Preview

Natural Law Weaknesses

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
576 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Natural Law Weaknesses
Natural Law | Strengths | Weaknesses | Rational – Natural Law uses practical reason, it is a common-sense approach. | Too simplistic - Humans do not have a single ‘fixed’ human nature. | God - Doesn’t require belief in God, as it is based on empirical observations of our nature. | God - Requires belief in God, as it relies on a God-given purpose | Objective – Natural Law gives us rules that are true independently of our individual thoughts and desires. | Outcomes - Leads to immoral outcomes e.g. not allowing contraception led to spread of AIDS and overpopulation in Africa | Purpose - The world has meaning, purpose and values. | Purpose - The idea of ‘purpose’ in nature can be explained by science (evolution and natural selection). | …show more content…
| Cultural Relativism - Neilsen questions the unchanging nature of Primary Precepts in Natural Law, using Cultural Relativism. Gareth Moore argues our nature is a product of culture and society. | Double Effect - gets around problems of conflicting secondary precepts. | Double Effect - brings in consequentialism through the back door. You are allowed to do some terrible things because of double effect, and at other times you can’t do really helpful things. | Instinctive - Natural Law’s rules are in line with our instincts and intuitions. | Agape - Jesus was opposed to legalism, and broke rules in order to do the most loving thing. | Virtues - Focuses on human virtues and excellence – the cardinal virtues of prudence, justice, temperance, fortitude, and theological virtues of faith, hope and charity | Too optimistic - It has a too optimistic view of human nature. Augustine disagrees (original sin), as does Calvin (total depravity). | Thriving - Helps humans achieve health, happiness, friendship etc. | Unholistic - Vardy/Grosh – Aquinas’ view of human nature is unholistic and over-simplified

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In this essay, I will discuss James Rachels’ article “The Challenge of Cultural Relativism”, in which he criticizes the normative cultural relativism argument which is about how different cultures have different moral codes, thus there is no single truth to define “truth” or a correct set of moral codes because the idea of right or wrong varies within cultures. Firstly I am going to explain what the cultural relativism argument is about and then present my assessment of Rachels’ critique regarding this argument from careful…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miss Sarah Nadwick

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Natural law is a rational theory, which doesn’t need you to believe in God to understand it. You could be a Darwinian atheist and believe in natural law derived by empirical observation, with the primary precept of survival - preservation of life. Furthermore, it is a clear-cut approach as it sets out an absolutist approach with a set of rules that everyone should follow if they aim to do what is good. The set of rules in natural law is the primary precepts. To further embellish these rules are the secondary precepts that help instruct and explain how to follow the primary precepts appropriately. This also means that it is easy to understand how to follow the rules so everyone in society is able to. For example, one of the primary precepts is Reproduction. If we did not have the secondary precept of what is acceptable and not in reproduction and how to look after your children then some immoral things could be seen as acceptable as they follow the primary precept.…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Doctrine of Double Effect

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The doctrine of double effect if often invoked to explain the permissibility of an action that causes a serious harm, such as the death of a human being, as a side effect of promoting good ends. It is claimed that sometimes it is permissible to cause such harm as a side effect of bringing about a good result even though it would not be permissible to cause such harm as a means to bringing about the same good end. The reasoning is summarized with the claim that sometimes it is permissible to bring about as merely foreseen side effect a harmful event that it would be impermissible to bring about intentionally (Uniacke 1984).…

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Law122 Final

    • 46388 Words
    • 186 Pages

    Consequences: we should promote good consequences, avoid bad ones, for all concerned, in the long run…

    • 46388 Words
    • 186 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lenn Goodman Analysis

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages

    ARE THERE UNIVERSAL MORAL REQUIREMENTS AND IS SOME MORALS UNIVESRALLY KNOWN AS WRONG? CHALLENGES TO RELATIVISM…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While MacKinnon (2012) listed some traits that we consider good in the people we admire as virtuous, e.g., generosity, kindness, patience, perseverance, and loyalty; she also argued that virtues “seems more personal” (MacKinnon, 2012, p. 125), since virtues demonstrates what kind…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cultural relativism, as defined by the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. “Is the thesis that a person’s culture strongly influences her modes of perception and thought” Most cultural relativists add to this definition saying that there is no standard of morality. This means that morality is relative to the particular society that one lives in. Prominent ethicist James Rachels has written against this view in his work titled The Challenge of Cultural Relativism. This paper will be focused on evaluating Rachels’ critique of cultural relativism, and whether it was right for him to endorse objective moral realism. Rachels defines this as “a standard that might be reasonably used in thinking about any social practice whatever. We may ask whether the practice promotes or hinders the welfare of people whose lives are affected by it.” That is the moral worth of an action is based upon how it contributes to the society from which it operates in.…

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As defined by the Philosophical Dictionary, the Natural Law Theory is "In moral philosophy, a norm, custom, or set of beliefs shared by people living in different cultures or eras. Such a “law” is supposedly derived from Nature (via reason or some other natural human faculty) and is considered binding on all humans everywhere. Ancient Stoicism, for example, held that there are eternal laws that govern all human actions and that happiness depends on recognizing and living in harmony with these fundamental “laws of nature.” Similarly, Aquinas argued that God established a set of universal laws – ascertainable through reason alone (hence available to everyone, regardless of their religion) – that operate for the welfare and benefit of all creatures.”…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethical relativism is a concept in which most simple minded individuals adhere to. According to definition in the chapter, ethical relativism is the normative theory that what is right is what the culture or individual says is right. Shaw argues that it is not very plausible to say that ethical relativism is determined by what a person thinks is right and wrong. He gives reason that it “collapses the distinction between thinking something is right and it’s actually being right.” Ethical relativism may be justified occasionally. William H. Shaw examines ethical relativism by providing comprehensive examples on why relativism is a weak method in gaining morals.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What one may believe is right and worthy in their own culture may seem taboo in another culture’s standards. This is because of the use of cultural relativism, which is the belief that something is good or wrong if and only if it is approved or disapproved in a given culture. Right and wrong values vary from society to society; therefore, there is no standard base to judge what is universally right or wrong between the different cultures. Because of this, societies may disagree about the morality of what is right and wrong. Gensler believes that if cultural relativism is true, then there are no right or wrong moral values within a culture’s belief, because objective truths can still exist.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cultural Relativism Essay

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This premise of cultural relativism shows prefigure of moral relativism. Moral relativism can be generally grouped into three categories; (1) descriptive moral relativism, (2) normative moral relativism, and (3) meta-ethical moral relativism. Descriptive relativism, according to Frankena, is the idea ‘that the basic ethical beliefs of different people and societies are different and even conflicting’ [1973:109]. The second form of ethical relativism conceives the idea that ‘what is really right or good in the one case is not so in another. Such a normative principle seems to violate the requirements of consistency and universalization’[1973:109]. The last among the three reveals that ‘there is no objectively valid, rational way of justifying one against another; consequently, two conflicting basic…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Music Censorship

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This will be the conclusion. This of demonstration of the impact as well as how the positive and negative effects affect people.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Natural Law – denotes a system of moral and ethical principles that are inherent in human nature and that people can discover through the us of their natural intelligence, or reason.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    philosophy

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages

    - Cultural Relativism seems intuitively true, but be aware that disagreement does not entail that there is not a correct answer to moral questions (p. 26-27)…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The idea of right and wrong varies from culture to culture. The five tenets of cultural relativism going to depth defining moral codes. Complications and moral questions arise when one culture begins harming another—Nazi genocide, war, imperialism, etc. Geographic boundaries blur in our technologically advanced, globalized world. The most daunting logical challenge presented by cultural relativism is it hinders a society from judging the codes or values of another society and even our own (Lecture 1).…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays