What is your opinion on this issue? Justify your view in a short written report
In response to the September 11 attacks, section 107 of the Customs Act was put in place. In essence, Section 107 states that customs officers can now access airline passenger lists consisting of personal information, this information will also be placed in a database for the next 6 years.
As stated in Customs Act, Section 107
Amended section 107 of the Customs Act became effective on November 29, 2001. It replaced former sections 107 and 108. Section 107 provides strict prohibitions on the provision to others, allowing access to others, and the use of customs information.
My opinion on this issue is very definite as I am in unison with Elinor Caplan as he describes in the article “it fixed the gap.” Simply by stating this he meant that there was an obvious problem that the government had no knowledge of who was flying into Canada by commercial jetliner. I personally agree with The Minister of National Revenue and believe that Section 107 further protects Canadian citizens and is in the best interest for society. The change to the Customs Act helps the government foresee potential threats and problems that would be at hazard to Canada while also balancing privacy rights to Canadian citizens. It is a major investigative tool which has helped rescue children and thwarted armed criminals from entering. The fact that Canadian government obtains such information for 6 years is reasonable to the very least. As in the interest for the citizens, the government is only concerned with the information that shows any plausible threat. As stated, advance passenger information significantly increases our ability to track pedophiles, find criminals trying to enter our country, identify potential drug smugglers, and protect the health of Canadians. By obtaining passenger information in advance, it will provide customs officers with time to assess set individual and process large volumes of people more efficiently. Just having access to data helps Canadian government focus their attention and efforts to passengers who pose at high risk.
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is intended to foster values and recognized as an important part of Canadian society, which may also used to the contrary on this issue. Although these rights are set out to protect the dignity and liberty of a Canadian citizen in free society they must also be balanced in proportion to limit violation of basic rights in the slightest way possible. As George Radwanski states in the article “All this information will be stored not to provide you with any service but to have it handy if it ever becomes expedient to do so.” I do oppose to this statement. I oppose it mainly because it is a service for Canadians to provide higher security to them. Canadian government holds this information to protect the better of Canadian citizens but uses this information to also be used against you if found reason to. In the article Mr. Radwanski referred Section 107 to “Big Brother” which in my opinion is a complete exaggeration as this section only has to do with Canadian customs and not entirely with society. If he has any knowledge of Section 107 he would know it is disciplined with Canadian Customs and who is entering Canada. The aspect of “Big Brother” may be viewed adversely due to the fact that it describes an all powerful government body that keeps the population under strict control. The view of this term should be used positively as it monitors national security and the well being of Canadian citizens. There is only a certain degree in which information would be used against citizens if found threatening in anyway. I do not believe that the Canadian government has time to distress over the slightest amount of information that would not affect Canadian society as a whole.
e.g : If Canadian Customs has reason to believe you are smuggling drugs into Canada because you were charged with drug possession 4 years ago.
This is complete reason for Canadian Customs not to allow you into the country because of the simple fact that it is violation of law, it threatens society and is wrong, there is potential that such event may happen again.
e.g : You are a homosexual and going on vacation with your boyfriend, though you work in a catholic school.
This should be ignored as it does not threaten Canadian Society as a whole, but the views of the catholic faith. As the government does not need to consider such small complications.
