In the news article “Taking A Stab At Our Infatuation With Guns” by Molly Ivins she asserts the idea that in order to possess a gun, people should get a license to own one or to not own one at all. According to Irvin, the cliché that “guns do not kill, people do” helps her argument stand out. It helps asserts her idea, because she says that the guns main use is to kill. Ivins is certain that people who are crazy should not be allowed to own a gun, and that only those who want to be a part of “a well-regulated militia”. Her reasoning behind it is she does not accept kids who own gun or are in reach of gun does not put all of us in a safer place.…
New York Times best selling author, radio host, and Fox News contributor, Tammy Bruce, wrote an article called “Why Gun Control Won’t End Mass Murders.” Bruce’s purpose is to inform readers that gun control laws are not going to stop murders from occurring. She adopts a grim tone in order to get her readers to think about why the gun laws are the way they are. For years the government has been trying to enforce gun laws and yet murders rates are not decreasing. Some points Bruce addresses include mass shootings, liberals, and the Mayo Clinc’s statistics towards drugs. Tammy Bruce was not successful in getting her point across.…
This is also supported by the U.S. Supreme Court which said, “The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.” This quote shows how altering the laws would be the opposite of what the Second Amendment states. Also according to the Declaration of Independence, our unalienable rights are, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and, “that whenever any form of Government becomes destructive of these ends it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it... it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.” This means that whenever we are in perilous situation we can defend ourselves to secure our right of life. Also, “banning guns will take away yet another piece of our liberty,” according to balancedpolitics.org. Eventually this will lead to having more of our rights taken away and result in tyranny. This is why we must not alter the gun laws we have…
For years now our country has been in a heated debate on the second amendment. Some people feel that it is not safe to let citizens have and carry guns, while others agree it is their right as an american to own a gun. In America, there are approximately 270 million firearms possessed by civilians, and only 897,000 carried by police.Close to 33,000 Americans were victims of gun-related deaths in 2011 and an average of 268 citizens are shot every day. In the past decade our country has witnessed 142 mass school shootings and, in 2010 alone 19,392 people committed suicide with a gun. These frightening statistic are what I believe cuz some people to be against the second amendment.…
Children at Sandy Hook Elementary School were helpless when Adam Lanza walked in with three guns and shot twenty kids and six adults. As a result for not letting teachers carry some type of weapon, teachers and student are getting shot. The only Thing that students have for defense is any object that is in that room, but that doesn't compare to a gun.…
A controversial argument opposite to both viewpoints of gun control mentioned, is the negatives of guns and the need for gun control. In the article, “The Impact of Violence on Children,” Joy Osofsky elaborates that gun violence in communities are extremely detrimental in communities especially on children. Osofsky, a professor of public health in Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, uses masses of children psychology, scenarios and experiences to demonstrate the importance of gun control and to increase gun regulations. She focuses on children’s response to guns and violence, showing that the exposure of gun violence to children at their early ages not only increases their interest to use guns, but also the likelihood to use…
One day, you could be one person who gets injured or get killed by a gun. We should always prevent accidents to happening by not allowing guns to be used by people. Guns could save you from getting killed by it could allow more humans to be killed in the future. Preventing guns can also reduce mass shootings to occur and gang members to use guns. Hunting is an unfair sport. While the hunters have powerful weapons, the animal can be easily harmed because it unarmed and helpless. From now on, we should try to reduce the amount of guns used in private homes.…
Gun control in the United States has become a highly controversial topic over the years. There have been plenty of debates on the gun control laws and people have taken to being either pro gun control laws or anti gun control laws. One thing we can’t deny would be that gun control laws would keep us all safer and even save lives. Statistic show that more guns equals to more homicide cases. If more citizens have easy access to guns, they’re more likely to kill than if they didn’t have easy access to the guns. Public places like schools, restaurants, and churches are not acceptable places for people to be carrying guns; it puts the public in danger. It should be illegal.…
The debate over the restrictions of gun control is centered on the Second Amendment to the Constitution, which gives people the right to bear arms. Gun control supporters believe that this explicit right does not extend to ownership of military-style firearms. For example, groups like the National Rifle Association argue that gun control infringes on the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. Gun control is an on-going debate because each year more people are killed by the use of guns. However, guns are not the result in the number of homicides each year, the problems rests with the irresponsible gun users. Gun Control would do nothing but harm America because guns offer protection and security…
Public service announcements are maybe a solution to the mass shootings that occur in our society, an example of a PSA would be anti-smoking smoking ads. Anti-smoking ads are aimed towards “rebellious” teens; teens who hate being told what to do and how to do it. The ads usually depict a teen having to always give up free time or spend their hard earned money which explains the consumption that smoking has over their lives. PSA’s should also focus on the kinds of individuals who commit these mass shootings, talking about and illustrating the consequences that comes with the horrible acts will most likely make a person think twice about carrying out a mass shooting. They could also explain the toll it takes on the victims families and/or anyone else who might be affected in a negative way.…
Young kids don’t have the understanding that a gun can potentially kill or seriously injure someone. A great amount of kids involved in tragic accidents are too young. Most parents think they’re old enough to keep a gun around the house and believe they’re responsible enough to be given one, but they’re not. According to the Journal Gazette newspaper, the younger, the more curious a child is about guns. So, the more time and effort it will take to bring him or her to the point of understanding why it is so important not to handle guns without adult guidance. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Nearly 800 children under 14 years old were killed in gun accidents from 1999 to…
There was a school in Israel that took students on a trip to the “Island of Peace”, where they were asked to leave their weapons behind. “An Arab gunman saw the easy target and opened fire, killing seven children and wounding six.”(An Absurd Idea?). Bad guys are always looking for the easiest way to commit a crime. Another situation took place in Pearl, Mississippi, where a student stole a hunting rifle with many rounds and opened fire in his school. “The vice principal rushed to his car and took his .45 semi auto pistol and made the student surrender.”(An Absurd Idea?). Yet another reason why guns should be in schools. Lastly, there was an eighth-grade graduation dance in Edinboro, Pennsylvania where a fourteen year old started to shoot and the banquet hall owner stopped it from being worse. “The owner rushed to his office where he had a shotgun and confronted the shooter, limiting the toll to only one dead teacher and two wounded students.” (An Absurd Idea?). In any scenario, a firearm wielded by trained personnel truly saves…
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed, as stated in the Second Amendment U.S. Constitution. Squeezing the trigger on a gun to take someone’s life will be second nature if it prevents innocent people or loved ones from being shot by an intruder. To some people gun control is a crime issue, to others it a right issue. So is a society without guns a safer place or is it? Let’s take the UK for example, in 1997 the UK banned hand guns and crimes doubled in the decade as said in The Times August 24, 2007. The cartoon picture above was found through Google on “how gun control works” by Vicki McClure Davidson posted on July 3, 2012. What is being depicted from the cartoon picture is how we will defend our safety, family’s safety, and be able to prevent acts of rage from a mass murders and crime. The person without a gun in his hand would represent any person who is for control in the United States of America. Instead of pointing a gun back he uses his fingers as a gun and holds an orange in his other hand as his second line of defense. The person holding the gun is a criminal who has bought his gun from the black market or didn’t surrender his guns that were not registered. The message in this picture is take away our rights to bear arms and the option we are left with is throw an orange at a criminal that’s pointing a gun at you. This picture employs the patho angle to imply that society would benefit from firearms in the hands of responsible citizens, but attempts to keep firearms away from these citizens do more harm than good.…
Violent shootings are becoming more and more popular in the United States. Last year there were 58,543 shooting incidents. There were 1,956 incidents where it was a self-defense case. There were also 2,552 home invasion cases and 2,201 of the shooting incidents were unintentional, which does make a whole lot of sense to me because I don’t know how you accidentally shoot somebody. However, 384 of these shooting incidents were classified as mass shooting incidents. That means there was a mass shooting everyday last year, which is a pretty scary thing to think about (Past Summary Ledgers).…
(Opposing Viewpoints: Gun Control, 2014) This statement is totally false. Thousands upon thousands of citizens in the United States of America have purchased, owned, and carried firearms of all kinds including military-grade assault weapons and have been law abiding, well behaved, and even used his or her guns to protect his or herself, their families, and other people even. The American media, however, refuses to broadcast the brave and heroic vigilantes…. CNN, CNBC, ABC, Michael Moore (director) and many other liberally biased news networks and celebrity activists try their hardest to turn the American people against one another. They exploit, politicize, and even scapegoat tragedies and push for stricter gun laws and even bans to be passed. Other networks, such as Fox News, aren’t much better, but at least they tell the truth when it comes to guns. These liberally biased networks and individuals have taken tragedies such as the Columbine High School massacre (1999), the Aurora Colorado theater shooting (2012), The Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, and the recent Orlando Pulse Nightclub shooting (2016), all involving assault weapons (McEvers, 2016), and used them as propaganda for their liberal agendas. Take Michael Moore’s 2002 documentary film Bowling for Columbine as an example; Moore uses this tragedy to appeal to the emotional side of viewers, whilst discreetly intertwining gun control propaganda. He travels to K-Marts across America pushing them to stop selling bullets and ammunition and questions actor and activist Charlton Heston about his support of the National Rifle Association (NRA). On a lighter note, many citizens have used…