Preview

Natural Law Theory

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
924 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Natural Law Theory
Natural Law is an absolute law that it sets the same laws for all people whenever, implying that everything has a meaning and a purpose leading into a good life. Natural law theory is basically Teleological, as it is aims at our eudemonia, violating it goes against human nature and is therefore immoral. Though all three philosopher's ideas are similar in connecting to life, but the main purpose and reason is different. Aristotle believed that natural law was set in humans contradicting Aquinas, that natural law is based on reason and God must have made human nature based on reason as well as contradicting Locke’s belief for human rights.
Aquinas’ theory of Natural Law, is based on moral laws sent by God, which applies in all situations at
…show more content…
Aquinas supported Aristotle’s idea of there being an efficient and final cause to everything that happens. He believed that God was the efficient cause for the existence of human nature. Aquinas believes that there are four main precepts of life given to us by God, to live, knowledge, procreation and social relations. These precepts are absolute because they apply the same for everybody in all situations and are written on our hearts. He believed that following the primary precepts will be pleasing to God. Aquinas believed that there is a Natural Law inside of everyone making human nature essentially good, however humans can sin because they may confuse real good with apparent good. For instance, when Osama Bin Laden attacked the two Towers he thought this way he is rescuing and defending Islam and this is the reason for what he did. Though killing is against all societies and Islam and Christianity, but people think they are acting for goodness. People are defining the goodness in their own perspective, not as a whole. In apposition real good is achieved with the right use of reason and it leads us to perfection for example, helping an elderly person to pass the road not caring about what people may think just caring about the eudemonia happiness of the elder person. It them feel good about …show more content…
Acting positively, yet for the wrong reasons is to perform a good exterior act but thinking of the motive behind the act. For instance, helping an elderly person across the road related to a great exterior act, however just to impress a friend relating it to the motive behind the act which is a bad exterior act. While the end that Aquinas’s values are to please God, Aristotle believes that the most ideal ways in which we act are leading us towards satisfaction toward the entire society. Moreover, it is human nature to attempt to impress others, but also in each person of us there is an intrinsic good.
In conclusion all the intrinsic goods by Aquinas relate to human nature and all of them are consequences of the other. Life depends on God’s reasoning of human existence without human there will be no life. Without procreation there won’t be human, without human there won’t be life which depends on the existence of both sex. In order of success of procreation each person has to love and respect the other. Respect comes from knowledge. Succeeding in gaining highest level of knowledge is to succeed in social relations without doing anything just to impress

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: Aquinas, St. T. 1265-1274, Summa Theologica. Publisher Not Applicable, reference is to general ideas, not a passage from a particular publication of the above…

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aquinas developed the Natural law Theory, with which he proposed five ‘telos’ that he believed were our duty to follow. His 5 primary precepts- ‘Worship God Ordered society, Reproduction, Learning and Defend the innocent’ are deontological. However, whilst being deontological, Natural Law does have some flexibility with the more teleological, secondary precepts.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    EssayThief123

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Aquinas assumed that all people seek to worship God, which many could perceive to be artificial instead of natural. From here he assumed that God created the world and Natural Law within it. These assumptions would not be natural ones for an Atheist to make. This is where the link between Aquinas and Aristotle come in. Aquinas introduced the five primary precepts as a way God intended for people to live whereas Aristotle said it is down to human reasoning. With this it is clear that being a Christian makes Natural Law much more accessible as there is a set guide to follow whereas with Aristotle the path can often become blurred and again, the assumption for everyone to be religious is not a natural one to make.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aquinas' main argument is well known as 'Aquinas' third way'; the argument from contingency and necessity. The first of Aquinas' ways was 'from motion,' this follows the idea that all objects move and a change of quality is movement. Nothing can move itself, which then leads to the idea of a chain of movement but the chain cannot be infinate, therfor there must be an unmoved mover to begin the chain. This first mover is God. The second of Aquinas' ways was 'from efficiant causes,' this follows the idea that all things are caused by something else because they cant cause themselves or they would exist before themselves. However this would mean that there cant be an infinite chain of causes, meaning there must be a 1st cause that caused all causes, then this 1st cause is God. The third of Aquinas' ways is 'from contingency and…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Aquinas proposes a number of laws that exist in the world. He believes that God is responsible for eternal law. Aquinas points out that eternal law the way the universe is structured. He understands that a rational being must exist, who is responsible for the structure of the universe, and that rational being must be God. This category of law applies to all things in the universe ranging from rocks to human beings. All of these things have natural tendencies that…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aquinas believed he had discovered, through his observation of nature, the correct path you had to take if you were to fulfil your purpose. To help others to follow this path he created 5 rules called the “5 Primary Principles” and if you followed them you where ensured a “good” life, this was called following the synderesis rule. The 1ST primary principle is to live, the 2nd primary principle is…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The age-old problem of the existence of evil and the question of free will is not just a modern-day exercise for theologians. Aquinas addressed these issues in his day and age and author Timothy Renick, in Aquinas for Armchair Theologians, provides a quite excellent explanation of how Aquinas attempted to answer the fore-mentioned issues. This paper will review Renick’s endeavor to enlighten us on how Thomas Aquinas’ answers to evil and free will are foundational to theology. The first question Renick addresses is the one of evil’s existence. To understand Aquinas, one must hold the Biblical account of Genesis as true.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Natural laws belief of sexual issues could be argued to be an effective theory to make sexual decisions. It gives you clear rules on what is right or wrong and there is no room for interpretation. Meaning that the theory is easy to follow and treats everybody as equal, everyone knows what the right thing to do in a situation is. However it is an idea that is very outdated. As culture changes so do the views and attitudes of people. So in times today homosexually and the use of contraception is alot more acceptable and happens more often. Aquinas' ideas are no longer a strict set of rules people feel they have to follow so in more modern days it is not seen as useful.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aquinas as a Neo-Platonist believes that existence is a good in itself, therefore, all things that improve existence are good. For humans our most important act of existence is the one that separates us from the animals around us, our ability to reason. As animals are not provisioned with morality, then our morality must be based on reason. Reason…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As defined by the Philosophical Dictionary, the Natural Law Theory is "In moral philosophy, a norm, custom, or set of beliefs shared by people living in different cultures or eras. Such a “law” is supposedly derived from Nature (via reason or some other natural human faculty) and is considered binding on all humans everywhere. Ancient Stoicism, for example, held that there are eternal laws that govern all human actions and that happiness depends on recognizing and living in harmony with these fundamental “laws of nature.” Similarly, Aquinas argued that God established a set of universal laws – ascertainable through reason alone (hence available to everyone, regardless of their religion) – that operate for the welfare and benefit of all creatures.”…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aquinas Vs Hobbes

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As a theologian, Aquinas believes the supreme good derives from the eternal God, rather than a worldview good. The Natural Law theory is central to his work because it connects Aristotle’s argument and harmonizes it with the Church teachings. Unlike Aristotle, Aquinas believed the city was a mean to reach the ultimate end, which is God’s will. In his broad conception of explaining laws human beings should obey, the most virtuous ones are derived from God, not from man. He articulates the principle of obedience and how each person is obligated to perform their duties to society. This also is a slight critic from Aristotle’s teaching. Aquinas stressed the significance of duties, rather than performing deeds. Even though both words are relative to preserving and protecting the city, the teaching of obligations solidity the expectations of moral…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the Treatise on Law, Aquinas concerns himself with the origins of law. He wants to know the source of the obligation that law imposes. The questions are these: “By what warrant does the human legislator bind the consciences of people? Doesn’t this power belong to God alone? If people possess it, what are the limits within which they may exercise it?”…

    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle believed that virtue is a habitual way of acting -- not an emotion or a capacity, and believed that there are intellectual virtues, about thinking, and moral virtues about character. He states that a virtuous act requires that we do the right thing knowingly and willingly and that we do the act for its own sake, not from an ulterior motive or reward.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Once the assertion is made that God is everything, Aquinas explains his feelings on natural law, which is derived from eternal law. Aquinas believed natural law is the human conscience which is controlled by reason telling us what is right and wrong. However, Aquinas also believes that the supernatural world was of the highest importance to man and if a person is commanded by God, it is not a violation of natural law. He believed that there were three distinct types of law given to us by Him: divine/eternal law, natural law, and positive/human law. He felt that these laws should be obeyed in that…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Although Aristotle did not use the term ‘natural law’ many medieval philosophers considered him as one of the first exponents of the fundamentals of natural law. Stoic philosophy was the first to introduce the term ‘natural law’ with the Stoics emphasising nature and the moral requirement to accept and conform to what is given in nature. This Greek philosophy spanned several centuries and greatly influenced the Roman philosopher Cicero. Cicero (d. 43BC) was a strong advocate of natural law and spoke of natural law as the innate power of reason to direct action. Catholic natural law theory was formulated by St. Thomas Aquinas over seven centuries ago. He identified one fundamental norm of natural law: do good and avoid evil. Doing good in this context is following reason’s lead to actualise human…

    • 2320 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays