Preview

Need of Electoral Reforms in India

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
532 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Need of Electoral Reforms in India
Despite occasional hiccups if the Indian democracy has acquired the image of a vigorous and vibrant form of government, it has also earned the sobriquet of a money and muscle-driven democracy. The reason behind is the electoral system of the country which is still hamstrung with certain crippling factors which make electoral reforms an utmost necessity. Though over the years, the Election Commission has accomplished commendable electoral reforms to fortify democracy and augment the even-handedness of elections, yet a lot is still needed to be done.

Criminalization of politics has marred the piousness of Indian democracy to a big extent. To control the entry of people with criminal background into politics, making false declaration in election affidavits should be declared a very serious offense and those who indulge in this should be barred from contesting elections for a minimum duration of 5 years. Any charge-sheeted persons be barred from entering any Legislative Assembly or Parliament. The membership of any sitting MP/MLA who is convicted later should be suspended.

Then the problem of excessive use of money power is one of the stumbling blocks which results in the flow of black money into elections and leaves candidates with limited resources handicapped. It can be addressed by fixing the ceiling of election expenditure to a reasonable extent. Also, the money spent by the candidates in their election campaign should also be made public. Stare funding of elections can also be a better option as it can ensure level playing field for all the candidates.
A first-past-the-post (abbreviated FPTP or FPP) election is one that is won by the candidate(s) with the most votes. The winning candidate does not necessarily receive an absolute majority of all votes cast.
One of the most important reforms could be the replacing of First Past The Post electoral system with Proportionate Representation System. The First Past The Post (FPTP) system allows political

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Additional Member System gives voters more choice and better representation than does First Past the Post. Discuss.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another criticism is that there are many wasted votes when using this system. To revert back to the UKIP example, nearly one million votes were wasted on UKIP, who didn’t win a single seat, perhaps leading the voters to think that their votes are useless and have no effect. This could be the reason for the continually decreasing turnout at the general elections. Another reason for people not turning out to votes is the ‘safe seats’. It is estimated that there are around 500 ‘safe’ seats within the UK, meaning that the same party will always win a seat in those constituencies. Voters in this area resultantly are less likely to vote as they know their vote is unimportant and will not affect the overall outcome. Thus, we can see that if one is going to look at proportionality, FPTP is not fair.…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The current system under the Westminster elections is first-past-the-post. This is a majoritarial system in that winner-takes-all. Those who are in favour of PR argue that the FPTP system is under-representative towards minor parties and votes are then typically ‘wasted’. However those who are in favour of the FPTP system point out that it leads to a strong government, a clear outcome and keeps extremist at bay. Proportional representation is a institution of different electoral systems that produces a government based on the votes of the electorate and is proportion to the seats that the party receives. This system is different to the current Westminster formula in that the percentage of votes gained is the same as the percentage of seats received.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The FPTP system firstly creates a strong government as it greatly reduces the risk of coalition governments. Single party governments are strong as they have a majority of seats within the House of Commons which means it is easy for the party to pass legislation and make decisions. As the winning party in an election only needs a plurality of votes to win constituencies and so gain a majority in the House of Commons, it is easy for a single party to gain substantial political power. Coalition governments are however, weak and ineffective as there are two parties conflicting desires to be weighed up, this means that the passing of legislation can take a long time and mean that some parties may not get what they had wished to carry out in their manifesto, which will lose them popularity with the public. In FPTP there have only been two coalitions in the last 70 years, which shows its ability to create majority party governments, this means that generally the party with the best policies (in the voter’s eyes) will be able to pass these…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Module 13 Vocabulary

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages

    19. Proportional representation- The most popular electoral system alternative to a “winner take all” kind of election, this is when there has to be a strong relation between the amount of votes a party has and the amount of parliamentary seats a party wins in order for them to take office.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition, another reason why FPTP should continue to be used for elections in the House of Commons is because it usually produces a strong, single party majority government. This is seen as advantageous because legislation can be passed easily as governments that have been elected will have legitimacy and authority in implementing policies and legislation. Due to the winner’s bonus, the FPTP’s single plurality system usually produces a single party majority government who therefore do not need much support from other parties in order to pass its proposed legislation. For example, the labour party governed with a majority of 413 out of 659 seats in…

    • 1158 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fttp Pros And Cons

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When more responsibility is put into the hands of the voters. the political pressure caused by the FTTP system will be relieved. Enabling voters to feel that their vote counts, and that they are better represented in their government. This change would also affect how the electoral college works. By not associating a whole state with one political party, but by giving more accurate representation of the people. Should the united states adopt this proportional system support of national government will increase and produce a better voter turnout in…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Additional Member System

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There are two main electoral systems to discuss, first is the AMS (Additional Member System) and second is FPTP (First-Past-The-Post System). In general, there has been a view that considers AMS as the greater choice as an electoral system. The first point is, AMS is more responsible to the will of the people due to its hybrid system. A proportion of seats in the legislative assembly are elected using FPTP while a small number of representatives—additional member—are elected in multi-member constituencies. For example, in the 2011 Scottish Parliamentary elections, 56 members of the Scottish Parliament (43%) and 20 members of the Welsh Assembly (33%) are elected in this way1.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fptp Pros And Cons

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages

    One major advantage of FPTP system is that it excludes extremist parties from gaining seats within the House of Commons; as a result of, most of the extremist parties have support in concentrated geographical locations . FPTP allows more immediate/direct communication of complaints, and ideas, brought to the House of Commons by your MP representative. These members of parliament act as messengers to the Prime Minster, just as the Governor General is the messenger to the queen . Finally, FPTP is a simple system that everyone can understand, or easily come to learn. A valid vote consists of one check mark beside your candidate, and is very easy for the electoral officials to tally…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First past the post is the electoral system in place in the UK. It works to the advantage of some parties, however it also hinders others greatly. It usually a quick process going from voting one day and the elected party being announced shortly after. This however was not the case in the 2010 election. However it is a system guilty of many wasted votes. It is a very evenly balanced system of pros and cons.…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First Past the Post is the voting system used in General elections in the UK. It has many advantages, like the fact that it provides a clear view of the parties that can be voted for, such as Liberal Democrats, Labour, and Conservative, among others. It usually allows Single party governments, and rarely ends up in hung, or coalition governments, such as the likes that we are in at the moment. It also prevents extremist parties such as BNP from having a large say in government, as a party much have at least 5% of votes to do this. It also allows voters to choose between people rather than just the parties, and it gives a chance for popular independent candidates to be elected. Last but not least, it is also by far the simplest voting system around, which is mainly why it is so popular- it only requires one vote for the party of your choice, one tick and it is done.…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the coming of electronic voting machines (EVMs), it was not even possible for voters to invalidate their votes by scratching out ballots or voting for two candidates. The only way to ensure that the vote is not wasted on an undeserving candidate was to not participate in the elections. As a result, Indian democracy has suffered from lower voting turnouts and growing dissatisfaction with the quality of candidates contesting elections. In the 2009 general elections, only 58% of registered voters cast their ballots, as against a high of 63% a quarter of a century ago. However, Indian voters going to the polls now have a new choice available to them: “none of the above (NOTA)”. The voters will not have to stand out of elections or invalidate their votes, or…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plurality Voting System

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Liberal party’s recent promise to change the electoral system is one that is quite overdue. Yet after years of the plurality voting system (also known as the “first-past-the-post” or “FPP”) taken from the United Kingdom’s parliament, some think that the system should stay. Supporters say the system is easy to understand, ballots are easily counted, and parties have to appeal to the centrists to win elections, so it discourages political extremism. However, with voter turnout numbers shrinking with the two main parties and with minority governments becoming the norm year after year, change is needed in order to restore Canada’s democracy. Therefore, it is imperative that the FPP system changes because of the associated problems of minority rule, an eventual two-party system, and spoiler effect.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    New Electoral System

    • 198 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Electoral College election system has been a part of the United States for over 200 years, and continues to be the primary voting method in electing the most powerful office of the nation. At this point in time, process such as electoral college is unsuitable, and irreconcilable for any democratic country, including the United States, as it disregards the preference of a large number of citizens. In the article, “The Rules of the Game: A New Electoral System”, economists Amartya Sen and Eric Maskin proposes number of alternatives, such as National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, and The Condorcet Method. For an improved democratic practice, both options can be applied to the election process of the United States. While using the NPVIC…

    • 198 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The UK electoral system is run by the First Past the Post system, voting takes place in single-member constituencies. Voters put a cross in a box next to their favoured candidate and the candidate with the most votes in the constituency wins. The advantages of using a First Past the Post system are as follows: Firstly, the system is simple and easy for constituents to understand because you only have one box to tick. By having to only tick one box, voters can clearly express which party they would prefer to form a government. Also, having had this system for a long time now ensures that the public have confidence in this system and if the system was changed to be any further complex this could run the risk of reducing turnout at elections and the general election turnout is low already at 65% in 2010. In addition to this, it makes it easier to count the votes so the turnaround on the results is in hours rather than using a Proportional Representation system which would take days to process results.…

    • 1044 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays