National Security Secrecy: How The Limits Change

There are many of strategies for diminishing the injustices associated with surveillance. There are strategies at an individual level such as educating the public, engaging in civil disobedience, civil procedures, and guerilla tactics that can help one achieve justice. There are also strategies at an organizational level to help seek justice such as educating the public, civil actions in court, civil disobedience, and violence or threat of violence.
At an individual level, achieving justice is more challenging than at an organizational level but it still can be done. Individuals have a harder time achieving justice in the court room but it allows one to voice their opinion if they believe the Criminal Justice System has made an error. Working at the individual level is also challenge due to only being a one-person team and having to find a replacement. The challenge of being able to duplicate success elsewhere is also another down fall. But, working at the individual level allows a person to help educate the public from one view point and also make a creative protest without violence to voice their own opinion (Heil).
In an article, National Security Secrecy: How the Limits Change, “Steven Aftergood took on a strategy
Based off class discussion and research, a society cannot truly be just living in a total surveillance society. The United States currently has some of the common themes associated with a total surveillance society, but there are some components still missing. Every individual reserves the right to have privacy and live daily without an overwhelming fear that they are being watched. Over time, as technology keeps improving we will see an increase in the different types of surveillance. With improving technology, we will see an increase in physical control but not enough to switch our daily routines. There will always be the constant