Preview

Nehemas and Aristotle

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
308 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nehemas and Aristotle
Nehemas & Aristotle
For Nehemas, friendship is a moral state where one treats a specific group of people with preference. Where one neglects neglecting moral value in order to give those specific people that specific treatment. The values of friendship distinguish us from each other and make us different in the sense that opposites attract or it makes us interesting to each other. He says that there are different types of friends. Casual, close and in between. The close friends are very special and important however no matter the type of friendship we have it is always significant. One says we can’t change or choose who our friends are. Nehemas on the other had says we can choose our friends as a kind of freedom to identify with the reasons why we chose the friendships we choose. Friendships allow us to become a specific kind of person. Bringing to light that we choose friends depending on who we think they can help us become.
One aspect of friendship however is that people do change, thus friendships change bringing about the possibility to loosing friendships. This is because the person one is attracted to as a friend is no longer in existence. On the other hand the mode of the friendship can change when one or both change. These will be categorized as long term relationships. This is in fact why in fact a friendship is important to the building of an individual and their character. Seems like he shares similar views with Aristotle as he compares friendship to a relationship between a painter and an appreciator. One can enjoy the art if they are familiar with the piece of art. Such as different aspects of our lives friendship is important in our daily lives and should involve our moral values in order to grow a better

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    When friendships are dissolved, the consequences can be devastating. In Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics - VIII – IX he explains how humans learn from one another, and that humans are innately social animals (Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics - VIII – IX, 148-149). Friendships are required in life learn about values. Without friends, humans would not be able to learn such values from each other, nor will they be able to confide in each other. Having friends in life allow for the mutual growth of both parties. Rebecca Traister writes in her article “What Women Find in Friends That They May Not Get from Love” her experiences with her friend Sara. Traister says, “In each other, we found respite, recognition, a shared eagerness to relax, take stock and talk about it all.” (Sara Traister, “What Women Find in Friends That They May Not Get from Love, 1), going on to say this relationship was mutual where they benefited from each other’s company. As they both grew together over time, much like Aristotle suggests is the value of friendship. Humans life are not fulfilled unless friends are there to support each other. As Traister says, “For many women, friends are our primary partner through life” (Sara Traister, “What Women Find in Friends That They May Not Get from Love, 5). In Traister’s case, the friendship she shares with Sara is a friendship of virtue.…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In these two books, Aristotle talked about friendship. He started by stating what the three different types of friendship are. The first type is when it is based on utility. This type of friendship is all about getting a benefit from someone else, and it will change according to circumstances. If a person doesn’t get benefits from the other anymore, the friendship will cease to be present. Benefits don’t have to be the only ground for friendship of this type, but there are definitely clear benefits involved. One example of this type of friendship Aristotle gave was friendships with foreigners. The second type of friendship is based on pleasure. In this type, you find the other person entertaining, and it is more about the experience of being near the person than anything else. This type is common between young people because young people’s lives are regulated by feelings. These friendships come and go often, and the friend doesn’t bring much to the friendship. The last type of friendship is based on goodness. This is when two “good” people are friends for the sake of each other. Both people in this friendship wish for the good of the other, and this type of relationship is most durable. Aristotle considered this type to be the perfect friendship. He didn’t care for the first two types because they are both short-lived, and they are circumstantial (Pgs. 203-208).…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the preceding quote by C.S Lewis; Mr Lewis explains what friendship does for a person. To paraphrase it in an understandable way, he seems to have said; Friendship is not necessary to survive, it only enhances life and makes life more interesting. This is my personal viewpoint exactly! Throughout life many people like to have other people close by them, parents have children, couples are married, teenagers have friends…. A lot of life is spent with friends and this many cause people to think that without friends they become nothing.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Within book 8 and 9 of Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, he proposes friendship is one of the most choice-worthy goods an individual can have (Aristotle 149, 1170a, section 7). However, in chapter 3 of book 8, Aristotle asserts the finest friendships are enduring insofar it is good, and the virtues remain the same. However, his proposal about the similarities of virtues doesn't seem entirely correct since people gradually change over time, but the relationship can continue to be good and individuals remain close friends. Problematically, Aristotle asserts if the characteristics of the friend were to change, the friendship ought to be dissolved since the peer can potentially become bad; unless the agent can return their friend to their original…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Analyzing Aristotle

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1) The soul and the body are different forms. While the body is visible and mortal, the soul is invisible and immortal. He suggests that although the body dies and decays, the soul continues to exist. I do believe there is life after death, everyone must eventually die, and it cannot be avoided. However, even though death is a fact of life, it is a topic that many people prefer not to talk about. This avoidance of discussion is usually due to the denial of one’s own death and the denial is usually due to fear. The fear is, for many people, a fear of the unknown. In my opinion i believe that when humans die, the body and the brain dies, but the mind still exists and it creates our afterlife according to our own beliefs and expectations. If a person believes there in nothing after death then there will not be a dream, it will be as if the person is asleep forever without dreaming.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle's Beliefs

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Aristotle believed that all people by nature desire to know. A sign of one who knows is that that person can teach, while the person of experience without knowledge cannot. He defined wisdom as knowledge of principles and causes. In his Physics and Metaphysics Aristotle discussed the material and formal causes Plato used and also the efficient and final…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle

    • 901 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The statement argues that Aristotle’s theory of the four causes is impossible to apply to everyday life and cannot be applied to the real world. Aristotle believed there are four causes that determine what things are and their purpose and claims this is how we differentiate one thing from another. These four causes are known as the material cause, the efficient cause, the formal cause and most importantly for Aristotle, the final cause, and these together describe how ‘things’ transform from the state of actuality to potentiality. To some extent the theory of the four causes could be accurate and plausible, however, some of the ideas behind it is flawed and unrealistic. In this essay I will cover the three main faults of Aristotle’s theory. Namely, its lack of clarity, that the theory is based on assumptions and that there is no evidence to support the existence of the prime mover.…

    • 901 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle and Friendship

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to Aristotle, there are three kinds of friendship based on three kinds of love that unite people. Aristotle defines friendship through the word, philia. Philia is the emotional bond between human beings which provides the basis for all forms of social organizations, common effort, and personal relationships between people. The three kinds of friendship Aristotle explains are utility, pleasure, and complete friendship.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Citizenship

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages

    (R) According to the passage, traditional view of friendship is “not merely private: they are public, even political,for a civic order”.…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    African American

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Friendship is a virtue or at least involves virtue. Friendship is always a special thing but people tend to forget about how much its value is. Friendship is not just necessary, but also noble.Friendship consists of goodwill between two people. You can only have a few friends being that its take some precious time to build a real friendship. Aristotle’s speaks about how there are three kinds of friendship. The first is friends of utility, where both people receive some benefit from each other. Aristotle believed that this is the type of friendship that is for the old. Aristotle argued that they “are at such a time of life pursue not what is pleasant but what is beneficial.” The second is friends of pleasure, where both people are attracted to each other, good looks, or other their pleasant qualities all together . aristotles says this friendship is for the young. Aristotle argues that the young because “...quickly become friends and quickly stop...” and “...love and stop loving quickly...” The third is friends of excellence, where both people admire the other’s excellence and help one another strive for excellence. Aristotle says this about friends of excellence “...complete sort of friendship between people who are good and alike in virtue...”friends of virtue or excellence is hard to come by especially in the world we live in today because it is so much individualism. According to Aristotle the first two friendships are accidental, because in these case friends are only thinking about their own utility and pleasure, not are going to change over a period of time. If a friendship is based on excellence it will be a long lasting relationship, because excellence is a quality. This kind of friendship is the one everyone wants to have and it overlooks the other two friendships. This kind of friendship though is hard to find and takes a lot of time to progress but it is worth it. It is nothing like having a real and true friend. Friends who want the same thing will…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cicero urges that people put friendship before everything else, but this is where the contradiction in his words and thoughts lie. If friendship was said to be the greatest gift given aside from wisdom, then why did men only befriend those who benefit him? By befriending someone who subsidizes the friend, money, wealth, power and status is being put before friendship. Greed seems to be the common theme in each view on what a friendship should be. Although Cicero has good intentions in this dialogue, there are…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Faux Friendship

    • 1316 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Friendship is defined by Webster as the state of being friends, friendly relation, or attachment, to a person, or between persons. Webster further states that friendship can also be describe as affection arising from mutual esteem, good will, friendliness, and amity. Friendship is considered to be an essential aspect of everyone’s life, as we are not self sufficient in and of ourselves. Friendship, as the world sees it, is a bond between two individuals that should not involve betrayal but should exhibit each individual as being trustworthy and loyal. In many cases, friendships, despite their necessities, are either forced or morally required to end because several components of the friendship have been ruined. We have substituted face-to face encounters with Facebook, Twitter and other social networks. In William Deresiewicz’s, article “Faux Frienship”, he identifies friendship as “a high calling, demanding extraordinary qualities of character –rooted in virtue” and he supports this perception of friendship by historical events and comparisons of romantic partners, parents and children and friendship in the workplace.…

    • 1316 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Friends encourage good habits, chase away depression, help you overcome diseases and cause satisfaction, pleasure and happiness” (The Huffington Post UK). It has been scientifically proven that you need friends in your life. Nothing can show a person’s loyalty than being the greatest friend possible. There are certain people that others need in their life to be able to live a great life. John Steinbeck, the author of, Of Mice and Men, shows that a healthy friendship is the most important commodity you can have in your life.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages

    By saying this, Aristotle is explaining that moral virtue is not something that you are born with, it is something you develop with your character. Moral virtue is not naturally acquired, because it is a result of habit, and one may change habits at any time.…

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The second type of friendship that aristotle discusses is the friendship of pleasure . The friendship of pleasure is genreally seen builiding up between young people as thier relationships are based on pleasures and passions .Aristotle thinks the frienship of pleasure can be seen between a group of likeminded people shring same intesr , passion between lovers.It is diffrent from the friendship of utility as the people who are seeking frienship of utility they are genreally looking for benifits from the other person or trying to seek any advantage in a long term but friensdhip of pleasure is where one is seeking pleasure presently.Normally this type of realtionships that are based on passion are seen in youth which change constantly .Thus…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays