Nature Vs Nurture In Psychology Saul Mcleod Summary

The Saul McLeod author of the article “Nature vs. Nurture in Psychology” discusses characteristics people receive from nature and nurture also he discusses how they interact with each other. In the article he claims that nature and nurture equally gives us characteristics and researcher believes that they both interact with each other. The author supports Bandura’s social learning theory which states behavior can be learn by observing others and Skinner believe that language can be learn by shaping techniques. On the other hand, the author supports his claim that we also gain sufficient traits from nature by explicitly mentioning that color of eyes, straight or curly hair and certain disease are all a function of the genes we inherit. However, in my opinion we receive most
The scientist did experiment on identical twins to identify high intelligence arrives from nature or nurture. The findings from this study reveals a genetic component to intelligence. However, other psychologists believe that intelligence is shaped by a child’s developmental environment. My notes supports author claim about intelligence is influenced by both genetics and environmental factors. According to the article “Nature vs. Nurture in Psychology” it says “both nature and nurture are essential for any behavior, and it cannot be said that a particular behavior is genetic and another is environmental”. The author explicitly mentioning that nature and nurture is important for our behavior and it is very tough to separate them therefore a person can’t make assumptions that particular behavior is inherited from the gene or particular behavior is inherited from the environmental factor. This makes the nature versus nature concept complicating and the researchers are unable to come up with one conclusion that either nature or nurture affects our