The main objective of this act is to protect Canadians and to prevent potential September 11 events from ever occurring again, it reminded us that we are not immune to terrorism. Section 107 was immediately put in place so that these events do not happen. Countering terrorism and protecting Canada is a shared responsibility that should involve everybody. With this section put in place, Canadians can feel more secure, as we are working collaboratively for the greater good.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
In chapter three of the grade nine social studies textbook, there is an article named “No fly list.” This article explains how this bill violates the mobility rights. Citizens of Canada have the right to enter, leave and stay Canada at will. This bill gives CSIS the right to hold a citizen in Canada, if they suspect this…
- 774 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The recent September 11th attacks have caused many Americans to wonder about the personal sacrifices to be made in order to keep the nation "safe and free." With mixed results, it has become a common practice throughout history to restrict personal freedoms in the name of national security. Many questions arise from this process: Where is the line drawn? If liberties are restricted do they ever truly return? If it is true that we are doomed to repeat history if we fail to learn from it, an examination into the circumstances of the Japanese American internment in 1942 may inform the ways to most effectively deal with the security concerns faced by Americans today.…
- 522 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The House of Representatives passed the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 on October 24, 2001. This is also known as the USA Patriot Act. The Patriot Act was designed to deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world and to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools (USA Patriot Act, 2001). The events of September 11, 2001 led to the near unanimous support for the Patriot Act. In this paper, our learning team will discuss the many pros and cons of the Patriot Act of 2001.…
- 806 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
9/11 was a wake up call that the security needed to change. Ever since airports were created, both the airports and flight security have been an area of struggle and concern for the United States government. The government went to the Federal Aviation Administration and passed many bills to insure the safeness of airports and planes following the event of 9/11.The cooperation had regulation about bringing specific things onto your carry on and in your checked bag. People felt as though some of the regulation were unnecessary and overbearing. Before 9/11 an airport would not have as strict security, but would have some security. With the new security came new technology as well, the technology was good and bad. For example, some changes are that officers in the past did have to go thought the same precautions as they do now. Now people in the airport have to take their shoes, jewelry and anything that could be able to harm another person, or something you could store something illegal or outlawed in. But some people have a differnt opinions and feel that these new procaustion arent that bad, or even better. “I actually prefer to get body scanned versus a pat down. I find the body scan to be a little less personal”-Bruce Kornfeld The changes that all the airports made impacts the government's financial stand greatly. The amount of money the government…
- 962 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Prior to 9/11, America has increased dramatically with immigration reinforcement. One of the main goals for America was to prevent and detect for any terrorist behavior. America was determined to stop any another incident like 9/11 from happening ever again. The country developed more border security,racial profiling,and eliminated the immigration reform. Prior to 9/11, citizens of the United States didn’t have to show any legal documentation in order to enter the U.S. but after the attacks everyone was expected to have a legal document to get back into the country. The federal government is very informed about the who and what enters the country because most documents contain a RFID chip ,that contains information about the individual, is…
- 162 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
This Thesis will provide an overview of the controversial sections of the USA Patriot Act as it relates to the First Amendment, Fifth Amendment, Sixth Amendment and Eighth Amendments of the Constitution. In addition this Thesis will summarize the Controversial sections of the Military Authorization Act which goes into effect May, 3 2012. Both Acts appear to violate many of the basic principles that have been articulated in the U.S. Constitution, particularly within the Bill of Rights.…
- 14268 Words
- 58 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Ethics are “moral principles that govern behavior” (Oxford). The cornerstone of American democracy is offering inherent rights and freedom, but the term privacy must be evaluated. Recently, America has become a country that has drawn much unwanted attention to its government to due reports of the National Security Agency storing information gathered from people’s phones without letting the public know. Before going any further into research, it should be noted that as an American, there is certainly an inherited bias throughout the paper. This problem with the NSA has unearthed many feelings from the public and also politicians who either support or go against the storage of phone records. Since Edward Snowden released hard facts that the NSA was indeed storing phone records, people seem to either have a big problem with the bulk collection, or no problem at all (5). The NSA claims that colleting phone records is necessary in order to protect the world from possible terrorist threats, but civil libertarians say that because the government is not legally required to destroy the information once it has been collected, it is therefore an invasion of privacy (5). It is clear that in order to keep everyone safe, America not only has the right, but also the full responsibility of gathering intelligence in any way possible…
- 1343 Words
- 6 Pages
Best Essays -
After the attacks on 9/11 “With the goal of strengthening border security, the Bush Administration created the Department of Homeland Security in 2002, a cabinet-level office that merged 22 government agencies”(Green). Homeland security was put into place to ensure the safety of Americans after the attacks on September 11. This was a positive change in American culture because these changes gave Americans a sense of security instead of fear of another attack. Along with Homeland security, the transportation security act was also put into place because of 9/11. According to Green, “Created in the wake of the attacks, the TSA is tasked with instituting new security procedures and managing screening at every commercial airport checkpoint in the country”. The creation of tsa ensures all Americans that 9/11 will never happen again. Where some might find its procedures inconvenient it is a necessity to ensure the safety of everyone flying. Both of these programs ensure American citizens that an event like 9/11 will most likely never happen again. Because of these programs Americans can finally “sleep…
- 824 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Why do you believe this issue is so significant? (Include sources to back up your statements)…
- 562 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Bibliography: www.archives.gov The United States Constitution www.epic.org “USA Patriot Act Page” 10/24/2001 www.nolan chart.com The Patriot Act www.ushistory.org “The Electric Ben Franklin” copyright 1999 www.youtube.com Documentary Unconstitutional: The War on Civil Liberties 6/12/2007 David Cole and Jules Lobel- Are We Safe? Los Angeles Times: Opinion 11/18/2007…
- 592 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The officers have denied over 10,700 people in 2015 do to insufficient visa, criminal record or faulty information. (Nixon) Even with this criminals won’t be stopped. They find new ways to adapt, evade and hurt. Former presidential candidate Ralph Nader said “If there is a will there is a way, no amount of patting is going to uncover what terrorists want to hide” People will try whatever they can and patting them down, if anything it will make it worse, because terrorists try to hide these explosives in their body cavities to try to cause pain and suffering. And ultimately the TSA won’t fix this with scanners and pat…
- 750 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, a U.S. law called the Patriot Act was passed under the Bush administration. The goal of passing this law was to strengthen domestic security and broaden the powers of law-enforcement agencies with regards to identifying and stopping terrorists (Grabianowski). The privacy of the American public was first questioned in 2006 when USA Today reported that the NSA had “been secretly collecting the phone call records of tens of millions of Americans, using data provided by AT&T, Verizon and BellSouth” and was “using the data to analyze calling patterns in an effort to detect terrorist activity” (Greenwald). This article referred to a secret…
- 1205 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
When the founding fathers created the government of the United States, they wanted the government not to be so constricting with its rule. In other words, freedom, but freedom in its purest can be dangerous so they had to put some security to their newly made country. They did this by giving the executive branch the power to enforce laws and keep the peace. In the beginning, it was all good but things have changed throughout the years where security had to be increased. Now-a-days, some people think security has been increase to such a point that there isn’t fair anymore but that just isn’t the case. There is now terrorism in the world people live in and the Executive branch is taking the necessary precautions to stay safe. With the Obama Administration’s war on terror, the executive branch is taking the necessary precautions to keep the nation safe with drone attacks, warrantless wiretapping, and advanced interrogation techniques.…
- 583 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Apple should let the F.B.I unlock the phone used by Syed Rizwan Farook. It is very clear that protection outweighs our privacy. By unlocking this phone, vital information can be exposed, therefore preventing another destructive acts. Anyone who is considered an enemy deserves no right to privacy. What Apple is doing is almost as leaving a criminals biography unread, while trying to solve a terrorism case. According to the article, "The data on the phone could yield valuable intelligence, making its content a legitimate matter of national security." When you get right down to it, privacy is something we, as a society should ne willing to give up in order to gain better protection of our country. Dead or alive, the data on the criminals phone…
- 219 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Living a secured life is fundamental for each of the individuals. National Security was not a threat and will never be a threat to our freedoms. The criminals act against benevolence. If a nation is secured, it would be a total disaster for the grudgeful evils which would be profitable for the innocent souls, who just get to feel hurt or die with no reason....The nurturing buds, the mature flowers and the old trees; every being, from infancy to oldhood, needs defender to shield them. And, the National Security, with no doubt, acts as a refuge or a safeguard for the countrymen.…
- 445 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays