Preview

Neil Gorsuch Kathleen Parker Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
424 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Neil Gorsuch Kathleen Parker Analysis
Kathleen Parker gives her judgment on newly appointed supreme court justice Neil Gorsuch. Her purpose is to denounce the ‘left wing’ slander of this new ‘right wing’ judge. Parker states facts and gives reasoning to show why we should feel secure about Trump’s appointee. In the article, Kathleen Parker using contradicting descriptions of Neil Gorsuch to display his true characteristics. When recalling the Democrats reaction to Neil Gorsuch, Parker says they painted Gorsuch as a ‘cruel and bloodless beast who shrinks from the light and plays havoc with history.’ However, contrasting this view are Gorsuch true characteristics; a man who is ‘courageous in protecting the people and the constitution by adhering to the text and original intent without …show more content…
Parker, as a self-proclaimed conservative, has a bias to be pro-Neil Gorsuch because he too has very conservative beliefs. She argues that Neil Gorsuch is an intelligent man who abides strictly to the constitution and will allow no room for leniency. Even though Kathleen does have a bias, she also looks at the opposing democratic side to the argument. However, despite encompassing both sides of the argument, Kathleen Parker does fail to mention the fact that the new Trump presidency refused to even have a hearing on behalf of the democratic nominee (Judge Garland). This refusal to reason with the Democrats played a large part into the issue of Neil Gorsuch appointment and, therefore, shows some shortcomings in Parker’s argument as she left it out completely. In my opinion, Neil Gorsuch is a qualified judge and was the right pick for this country. Being a practicing justice who has a doctorate in law from the University of Oxford, he is certainly educated enough. Although he does have very conservative beliefs, he known to be an “originalist” who will strictly follow the constitution. I feel that the constitution was written with our best interests in mind and if Neil Gorsuch follows it, the United States will be in good

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    As we continue through Gideon’s Trumpet, Anthony Lewis continues to explain the complicated process that the Supreme Court takes in hearing a case. There are many instances in which Lewis shows how he is in favor of thick, procedural democracy. Lewis emphasizes the process of judicial review; the prejudice is the court system, the history of ones right to counsel, and how the court was changing at the time. Through these examples, Lewis shows how the Supreme Court is not a perfectly unbiased system; it is quite adequate in its process. However, as this book relates to American Creation, the time and place of the novel played a pivotal role in fate of Clarence Earl Gideon. Throughout this section of Gideon’s Trumpet, Lewis shows that the case of Gideon v. Cochran and later Gideon v. Wainwright was not as important as the time at which the case occurred.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article “Why These Four Justices Rejected Marriage Equality,” the author, Sunnivie Brydum, presents the different views of the justices who disagreed with the newly approved same-sex marriage bill. Recently the United States of America legalized same-sex marriage, and although five of the nine justices voted in favor of it, there were still four justices who expressed their dissent about the new law. The reasons these four justices voted against the law varied, but all four justices had made the same decision of voting against the law. Chief Justice John Roberts claims that the decision should have been made by the majority, not only the Court. The constitution says that justices are only supposed to state what the laws are in a country,…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Firstly, a major principal characteristic of the Roberts Court is over turning congressional and state legislation in order to achieve conservative goals. The Roberts court is finding laws unconstitutional and reversing precedent, two measures of activism. But the ideological direction of the court’s activism has undergone a marked change toward conservative results. The Roberts Court issued conservative decisions 58% of the time in its first 5 years throughout all cases. The Burger and Rehnquist courts issued conservative decisions 55% and the lowest from the Warren courts, which issued conservative decisions only 34% of the time. The incline in conservative decisions gives evidence that there is a growing number of people who favour this strict and traditional form of court rulings and decision making as opposed to Roberts immediate predecessors who display a more modern and loose approach to the US political system…

    • 968 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Analysis of Karen Russell

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages

    St. Lucy’s Home for girls Raised by Wolves, Karen Russell’s collection of fantastical short stories take all that is mundane and fractures it into a fantastical world with humor, dramatic tone, or cultural/religious undertones. Russell whirls a reader into her stories with her capability to encase a reader in the story with her repetition of one’s senses. Constantly brining in the senses of a reader brought in the smells of a surrounding from the protagonist or in this case the narrator. In St. Lucy’s Home for girls Raised by Wolves, our narrator, Claudette, speaks from the mind of a half human half wolf in transition. Of the pack’s reaction to the nuns, how Sister Josephine “tasted like sweat and freckles” (226) after Claudette bit her ankle, which she “smelled easy to kill” (226); how the mousy social worker was “nervous smelling” (226), eventually Claudette herself “smelled like a purebred girl, easy to kill” (242). When the sisters were reunited with the brothers they no longer smelt as of family they knew but of “pomade and cold, sterile sweat” (241). Russell creates such realistic imagery in a non-realistic world. Not just with scents but with a sense of touch sensory. How the girls went “knuckling along” (224) the floors when they first arrived; even when speaking, their ineptitude to force their tongues to “curl around our false new names” (229) creates such realistic imagery you sense your tongue running across your own teeth.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Magtadt defines liberals has typically holding civil rights close to heart. They are often the primary defenders of individuals or groups that they see as victims of past discrimination, such as racial minorities, women and the poor (p. 37, 2015). Although identifying as independent she has quite often voted along with the liberal side of the Supreme Court. However, it can be said that unlike other liberals Sotomayor takes a more case-by-case approach. Sotomayor has shown a willingness to side with conservative in cases pertaining to criminal law, no doubt an influence of her time as prosecutor. For example, in Wetzel v. Lambert back in February 2010, she sided with the conservative bloc’s majority opinion to reinstituting a convict’s death…

    • 154 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    * "All of you know that we're struggling right now with an assault on over 220 years of Senate tradition by the Democrats filibustering circuit court nominees, thus denying us the reasonable responsibility of an up-or-down vote to give advice and consent." -Sen. Bill…

    • 3404 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unlike Nanapush and Fleur, Louise Erdrich uses the character of Pauline to demonstrate the rejection of Ojibwa religion and culture. Throughout the novel, Pauline is known as a liar and troublemaker who tries her best and hardest to single handedly destroy Ojibwa life, religion, and culture. For example, in the novel, Pauline had “bothered [her] father into sending [her] south, to the white town. [She] had decided to learn the lace-making trade from the nuns” (Erdrich, 14). Pauline is asking her dad to send her south away from the other Native Americans, and more importantly, away from the Ojibwa religion. In this part of the novel, Erdrich best conveys Pauline’s rejection of Ojibwa religion by showing how the efforts she would go through in order to separate herself from the Ojibwa way of life. Pauline has rejected this lifestyle to such great amounts that she is willing to move…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He writes, “…the main danger in judicial interpretation of the Constitution … is that judges will mistake their own predilections for the law. … Non-Originalism, which under one or another formulation invoked ‘fundamental values’ as the touchstone of constitutionality, plays precisely to this weakness” (Scalia…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since his appointment in 1986 by former President Ronald Reagan, former Associate Justice Antonin Scalia served as the Supreme Court’s most renowned conservative. Acting as a sort of conservative judicial giant in the world of American politics, Justice Scalia’s appointment provided a beacon of hope for the political conservatives of the 1980’s, up until his recent death in February 13, 2016. He accomplished many great things in his tenure, and he is perhaps most remembered for his written opinions, which brought much public attention to the Supreme Court and its actions, in a way that has never been achieved by his contemporaries. In fact, he has been a tremendous influence on how Americans view the law and the constitution, from those interested…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Now that you have started reading this essay, you and I are now connected by a web of connections.” This is what Susan Griffin, author of “Our Secret”, a chapter taken from Griffin’s insightful book A Chorus of Stones, most likely would have declared. Griffin argues that, “all of us, especially all of us who read her essay - are part of a complex web of connections” (265). But how are people who do not even know each other connected? Griffin implies that people are part of a “larger matrix” and have a “common past” (265). The “common past” between people that Griffin asserts can be proved by examining the unique underlying comparisons and analogies she applies in the chapter. “Our Secret” is a collection of Griffin’s own life story and the life stories of others, including Heinrich Himmler, Heinz, a painter, a friend, Holocaust survivors, a homosexual man, and her sister. She even uses RNA and cells as analogies to indicate how even the materials that compose people have similar functions to people themselves. Although people may question how…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Clarence Thomas

    • 3655 Words
    • 15 Pages

    In the annals of American history, this name has risen to the forefront of noted Supreme Court Justices and has become synonymous with the ideals and philosophies of uncompromising conservatives. Undeniably, the same name also congers thoughts of hypocrisy, desertion, and self-denial toward one of America 's most divisive and enigmatic political figures. Since his nomination by President George H. Bush to the United States Supreme Court, Justice Thomas has been inundated with criticism by those who oppose his expressed jurisprudence and with praises by those who follow his hard-nosed, unapologetic style of governance in his role as America 's second African-American Supreme Court Justice.…

    • 3655 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justices of the United States Supreme Court are strategic actors who strive to secure policy outcomes as close to their preferred outcome as possible. Accomplishing this sometimes requires justices to not always pursue their true policy preferences and sometimes it requires justices to ignore legal and policy questions. In this essay, I will analyze how justices were strategic in a few landmark supreme court cases.…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We the People

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How do Classical Republicanism and Natural rights philosophers affect the Founders view about government because, both the Classical Republicans and Natural Rights philosophers impacted the Founders view about the government. In the preamble it shows that there are more Classical Republicans signatures and a few Natural rights philosophers’ signatures. The three court cases that I chose were Betts v. Brady, Bowers v. Hardwick, and Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan. In the first case Brady v. Betts in 1995, Betts was the offender, who robbed a place in Maryland but could not afford and attorney. The 6th amendment then comes into play because it sets forth rights related to criminal prosecutions. Betts could not defend himself in the case and he was sent to jail. Classical Republicanism is shown here because Betts stated he did not have an attorney to the judge. And the Judge and said that in the 6th amendment it did not include the rights to an attorney. Which also rules in favor of Natural Rights philosophy? The second case I decided to go with was Bowers v. Hardwick 1985, Michael Hardwick was being observed by a Georgia officer while he had been engaged in sexual intercourse with someone of the same sex. Hardwick’s first amendment rights were violated by the police officer by observing Hardwick in his own personal life. In this case it shows a huge chunk of Classical Republicanism because the court had agreed with Hardwick that he had violated his rights. Although the officer had denied the fact that he violated the rights of Hardwick, the court still sided with Hardwick. In my last case Lorreto v. Teleprompter Manhattan 1982, a company had violated a customer’s rights to privacy which means violating the fourth amendment. Classical Republicanism is shown in this case because they say it is a violation of privacy. Natural rights Philosophy is show because they say that the company…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justice Ginsburg’s dissent argued that Congress’ power to enforce the 14th and 15th Amendments encompasses legislative action such as the Voting Rights Act. She believes Congress does not have unlimited authority, but must show that the means taken rationally advance a legitimate objective. By holding section 4 unconstitutional, the majority’s opinion makes it impossible to effectively enforce section 5. According to her, in voting rights cases the court should defer to Congress, because they have been given sweeping powers to protect such rights. The court should only ask if the methods used by Congress to address the problem are rational, and not subject them to a tougher test. According to Ginsburg, “Congress approached the 2006 reauthorization of the Voting Rights Act with great care and seriousness, the same cannot be said of the court’s…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Court System Interview

    • 1334 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Eastman, J.C. (2015). Precedent: A Defense of Judge Roy Moore and the Alabama Supreme Court. The Witherspoon Institute’s Public Discourse. Retrieved from http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2015/03/14627/…

    • 1334 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays