrorism seemed foreign before September 11th, and now has become a way to gain more information about potential suspects. These new measures, included in the USA Patriot Act, delicately trace the line between national security and civil liberties. A brief look at how the Bush…

    • 522 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Although the unconstitutional, albeit controversially legal and nearly-Orwellian programs were not a complete surprise, the extent and scope was staggering. The exposure was a big blow to the Americans and had them scrambling to understand the implications, contain…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Patriot Act Pros And Cons

    • 3614 Words
    • 15 Pages

    On October 26th, 2001, just 45 days after September 11th a panicked Congress passed, with little debate, the USA Patriot Act. The 342 page patriot act violates our 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th and 14th amendments, thus making it unconstitutional. I don't know why Congress passed this act, or how it got through the Supreme Court, but most people in Congress didn't even read the Patriot Act. I am sure that our founding fathers would not have wanted the Patriot Act. Just look at what Ben Franklin said, "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."…

    • 3614 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The National Defense Authorization Act greatly expands the power and scope of the federal government to fight the War on Terror, including codifying into law the indefinite detention of terrorism suspects without trial. Under the new law the US military has the power to carry out domestic anti-terrorism operations on US soil.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Patriot act essay 4

    • 1692 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Just 6 weeks after the attacks on 9/11, the Bush Administration put forth an act to help protect and ensure the United States from any further international terrorist attacks that may penetrate U.S. soil. Known as the PATRIOT ACT or “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism,” Act, It had been proposed and created with the wise intentions to find and intercept terrorists operating on American soil as well as protecting it on an international scale; yet, many Americans and citizens see fault within our government and the limitations of the patriot act of obstructions to our very own constitution set forth by our founding fathers.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001, many Americans were fearful of what the future held. Enacted as a response to those attacks, and as a way to re-instill a sense of security to the nation, American legislators worked to pass the USA Patriot Act of 2001. The Patriot Act appropriately made changes to other U.S. laws to combat terrorism, however it also established measures that may potentially hinder the rights of those it was designed to protect, sparking controversy regarding privacy and governmental power over the lives of private citizens.…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    NSA Pros And Cons

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages

    However the U. S. Constitution contains no actual right to privacy. The constitution only protects certain aspects of the individual.In the constitution certain amendments state only some things to be private not all. Some examples being, officials not being able to search your home without probable cause and no government involvement in making personal decisions. There is no actual right to overall privacy so the NSA has a right to go through different forms of communications in order to keep the people…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    USA Patriot Act

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In response to September 11, congress passed the USA Patriot Act which, by creating new laws, increased the goverments' power of surveillance, in the hope to aid in the prevention of future terrorist attacks. The ACLU believes that the USA Patriot Act challenges the law when it come to the protection of privacy for Americans, however, the USA Patriot Act instead, ensures the safety of the American people; and although it was one of the quickest pieces of legislation to be passed, it was an effort to counter terrorism.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Congress: No person thinks more of the security of our nation and the safety of its people than I do. The men and women of this powerful nation have protected it with their lives, and many have sacrificed their precious lives in order for us to have freedom. National security is important to the continuation of our freedom. But different people see the same subject in different light; therefore, I hope it won’t be thought disrespectful to propose an opinion that limits some of the hard-fought freedom. The character of the opinions are without reserve, and I will speak my sentiments freely. This is no time delay. The question before Congress is one at an awful moment in this country’s national security. I consider it nothing less than a question…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patriot Act

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A month in a half after 9/11 terrorist attack on the United States, the USA Patriot Act passed Congress, it 's also known as the “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism” Act, or more simply, the Patriot Act. The Patriot Act was created with the noble intention of finding and prosecuting international terrorists operating on American soil; however, the unfortunate consequences of the Act have been drastic.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays