Preview

Net Neutrality On The Internet

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
793 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Net Neutrality On The Internet
If big successful tech companies (who are specialists in that area) are against the legislation then obviously, the legislation isn't going to help the internet. It probably says something if Internet giants like Twitter, Wikipedia, Google and Facebook all disapprove of the legislation [4]. They don’t want to be held accountable and take the brunt force of the punishment for the faults of many of their users who themselves aren’t as pressured to comply with the laws. Keep in mind that these tech giants are hosts of millions of gigabytes of data and many of users so it’s not an easy task to keep track of who infringed on copyright. To not be held accountable, they’d have to change how they work at a huge level [4]. Those that support SOPA and …show more content…
This is a necessary regulation, but it begs the question: why does net neutrality matter? Net neutrality being enforced enables users to communicate freely over the internet. In other words, net neutrality forces internet service providers (ISPs) to follow an open access requirement that prohibits them from discriminating against content providers or charging extra fees based on preferential treatment [6]. This would thwart with tech startups and web services since they would have to pay more fees to be able to compete with larger tech companies [7]. It is the ISPs that stand to make a profit off of the legislation that would eliminate net neutrality and this would enable them to be in charge of calling the shots on the …show more content…
Now businesses can buy a web user’s personal information (medical, financial, credit card info) if the website they are browsing isn’t encrypted. Consumer’s personal information can be sold off to advertisers and big businesses from the ISPs without the ISPs having to ask that consumer for permission to do so [2]. Now that the regulation has been eliminated, ISPs can sell whatever sensitive info they want freely and advertisers can use that to better market towards consumers. While one can argue that they can avoid this problem by choosing a different ISP that claims they wouldn’t sell they consumers’ info off, it’s not the same for everyone. Some people don’t have much of an option to choose from regarding their ISPs because of their locations

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    We’ve spent a lot of time here at TLF talking about the sound economic arguments against net neutrality regulation. We argue that net neutrality regulation will result in worse consequences than leaving the internet relatively unregulated. But to me, the more important point is that net neutrality regulation is itself unjust.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jrlc Chapter 2 Pt. 1

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages

    I believe that eventually some form of net neutrality will have to be put in place to prevent censorship or any restrictions of content based on person-to-person or amount of money being paid for service.…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) is a U.S. House of Representatives bill with the stated purpose, "To promote prosperity, creativity, entrepreneurship, and innovation by combating the theft of U.S. property, and for other purposes." (1) SOPA proposes to accomplish those goals by allowing the U.S. Department of Justice and copyright owners to take action against websites thought to be facilitating copyright infringement.…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to Lin Ray, net neutrality means no bit of information should be prioritized over another (“VCU Blog”, 2014). The origin of information doesn’t matter. Due to net neutrality, there are no restrictions on the internet currently. In other words, we can have free communication. The entire source of the internet is freely available for normal web users. Losing the freedom of internet access could result in restricted access to websites; fewer download rights and so on. The topic of net neutrality has become controversial because several companies are trying to take away the freedom of internet access.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In recent years, there have been concerns about whether net neutrality will continue to be upheld by ISP’s (Schewick, 2009). This…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Net neutrality is vital if we care about preserving our rights in this ever-changing online culture. Jana Kasperkevic, in her essay “Net Neutrality: Explained,” gives a good analogy: “No net neutrality is like a taxicab refusing to take one customer but taking…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The question of who has rights to control what data flows thought the Internet and at what speed has been a question discussed within the US government since the late 1990's.(Gans, 2014 p. 183) The question has been should the internet providers be required to treat all data on their infrastructure as equivalent or should they be given the ability to prioritize some data types or sources over others. There have been several key decisions over the last 20 years and so far the US government and the FCC have stayed fairly consistent in their opinions and rulings, but the Internet providers are trying to make changes. Net neutrality is a vague term that can cover many aspects of the Internet itself, the service providers, content providers and…

    • 1904 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Kriens, S. (2006, November 29). Net Neutrality. Speech presented at Stanford Technology Venture Program, