Though "everyone knew that a heavy majority of the Kansas settlers were antislavery", the proslavery crowd made a tough fight. The reason for the struggle mainly rested on Buchanan's shoulders. The Kansas-Nebraska Act resolved for popular sovereignty, and its author, Stephen A. Douglas, wanted to take all measures to ensure this. He convinced Buchanan to appoint Robert J. Walker as governor of Kansas, with orders that "the constitution be laid before the people". When the people of Kansas rejected the Lecompton Constitution, a proslavery constitution, Buchanan still tried to ram it down the congress's throat. He upheld it as long as possible, giving the southern proslaveryites time to gain "fresh strength".
Nevin's subtitle states, "If Buchanan had met the Kansas Problem firmly we might avoided the civil war". The reasoning for this is that he could have halted the quarrels before anything really intensified. The proslavery forces were weak and if Buchanan would have put his fist down early than America could have evaded the Civil War. It is for this role that Buchanan can be "counted one of the signal failures of American statesmanship".
James Buchanan's indecisiveness brought forth other "aftereffects" as well. It paved the way for the Republic party, "which preceded and facilitated the disruption of the nation". It also brought forth civil war in Kansas, which eventually would spread to the entire country. The nation made its "greatest mistake" when it elected "a man so pliable" that would "palter with a clean-cut and momentous issue".
Just as "Uncle Tom's Cabin" had inspired abolitionists and Northerners, Buchanan's indecisiveness had excited the Southerners and the proslaveryites. Had Buchanan acted sooner he could have "grappled with disunion when it was yet weak and unprepared". Though the south lost the fight for slavery in Kansas, they gained strength and boldness, thanks in large part to the indecisive procrastinator, President James Buchanan
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
During the spring of 1862, angry men who opposed Matt Creighton’s son, Bill, burned down his barn. Now, the majority of people thought this was unjust and cruel; however, others think it was the right thing to do. Matt Creighton’s barn should not have burned down. Matt is currently sick and can barely do daily tasks such as cleaning or feeding the animals. On top of that, his barn is now gone and has to be rebuilt. What has this man done that was so evil that this accident has happened to him? Did this all happen just because one of his children is in the Confederate army? Matt has many boys serving in in Union army and one died for the Union. Just because one son is in the Confederate army does not mean that Matt is a bad man…
- 231 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Lincoln entered the Presidency rooted in the beliefs that the executive branch’s power came second to the legislative, as stated in the Constitution. His “immediate predecessors—Democrats Franklin Pierce and James Buchanan—had set the pattern for a weak executive, conceiving their roles as little more than clerks...who either approved or disapproved legislation developed from Congress’s agenda,” (Brinkley and Dyer, 2004, 175). However, following the secession of seven southern states immediately after Lincoln’s election, his focus became reuniting the union: “he sought to reassure his fellow countrymen and to prevent more states from seceding,” (Brinkley and Dyer, 2004, 175). To accomplish this, Lincoln was headfast in his decisions, often reaching beyond traditional executive power and, in effect, overriding the other branches of government. These decisions were extremely controversial: Groiler Encyclopedia says, “As a commander in chief Lincoln was soon noted for vigorous…
- 1999 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Could you imagine being the president of the United States during the Civil War? Imagine how hard it would have been to have blood on your hands, because every decision you made, would have still led to war. These were some of the thoughts going through president Lincoln's head as he gave his second inaugural speech. During his address, Lincoln uses syntax, irony, and ethos to express his feelings about the upcoming war.…
- 181 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The Kansas-Nebraska Act that was passed by Congress in 1854 increased the already building tension between the North and the South. It caused a civil war in Kansas and many people believed that it was one of the causes of the American Civil War. The disastrous effects that were caused by the Kansas-Nebraska Act serves as an example of what could happen if people in America today were to become as divided over an issue as they were over…
- 542 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Civil War was a decisive and important part of American history. The north and south had radically different ideas of the direction the country should take and tension had reached a boiling point. The two different viewpoints can be seen in speeches made by John Smith Preston and Abraham Lincoln. John Preston’s speech to the Virginia state legislature outlined the south’s viewpoint and reasons for seceding while Abraham Lincoln’s first Inaugural Address outlined why the south could not succeed and his duties as president.…
- 1087 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
All the reasons have a tendency, in the author's point of view, to point to the Republican administration of the Union on the need for drastic change in the leadership of military operations, and the general approach to military and domestic policies. This is especially true of the President Lincoln, whose authority grew, and the government during the war was almost unlimited. The political analysis of the situation of the war years provided throughout the book is not the key purpose of the author of 1861: The Civil War Awakening. The real aim of Goodheart (2011) is to present it fluently as it would be frivolous and arrogant in relation to this complex, multi-dimensional process. To understand the situation of those difficult years, to understand a complex set of problems which confronted Lincoln and his administration, is possible only if a reader grasps as much as possible, in order to break through…
- 821 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Unable to secure support in Congress Buchanan found his administration paralyzed. This was compounded by Lincoln's refusal to agree to any policy before actually becoming president. Buchanan did support efforts to conciliate the two sides, but when these failed, so did the Union. Many Northerners blamed Buchanan for the failing of the Union and the ensuing Civil War. Buchanan asserted that states did not have the right to secede; He also believed he had no power to stop…
