Preview

Net Neutrality

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1041 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Net Neutrality
Zechariah Rasmussen
April 30th 2010
English 109 position paper

Net Neutrality: An Endangered Idea
The internet is something I am sure each and every one of us uses on a regular basis or almost on a regular basis. Now think about how much you depend upon it. I would even have to assume that you use it for every thing from work , school , and entertainment. Now imagine if half or three quarters of what you do on the internet now requires you to pay a fee to your ISP (internet service provider) or even worse your ISP will not support it entirely. I don't know about you but that makes me cringe. Now what is it that would make this scenario a reality? The end of net neutrality. What exactly is net neutrality? According to Wikipedia the definition of Net neutrality is a principle that advocates no restrictions on content, sites, or platforms, on the kinds of equipment that may be attached, and on the modes of communication allowed on the internet. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_neutrality) Basically what that is saying is that net neutrality is a concept that promotes the freedom that we currently enjoy when we go online to today.
Many people are for more control of the internet, especially of criminal acts or obscenities that the internet consist of. However net neutrality does not protect any illegal acts. The benefits of the eradication of net neutrality only come to a select group and that group is definitely not the consumer. That group is the hound dogs that control your access to the internet--your ISP(internet service provider).
How is it that ISP's would benefit from the end of net neutrality? They would benefit tremendously. They would be able to monitor the exact data that you request on the internet and if it doesn't promote a service they are running they could slow that service in order to increase the quality of service of something that would benefit them. For instance lets say that you get your internet from the local cable company.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    We’ve spent a lot of time here at TLF talking about the sound economic arguments against net neutrality regulation. We argue that net neutrality regulation will result in worse consequences than leaving the internet relatively unregulated. But to me, the more important point is that net neutrality regulation is itself unjust.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jrlc Chapter 2 Pt. 1

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages

    I believe that eventually some form of net neutrality will have to be put in place to prevent censorship or any restrictions of content based on person-to-person or amount of money being paid for service.…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are people who think net neutrality is ethical; there are several reasons for it. Net neutrality gives non-discriminatory access to the internet which means every website and the content on the internet is treated in the same way. It treats each person in the same way also. For instance, a housewife describing a recipe and a millionaire talking about the company’s new product are treated equally. Net neutrality provides a platform for innovation and creativity. It gives a chance to grow up to new websites, online stores and other e-commerce websites.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Net neutrality”. Two words that seem to pop up every few years, met with the internet’s fury, just to disappear from the public’s collective conscience. Although the words are familiar, the definition is sometimes not. Net neutrality is defined by Dictionary.com as, “the concept that...internet service providers should provide nondiscriminatory access to Internet content…”. Net neutrality is often at risk, thanks to new law proposals that, similarly to the words, seem to keep popping up every few years. Most people would ask, why would such a thing keep coming under fire?…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Net neutrality is the idea that all content on the internet should be treated equally (Schewick, 2009). This means that ISP’s cannot discriminate against content by slowing down content they do not agree with or charging internet companies more to have certain content delivered faster (Schewick, 2009). Net neutrality has been the unspoken standard since the creation of the internet. This is because, when the internet was first created, ISP’s did not have the technology to determine which content was going through their network (Schewick, 2009). Since then, technology has improved and ISP’s now have the ability to determine which content is going through their network and effect its delivery to the end user (Schewick, 2009).…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why Abolishing Net Neutrality Was a Bad Idea With the recent abolishment of net neutrality, an enormous discourse has risen about the legality and ethics of the abolishment of the Obama-era law. Although many argue that net neutrality is not useful for the United States, I think that net neutrality is needed in the interest of citizens. It preserves the internet as a public good and brings important economic benefits. While the opponents of net neutrality argue that the abolishing it will help the economy by reducing investment, I contend that preserving net neutrality allows the internet to be useful to more people and reduces the government’s over-controlling grip over us.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Killswitch Documentary

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Internet has become a popular source of mainstream media. A battle is raging over the control of the Internet, and the rights of the American people are at stake. The documentary Killswitch, exposes the true power of the Internet and how the government is controlling that power; violating freedom of speech and the right to privacy. The documentary takes a stand in favor of Net Neutrality, which is the principle that the Internet enables access to all-content without choosing or blocking certain websites. The efforts of Aaron Swartz and Edward Snowden to win back Internet freedom are highlighted in this documentary in order to appeal to American citizens to take action in favor of Net Neutrality. “Freedom is embedded in technology and we have to protect technology if we want to protect our freedom” (Killswitch). Internet regulation grants power to the Government and violates constitutional rights of Americans hindering the Nation’s founding principle of democracy.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Kriens, S. (2006, November 29). Net Neutrality. Speech presented at Stanford Technology Venture Program, Stanford. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from http://ecorner.stanford.edu/authorMaterialInfo.html?mid=1638…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Net Neutrality

    • 3387 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Net Neutrality is a topic of debate and confusion in the United States. It draws supporters as diverse as the Christian Coalition and moveon.org, pits traditional telecommunications companies like Verizon and Comcast against Internet giants such as Yahoo! and Google, and gives politicians yet another platform to raise an ongoing liberal-conservative debate over government regulation. So what is all this talk about? Philosophically, Net Neutrality is an ethical framework to govern access to the Internet. It advocates no restrictions on content, sites, or platforms, on the kinds of equipment that may be attached, and on the modes of communication allowed. In 2005, the FCC embedded these principles into its policy with an objective to “encourage broadband deployment and preserve and promote the open and interconnected nature of the public Internet” (Policy Statement). This statement and proposed additional legislation is the source of continued controversy today. Fundamentally, the debate is grounded in opinions of necessity of Internet regulations and the repercussions of action or inaction. This paper will attempt to provide a context for the debate, a better understanding of the regulation and the possible implications, and a summary of the differing views.…

    • 3387 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    If net neutrality were to be maintained, the internet users would ultimately achieve their goal, because the internet will remain open and free. This means the utility of the internet users would increase because the regulations for the Internet service providers to take control of the internet would be safeguarded. Currently, the FCC under the leadership of Ajit Pai are siding with the internet service providers. They believe that net neutrality slows down investments by internet service providers. If it is abolished, the utility of the internet service providers will go up, because they believe they can expand and reach more people, while people living in rural areas utility will also go up because they will have access to the internet.…

    • 1730 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Health

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is for you to:1. become familiar with Net Neutrality.2. identify the impact of Net Neutrality on your daily life and use of the Internet.3. identify why people are for it and others oppose it.4. formulate your own opinion about Net Neutrality.Directions: Follow the step-by-step instructions and use Microsoft Word to respond to the questions below. Your response to questions one, two, and three should collectively be no less than 200 words (The word count excludes the text for the questions). All answers must be original – NO copy and pasting from websites! Also, you must also include in-text citations and cite any sources on a reference page using proper MLA or APA format.Complete a word count and post it on the bottom of the document. Be sure to indicate your name and date at the top of the document.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    A writer for Wired, a technology focused magazine and website, even states, “Net neutrality is a dead man walking. The execution date isn’t set, but it could be days, or months (at best)” (Ammori). This is assumed quite a bit in part because the court systems that struck down the original FCC rules seems to be heavily in favor of corporations over the public interest. It also doesn’t help that ISPs are currently offering a false compromise with the FCC. The current rules that the FCC is voting on would allow the FCC to tell ISPs that they are not allowed to block sites entire for no reason, but they would be allowed to throttle any website for any reason of their choosing. This is very worrying, because as Marvin Ammori put it, “Once the court voids the nondiscrimination rule, AT&T, Verizon, and Comcast will be able to deliver some sites and services more quickly and reliably than others for any reason. Whim. Envy. Ignorance. Competition. Vengeance. Whatever. Or, no reason at all.” If our internet is controlled by the decisions of corporations we are in for a bleak future. Websites like Wikipedia, which provide a wealth of free information, would have trouble being able to provide their services to the public for free as they would be facing a set of fees assessed by each ISP based off of the amount of users that access their website. Free sites that share information with people…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “In 2001, the International Telecommunication Union calculated that, approximately 2.3 billion people had internet access at the end of that year. Since then, the percentage of people using the internet around the world has continued to grow” (Li 2). Censoring the internet has been a hot topic for quite a while now. Many people believe that censoring the web isn’t a good thing because of certain laws and rights we have as citizens. The internet has some cons but it also has many pros. The downside of the censorship is that the truth is blocked out and it violates our freedom of speech. On the other hand, censorship of the internet can reduce the numbers or even stop human trafficking, prevent identity theft, stop cyber bullying and so much…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "The government should continue regulations and keep control over net neutrality. Net Neutrality greatly benefits the people of the internet. The current regulations allow people to be free online. They are able to express their opinions and feelings with a free, uncensored internet. With net neutrality, Internet Service Providers (ISPs) are not allowed to censor and control what people see on the internet, meaning that manipulation and bias is not possible on the internet.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Net Neutrality

    • 1506 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Net Neutrality is a legal concept that has recently been the focus of numerous media headlines. Let me make this clear. Net Neutrality is not simply another meandering piece of legislature, rather it is philosophical idea woven into law. Now that this philosophy has been written into law by the United States government the true nature of its framework coming to light ("What the heck is net neutrality? - The Washington Post," n.d.). Net Neutrality has been a leading topic of discussion in the field of technology for quite some time, yet few know exactly what the term means. This is very unfortunate because the subject matter has the potential to significantly impact us all. The following text will explain the ins and outs of Net Neutrality and…

    • 1506 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays