Antoine Brown
Axia College of the University of Phoenix
Foundations of Criminal Justice CJA/ 303
Matthew Smith
November 10, 2008
What are Natural Crime and Legal Crime? A natural crime is an act in which the ethics of society finds a particular action to be offensive. This nature of crime is associated with Malum in se; a term that signifies crime that is considered wrong in and of it self (MojoLaw.com, 2008). Legal crime is an act that violates criminal law, a man made law and forced by the state. Legal crime is associated with malum prohibitum; a term applied to any action is criminalized strictly by statue and statutory law.
Crime is a definition of behavior that is conferred on some persons by others (Robinson, 2005). These crimes are some what of the same and may be view differently …show more content…
The definition of Natural Crime (Malum in se) and Legal Crime (Malum prohibitum) can be problematic. The reason why I state this is because, at this point there are very small amount of rules in a society that subsist on a natural point. On the other hand, any particular society has to have some sense of shared ethic, which, even in the deficiency of official law, would forbid certain behavior. The very end result to this is that more often than not, thing people of society consider being Natural Crime (Malum in se) is universally Legal Crime (Malum prohibitum). On the other hand, there are many acts that are Legal Crime, if not all, people of society would consider to be acceptable. The confusion of this issue is the fact that violating any law is Natural (Malum in se). This issue of act itself builds up lawlessness and weakens the power to act of the state to enforce laws. These two terms of crime are used to catergorized victimless crime or legal crime versus crimes that gives a clear and instantaneous danger to the individual or to the survival of a