Before losing the necklace, she is an unhappy and high-demanding woman who always cares for her outside appearance. She always keeps demanding more than what she currently has. Although her husband is not aristocrat, he still gives her a comfortable life; a life in which she doesn't have to work at all and a life with a servant waiting to serve. However, she doesn't want this comfortable life, she wants more than that. She wants a luxury life; a life, as she describes, with "the long salons fitted up with ancient silk," and a life with "delicate priceless furniture" (194). Certainly, her husband can't give her those. As a result, she suffers "ceaselessly" (194). Besides high demanding, she's also a jealous woman. She's always jealous to rich woman, who has what she wants and who she thinks she is supposed to be. Because of jealousy, she feels tortured, angered, and unhappy, as the author describes, whenever she sees her "poor" house, "worn-out chair," and the "ugly curtains", whose images she thinks rich women never have them in their mind (194). Also because of jealousy, she always feels lack of confident and ashamed to confront with rich women, even with her friend. As the consequence, she never feels happy and released in her life. When her husband brings home the invitation from the Minister, instead of feeling happy as a wife of a clerk would feel, she feels painful because she'll have to meet women who coat in expensive clothing and priceless jewelry. She thinks her life is full of unsatisfactory needs and unhappiness.
However, after losing the necklace, everything changes completely. From the materialist, she now becomes the realistic woman who realizes "the horrible existence of the needy" (199). She realizes that because of her high-demanding it takes her ten years of working to pay off her debt in addition to losing all of her property. Not only does she realize from her high demanding, she actually becomes a responsible women. When she realizes she lost the necklace, she doesn't even have the nerve to go look for it. Her husband has to do it all. Now, when she realizes that she has, as the author describes, the "dreadful debt" that she has to pay, she faces it by starting to work and dress normally like "a women of people", both of which she has never done before (199). She no longer feels tortured and angered when she can't have luxury dresses and jewelry. In addition, she is even more confident. Before losing the necklace, wearing normal dress to see her friend made her feel ashamed. However, after losing the necklace, she dresses normal clothing daily to meet people and her former rich friend once. She's also no longer boss woman who's only pointing finger at servant and waiting to be served. She has to do all servants' works now such as cleaning, washing, and cooking. She even has to fight for her life daily to get a real little money by "bargaining, insulting, and defending" (199). Although her life is physically worst than in the past, it's spiritually better now. She feels released after her tired workdays. Better than that, she now smiles with joy.
Losing the necklace turns Mme. Loisel into a better person, but what person would she become if she not lost the necklace? She would be more confirmed to herself that she was born to be, as she thinks, "beauty and charming" because "all of men looked at her, asked her name" when she walked in the party (199). Also, the diamond necklace made her become more attractive in the party; she would think she deserves to wear only luxury items. However, after going home, her reality will come back and tell her that she has nothing. No luxury jewelry, no beautiful expensive dress, and no one look and appreciate her beauty. She would be disappointed and start to blame her husband, who can't provide her those luxury items and who doesn't appreciate her beauty daily. Sooner or later, she would divorce him and find a new husband who can do so. When she finds one, she would not stop demanding. Instead, her demanding would increase infinitely. So, divorcing would happen again. Her life from that on would be full of disappointment and pain because no one would satisfy enough for integrated needs. Fortunately, it will not happen because she actually lost the necklace.
Although losing the necklace costs her plenty of working time and money, it helps her become better person instead. From her experience, we can that we should appreciate what we currently have. We should not over demand. Also, through her character, we should keep in mind that the true happiness can only find through hardworking.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The “Necklace” story is about greed, passion for more that what one can have. In this short story, French Writer Guy de Maupassant writes about Mathilde Loisel who is consumed with the desire to have everything that she cannot have. Despite the fact that she has a nice home and a great spouse, she is unsatisfied with everything in life. All she is a think about is riches and privileges that other people have. Her craving for riches is a steady torment and turmoil. Whenever she visits her rich friends she cannot help but overcome with desire to possess of these costly garments. Sometimes the desire even put her to tears. I think craving for these things is a way to complement for things she could not afford. She so obsessed of looking better…
- 231 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
In “The Necklace,” a female character, Mathilde, is living in Paris during the 19th century. She is poor, yet undyingly wishes she was wealthy. One day the woman is invited to a prestigious ball within her city. She immediately she contacts a rich friend and borrows a fabulous necklace. Once the night is all said and done and she returns from the ball, she realizes that the borrowed necklace is lost. She reacts by lying about the necklace and buying her friend a new one. With her financial situation the way it is she goes spiraling into debt and never recovers. Later, once Mathilde admits to her friend that she lost and replaced the necklace, it is revealed that the borrowed necklace was a fake worth very little.…
- 342 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Seeing the things she doesn’t have hurts her intensely. In the French version of the text it is said that “[s]he had a well-to-do friend, a classmate of convent-school days whom she would no longer go to see, simply because she would feel so distressed on returning home. And she would weep for entire days from vexation, regret, despair and anguish” (Maupassant 1). Her thirst for more bring emotional grief onto herself. Furthermore, the climax of her life, the product of all of her wanting, is short lived by the loss of the necklace. Her self pride as a higher class woman stops her from telling the truth and decides to buy a replacement for her friend forcing her to lose all her money and material belongings and begin to live in true poverty. The narrator then describes her complete loss of beauty, “[s]he had become the woman of impoverished households — strong and hard and rough. With frowsy hair, skirts askew, and red hands” (Maupassant 5). In fact, she has changed so much that her friend could not recognized her shown because when she greats her, the narrator states “The other astonished to be familiarly addressed by this plain goodwife, did not recognize her at all, and…
- 845 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Mme Lo(i)Se(l) It: Money Portrayed in “The Necklace” “Money is like a sixth sense, and you can’t make use of the other five without it” (Maugham). Mme Loisel thinks she is on the low end of the class because her husband is a ministry clerk. Throughout the story Mme Loisel continuously looks at what she has and thinks it’s not good enough. The short story “The Necklace”, by Guy De Maupassant is about greed, perception and how Mme Loisel doesn’t feel accepted unless she is to be depicted in a high class society.…
- 479 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In the beginning of “The Necklace”, Mathilde is not satisfied with her life, for she is stuck in a middle-class lifestyle when she desperately feels that she is “born for every delicacy and luxury.” (de Maupassant) In the nineteenth century, the wealthiest people commonly threw elegant balls, and invited many of their friends. If de Maupassant decided to have this…
- 179 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
In “The Necklace,” GUY DE MAUPASSANT character loisel Mathilde who is a very greedy and selfish woman, believes that she was born for every delicacy and luxury there is and feels that she was made for all beautiful jewels and clothes, which cause her emotional…
- 1277 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
After the party, Madame Loisel loses the necklace, resulting in tireless work, loans, and night jobs for her and her husband in order to pay back the equivalent of the price. The couple finally succeeds when all the money is paid ten years later, only for Mathilde to discover that the necklace was ironically a fake, and worth a very small percentage of what the couple paid. The theme of this story is that an overemphasis on material wealth can shrink the spirit and leave one open to the changeability of fortune. The situational irony highlights this moral because the Loisels would never have had to exhaust themselves if Madame Loisel wasn’t so obsessed with riches and wealth. From the very beginning of the story, she wastes her time dreaming of luxuries such as fine silks, beautiful furniture, and gourmet feasts. Even when she is at Madam Forestier’s house to try on necklaces to borrow, she is never satisfied until she has seen the very best. Madame Loisel’s preoccupation with appearance clouds her judgment as well. As soon as she realizes that she has lost the necklace, she should simply come clean to Madam Forestier. Instead, she is too concerned with how her reputation will be affected, so she keeps quiet. She later pays the price for this when she discovers that the necklace is “false [and]…worth five hundred francs at most.” The life that she gets instead as punishment during the ten years in debt is even more difficult and meager than her life to begin with, which stresses how fame and fortune is so fleeting and unimportant in the scheme of…
- 1345 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
In the story “The Necklace” the main character, Mathilda Losisel, is unhappily married to a clerk, and is ungrateful of the life she is living. She thinks that she deserves to be living a better lifestyle, and that materialistic objects and fancy things will make her happy rather than love. Mathilda is invited to the ball in the beginning of the story, and immediately she turns selfish and wants her husband to get the things she desires for her ball. Her husband tries everything he can to please his wife in every way that he could do to try to make her happy. Not once in the story did she say thank you for her husband’s efforts because she wasn’t thankful for what he had done for her. She also borrows an expensive necklace from one of her close friends. As she was partying away at the ball, she did not once think about her husband. She was more focused on the fact that other people were giving her attention. Later on in the story Mathilda loses the necklace, and her husband does everything he can to try to get it back. He ended up getting money to buy a brand new necklace, but had to pay off debts he had from raising that money by working it off and Mathilda has to work it off as well. Because of Mathilda’s greed and ignorance it had lead her to the situation of debt she was in. Throughout the story she only worried about herself rather than thinking about how much effort her husband was doing to making her happy. In the end the necklace turned out to…
- 1076 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In “The Necklace” Madame Loisel lost a necklace of her friends and bought another that looked just like it and gave to her friend that she borrowed it from Madame Forestier. Because Madame Loisel lied she was afraid that Madame Forestier would see that the necklace was not the same. It took her ten years to pay off the debt that she created and right after she had finished paying the debt it is ironic that she ran into Madame Forestier. Later Madame Loisel finds out that the jewels on the necklace were false and didn’t cost more than a thousand francs. If she had told her the truth she would not have wasted ten years of her life living in fear that Madame Forestier would figure that it is not the same necklace.…
- 332 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
She dreams of luxuries beyond her possession and pays a great debt due to that longing. In an attempt to please his wife her husband obtains an invitation to a fancy ball which she refuses to attend because she has nothing fitting in her eyes to wear. After having a gown made she ends up borrowing a diamond necklace from a wealthy friend to wear to the ball only to end up losing it by the end of the night. She ends up spending the next ten years doing menial work to repay the debt incurred to replace the necklace, only to find out in an ironic twist that the jewels were fake. As written in “The Explanation of “The Necklaceâ€:…
- 1118 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In “The Necklace”, Mathilde is seen as a poor woman who had low self-esteem and was married to a clerk. In this story, she was invited to a ball and borrowed a friend’s necklace. After the ball, Mathilde discovers that the necklace was lost. As a result, she had to search for a similar necklace and had to take out loans to make a purchase. She was forced to work for ten years to pay off the debt until one day when she saw her friend. Little did Mathilde know that the necklace she lost was worth much less than the new necklace she paid for.…
- 622 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The Necklace is a short story written in 1884 by a French author Guy de Maupassant. The story compares the class statuses of the rich and poor. Sympathy is created through the text, since the main character – Madame Matilde Loisel dreams of becoming a woman who is a part of the higher classed world. She lives in envy, jealousy, and depression. The author uses hyperbole, metaphor and repetition to show how much she wants to be wealthy and glamorous like the people who lives in the higher classed world. The writer also uses sematic field to emphasize her feelings, and leave the reader with a greater understanding of what the writer is trying to express. The moral in the story is to cherish and appreciate what you have, and don’t be so selfish. Also, don’t lie because things may turn out to be a lot worse.…
- 1174 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
What would you do if you lost an item that was worth a lot of value? In the story The Necklace Monsieur Loisel worked enough to get his wife an invitation to a party for the fancy which is mainly a lot of high class or important people. Monsieur’s wife Madame Loisel had always wanted to enjoy the life of the high class because she thought she deserved to live like them which led to some troubles in the story as Madame Loisel gathered enough money to buy a dress and had her friend buy her a fancy necklace. I believe that Monsieur Loisel is a believable character because he tried his best to help his wife and after she lost the expensive necklace he still stayed with her and worked for ten years to pay up for the debt that they had.…
- 442 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
One should be satisfied with anything good they have. In the short story “The Necklace”, written by Guy de Maupassant, Madame Loisel is unhappy with her life and always wants more. Madame Loisel feels that she should have been born for luxury. She wants to have all these expensive items, such as jewelry. Her husband surprises her by getting her an invitation to the Minister of Education and Madame Ramponneau.…
- 1070 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
“Sometimes losing something is the only way to show how important it was.” In the story The Necklace by Guy de Maupassant a girl names Mathidle borrows a necklace from a wealthy friend to wear to a dance, she ends up losing the necklace and spend the next 10 years working to pay it off. In the beginning of the story the necklace represented wealth and beauty but, at the end it represented sorrow and poverty.…
- 324 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays