I CHOSE NURTURE BECAUSE PETERS ENVIRONMNETAL INFLUENCES HAVE SHOWED PETER THAT HAVING A TEMPER AND SLAMMING A DOOR IS WHAT YOU DO WHEN YOU ARE ANGRY. HE HAS LEARNED FROM HIS ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCE IN HIS FAMILY LIFE.…
One generalized controversial example of the nature vs. nurture debate, and how each side believes, is explained by Starr Kang, “according to someone who believes nature determines behavior, although a child may have had wonderful life experiences and a stellar upbringing, if he is genetically predisposed to violent behavior, no amount of good parenting can alter that.”(Kang, n.d.)…
The Nature versus Nurture debate has been ongoing for centuries. People have tried to gain power through knowledge in determining what causes the human “mind to tick.” For centuries leaders and scientists have performed unethical and immoral studies to determine why two people with similar genetic composition can come from similar backgrounds and turn out so differently. I have witnessed a person raised in a poor home by parents with drug addictions become a thriving contributable member of society. Unfortunately, I have also witnessed a person raised in a Christian home with a Father as a minister who ended up in prison. As we learn about the psychological and biological composition of human beings and the affecting environment, I am compelled to ask the following questions:…
The concept of Nature v. Nurture has been a psychological debate that initially began in 1871 by Sir Francis Galton. The debate consisted of the idea whether or not people have specific behavioral traits due to one’s lineage or rather the experiences one has in his/her lifetime. As the conflict carried on, a third view had birthed itself. This view mediated the two oppositions, saying this conflict should not be one at all. Rather than one side opposing the other, both sides together could be the answer to this prolonged debate. It is perceived that people are similar to their ancestry to a certain extent, then as they begin to live their lives more freely; their behaviors are later modified with their personal experiences.…
Are serial killers naturally, instinctive psychopaths or are they the result of a corrupt upbringing? Are you more at risk of becoming a smoker because of your genes or is it a result of the peers you socialize with? Now, these types of questions have instigated disputes among psychologists in determining who we are, whether it is a result of nature, such as heredity, or is it the outcome of the nurturing of one’s environment that shape our personality? In other words, were you born with a blank mind and over time you developed your characteristics or were you born with talents and characteristics since birth? Regarded as the oldest issue known in the field of psychology, nature versus nurture is and this debate centers on the question: How…
With nature versus nurture being a widely discussed debate it is easy to tie into different situations. "The debate within psychology is concerned with the extent to which aspects of behavior are a product of either inherited (i.e. genetic) or acquired (i.e. learned) characteristics” (McLeod).There is two sides to the debate nature…
Physical features, although unique in some measure, are proven to be acquired from the biological parents of any organism. The Nature v. Nurture debate relates to humans and how they develop their unique behavioral habits. Many who support the Nature Theory endorse essentially that a person’s intelligence, personality, aggression, and sexual orientation pertain primarily to their DNA stemmed from their biological parents (Powell). For example, if someone’s parents are depressed or violent, the Nature Theory supporters conclude that their offspring will also bear these negative these traits. However, the Nurture Theory presents that these behavioral aspects are originated predominantly from the environmental factors of our upbringing, which…
Behavioural genetic scholars purport that certain genetic traits such as low self-control and low empathy can be stimulated by an individual’s dysfunctional environment, thus exacerbating the probability of criminal behaviour (Coyne and Wright, 2015). In support of this notion, a twin study conducted by Christiansen cited in Mednick, Moffitt and Stack (1987 p.74) identified that there was consistently higher criminality in identical twins than in fraternal twins. Out of the 3586 male to male twin pairs, he found that identical twins made up the 52% of those concordant for criminality, whilst fraternal twins made up 22%. Thus, showing the correlation between genetics and shared environments as a determinant of the individuals’ behaviour. According to these findings it may be argued that the high likelihood of criminal behaviour between identical twins was due to them sharing all of their genes, whilst fraternal twins only share 50% of their genes (Coyne and Wright, 2015). In support to this notion, further research conducted by the University of Minnesota examined twins raised apart in unique environments, also showed similarities in personalities, antisocial behaviour and criminality despite the different social environments (Bouchard et al., 1990). It is therefore possible that genes rather than…
D1: Evaluate how nature and nurture may affect the physical, intellectual, emotional and social development for two life stages of an individual…
Nature vs nurture the nature nurture argument has been around since 1869, it is a term in psychology related to weather nature which is our genes we inherit from our parents (DNA) or is it nurture- the environment where we live that most impact on psychological development. Do we behave the way we do because it is imprinted in our DNA or is it our environment reflecting on our behaviour. Some scientist argue on the nature side, that your characteristics and personality are purely based on your genetic predispositions, then other scientist on the nurture side believe it comes from the environment we live and grow up in and through experience.…
Psychologists argue about whether a human’s development is more related to the environment (nature) or the people that surround a developing person (nurture). An example of the nature aspect of this debate is attributing a person’s affliction with a mental illness to genetics because that person’s mother or father was also afflicted with the same mental illness. An example of the nurture aspect of this debate is a person’s decision to live on the streets and join a gang because his family members and other people that he or she is surrounded by do the same. This is called the nature-nurture issue. Psychologists apply this debate concept to a person’s likeliness to develop a mental illness, the person’s intelligence level, and their personality type. I believe that people are influenced by both nature and nurture because people take developmental inspiration from their surroundings and their heredity also plays a role in a person’s life choices.…
A lot of people wonder where they get their freckles from, or their edgy and thrill seeking personality. This type of curiosity about where people get their traits from brings about the worldwide debate on nature vs. nurture. There are scientists who argue that people develop characteristics mainly based on their genetic makeup, and then their are people who say that environment and social interactions has more to do with a person’s traits than do genes. People often question why people are the way they are. Nature and Nurture often have a big impact on a person, and can help in explaining why they are a certain way. The nature vs. nurture debate encompasses a variety of major topics, leading to the idea that both nature and nurture influences people in their behaviors and decisions.…
The nature nurture debate has been one of the most contraversial debates since it was introduced in the 1870's by one of the first experimental psychologists Francis Galton. Since that time an increasing number of psychologists have become significantly interested in the nature nurture debate- like Galton they to have been trying to determine whether or not the way in which humans conduct themselves are inherited through their genes or if human kinds mannerisms are influenced by the enviroment in which they develop in.…
Over recent years the nature vs. nurture debate has been extensively discussed and researched. Should human characteristics such as intelligence, personality, behavior and ability be attributed to our genetics or our environment? One problem with this is how to pin a trait down to either an inherited or learned characteristic, or perhaps its both.…
Are you born with aggression or is aggression something that is learned from your surroundings? This debate it called Nature vs. Nurture. I believe that anger is something that is learned and something you pick up from watching people and things around you. I also believe you can take a situation that you are witnessing aggression and turn it around and learn from it so you don’t follow the same way. Aggression can be scary but it fixable and preventable. I believe that Nurturing is the reason for aggression.…