- 884 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Many historians today believe that the American Civil War could've been avoided. They believed that if better leaders were elected, the division between the North and South could have been prevented. The views on democracy from America could have resolved disputes as well. Others say the war could have been avoided, but a major conflict was bound to happen. Some of the events that led up to the Civil War include the Mexican-American War, the dispute over the 36o30' line, and the Fugitive Slave Act.…
- 458 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Was the Civil War repressible of was it irrepressible? The Civil War was irrepressible. Due to alot of different factors this war eventually could not be stop. Especially due to the growing tentions of slavery between the North and the South.…
- 321 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Of all the events that happened in the US before 1877, the one event that completely changed the course of history was the direct result of the Kansas Nebraska act i.e. Bleeding Kansas. The Kansas Nebraska act allowed for new territories to decide if they were a free or a slave sate by popular sovereignty. It undid the compromise that was made in Missouri compromise, which designated a line of latitude to be the separation of free and slave states. The Kansas Nebraska act re ignited the differences between pro and anti-slavery sections. Violent events and fighting had become so terrible that it had to be termed as “Bleeding Kansas”.…
- 1081 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Abraham Lincoln is most always associated with the Civil War. But, he was not elected through a majority of the popular vote. In fact, with only forty percent of the popular vote, he wasn 't even close to a majority. His Republican platform reached out to many groups, but left out the South. Many southerners thought he was an abolitionist, although he did favor monetary compensation and a Union. As a result of southern fears over Lincoln, he was not allowed on the ballot in ten southern states, and many states threatened to secede if he was elected. His election prompted the first state, South Carolina, to secede from the Union, and started the Civil War. This contributed to the growing rift greatly, in that the South not only felt their livelihoods were being threatened through the potential loss of their slaves, but also had a sense of disenfranchisement at the polls, because the minority candidate won. But, even though if Lincoln had not been elected, the Civil War would have been delayed, Lincoln was really just the straw that broke the camel 's back. The south was looking for an excuse to secede, and Lincoln gave it too him, which makes this election a relatively minor event in contributing to the civil war.…
- 888 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
To conclude, the Civil War was an unavoidable occurrence in the history of the United States. With both sides unwilling to compromise or to find a settlement that pleased them both, there was no other option. If each side had been a…
- 623 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
One of those effects was the Kansas and Nebraska Act, establishing the geographical boundary of slavery on the north and south axis. The South argues for the right to bring their enslaved wherever they choose, but the north argues that the west shouldn’t introduce slavery at all. Another one of these situations was Charles Sumner attacking Preston Brooks over a speech about the “border ruffians.” The “Caning of Sumner” in May 1856 followed upon a speech given by Sumner two days earlier in which he condemned slavery in no uncertain terms, declaring; “[Admitting Kansas as a slave state] is the rape of a virgin territory, compelling it to the hateful embrace of slavery; and it may be clearly traced to a depraved longing for a new slave state, the hideous offspring of national government (41.4.1). Including the Lincoln-Douglass debates that involved two men arguing the central issue of slavery and its expansion.…
- 689 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
“The Fate of their Country” is basically an annotated distillation of 2 other books written by Professor Holt “Political Crisis of the 1850s” and “The Rise of Fall of the American Whig Party: Jacksonian Politics and the Onset of the Civil War.” After reading “The Fall of their Country” it seems like it is a much more concise and direct version of his ideas which appeals to students and casual readers as well as historians and scholars due to not only being a mere 127 pages but also because it drives its points home. He gives a wonderful summary of the territorial debates in Congress starting with the Missouri Compromise then the Compromise of 1850 and finishing at the notorious and disastrous Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. One could argue that this book in short is a greatly abbreviated…
- 1065 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Friday April 12, 1861, America embarked into war with its biggest adversary; America! The American Civil War broke out, and what was believed to be a quick battle by the North, turned out to be a long bloody four years and left the country devastated. President Abraham Lincoln, the 16th president of the United States, successfully lead this country through its greatest constitutional, military and moral crisis. Everything he did was in the best interest in preserving this nation to what it is today. If President Lincoln task of preserving the union would have failed, our nation would be a split nation today. All the events of the Civil War are what truly shaped the face of America today. The President knew that if he wanted to preserve this nation as a whole, not only would he have to win the war, but he would have to have a plan in place to immediately fix the nation to help it move forward from war. During his time in the white house and towards the end of the war, when it was evident the North would prevail, he worked on a reconstruction plan to get the South up and moving. During the war, the northern armies had gone through the South destroying everything that would help the south to prevail in the war. The agricultural belt that was the strength of the was nothing more than ashes as the North marched his armies from Atlanta to the Sea, famously known as Sherman’s March, in which they destroyed everything from crops to railroads. After four long years of war, on April 10, 1865 General Lee surrendered, and the Civil War came to an end. Lincoln was preparing to move the nation forward in Reconstruction. The President, however, never saw his plans for Reconstruction in America because on April 14, 1865, he was assassinated, leaving Andrew Johnson to take over as President,…
- 1366 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays