people.
people.
The defense presented examples of Native American schools that used the term “redskins” as a mascot or a phrase related to its sports programs. They also sought to prove that the term is a sign of respect and not a derogatory word. In regards to the linguistics experts, the defense presented claims that the word had been taken out of the common language and therefore did not correlate to a negative…
In the blog Not for Sport by Barbara Munson, the argument is presented that teams should not use “Indian” mascots. Using a statement and response dialogue Munson argues against what she feels are “common misunderstandings on this issue” (Munson 1). Munson uses ethos, pathos and logos with weak results. Munson’s target audience are the general population and more specifically communities with current “Indian” mascots and leaders in those communities.…
A Title IX-based decision to specifically eliminate a wrestling program cannot be based on a perceived decreased popularity of the sport among male teens. In fact, from 1981-2001, the number of high school wrestling teams had grown by 10% (Stanford Business Case: SPM-14, 2004). It is clearly a decision based on gender-ratio equality. According to the National Wrestling Coaching Associating, 378 two-year and four-year colleges have discontinued male programs since Title IX’s first year of existence in 1972 (Stanford). Under Title IX, the male/female ratio of athletes at an institution must be proportionate to the male/female ratio of undergraduate enrollment (Stanford). Many male non-revenue sports, Marquette wrestling for instance, were eliminated in order for universities to meet the requirements of Title IX. This unfortunate outcome is highly reminiscent of some of women’s athletic-related shortcomings and underrepresentation pre-Title IX. The United States Department of Education should therefore adjust the compliance parameters associated with Title IX objectives. For instance, football is a male sport requiring a relatively large roster and dedicated significant budget, potentially severely skewing Title IX objectives. As such, football should theoretically be exempt from all Title IX calculations.…
Initially, all actions that are made should be made with the best outcome, not demonstrated in trying to ban all mascots for teams and schools. In the cartoon “ Mascots” Phil Hands informs caucasians that mascots for teams and schools is wrong because we disrespect the culture and the Native Americans. The author refuses to take action. By making a school bill board discriminating Americans, Hands states, “It’s not meant to be offensive”. The author is representing how they feel towards caucasians. The action of the cartoon is virtue ethic, even though we use mascots for teams and schools we don’t disrespect Native Americans or their heritage. A school or team can use a Native American mascot as long as we don't disrespect them or their heritage.…
First of all, most Native American logos are meant to honor Indians and their tribes, not offend. Some evidence of this is in the article “The Use of Indian Mascots”, page 2 when it states “Max Osceola, the chief and general council president of the Seminole tribe of Florida, has stated that he regards it as honor to be associated with the university.” This proves that some feel honored by Indian mascots, so sports teams should be allowed to use these logos.…
In the summer of 2005, the NCAA banned the use of mascots that could be considered offensive to American Indians at any of their championship games. In order to understand this, it is important to consider that movies and television programs for years portrayed them as savage warriors that were feared and misunderstood. That is why some schools have chosen to use Indians as their mascot, a role typically played by wild animals or fictional beasts. You would not tolerate derogatory terms for other ethnic groups being used for school mascots. In the NCAA’s new ruling, they ask schools to eliminate mascots that may be hurtful or offensive to America’s Indian…
Daniel Snyder, the owner of the Washington Redskins, does not believe that the mascot is racist and will not agree to change the team’s mascot. He, and many other non-Native Americans, believe that the term “Redskin” is not offensive. They…
National Collegiate Athletic Association mentions that it has been a debate in America at least 30 years about the usage of Native Americans imagery as school or sports teams’ logos, nicknames, or mascots (Native American Mascots, 2008). There are over 3,000 sport teams from high school, college, and even professional…
This next year many communities might lose their spirit with in. With a simple swipe of a pen people will lose their past. The argument over the mascot name change of the Redskin. Many people of “Change the Mascot!” Campaign disagree with the “Redskin” name that it is a racial slur, and dishonoring there cultural background, although these schools have never dishonored the name but, support them, decorate their town in there colors, and mascot logo in respect we shouldn't change the name because they are taking away from the community's pride and tradition. To many communities the redskin isn't just there local grade school, high school, or college mascot but important symbol.…
Treaty is a formal agreement between two or more states in reference to peace, alliance, commerce, or other international relations. The formal document embodying such an international agreement. Treaties agreements negotiated between the US government and the Indian nation resulted in the Dakota people losing large portions of their land, the government illegally stole their land. And is after that when a series of treaties ware made with the Indians.…
It states, “Despite immense diversity in the size, geographic location, history, and educational specialties of the various colleges in America, most share one strikingly common feature: Eight of the ten most common nicknames for college sports teams are beasts of prey.” The list continues on with mascots such as the eagles, the tigers, and other various species found in the wilderness. Within the mix of all these wild animals, two mascots in particular stand out, those being, the warriors and the Indians. The author tries to make a valid point by showing these facts and statistics that proves society has deemed Native Americans as animals rather than people who share feelings and emotions alongside the rest of the world. In King’s letter he states that “oppressed people cannot remain oppressed forever”, meaning that eventually the people inferior to those superior will have to rise above and take a stand for what they believe in and what they chose to believe in. Fortunately, over the years society has been able to recognize African Americans more freely, and as a nation we’ve adapted to many of their skills and customs while on the other hand, Native Americans still face the issue of…
Sports teams at any level always have mascots. Mascots give fans something to cheer for. However, there is some controversy about some of the mascots. Some team names and mascots are related to Native Americans, such as The Cleveland Indians, Kansas City Chiefs, Washington Redskins, and the Florida State Seminoles. Some people will argue that these mascots are offensive, and others will say that they are just mascots. Sports teams should use Native American names and mascots because fans support these teams with pride, they don’t reflect poorly on Native Americans, and actual Native American tribes want to be named after sports teams.…
In 1998, Communities for Equality (CFE) filed a lawsuit against the Michigan High School Athletic Association (MHSAA) citing that they were not in compliance with Title IX and there was not equity between boys and girls sports in High School. Over nine years later in 2007, CFE had won their lawsuit, which made it all the way the Supreme Court and the MHSAA was forced to switch the season of the sports and tournament schedules to comply with Title IX and equity in interscholastic sports. The CFE vs. MHSAA ruling has had a negative effect on participation, officiating, and overall interest for the sports involved. Athletic Directors, along with the MHSAA have to find ways to increase interest for the sports. This study follows up with both positive and negative results of the ruling from various school athletic directors, high school coaches, college coaches and representatives from the MHSAA on a variety of issues that are involved with interscholastic sports. Possible solutions to the main concerns are answered in the conclusion of the study.…
Fryberg and Watts argue that American Indian mascots are harmful to actual American Indians, and that they should be gotten rid of. They argue that these inaccurate displays affect their mental health negatively, and make them not know who they and their people truly are. I agree that American Indian mascots should be thrown out because they are disrespectful cultural-appropriation and as it is actually hurting people, then it should not be allowed.…
First of all, it is offensive that sports teams use Native American names. A recent study by Washington post states that 6 out of 10 native Americans find it offensive that sport teams use Native American names. This it is about 3.12 million Native Americans compared to their population of 5.2 million people. Also, an article from Espn stated “Home means a lot in sports. Home field, home court, home ice. Home plate. Homestands and home openers. Batters slug home runs, running backs take it to the house, basketball players slam it home. We do swear to "Protect This House," in ads and pep talks, on signs and posters. It's a powerful concept. But it doesn't seem to apply to the 5.2 million people whose ancestors were here first”. Even, Barack Obama urged to the Washington’s NFL team name to change it name, “Redskins” because it causes offense to American Indians.…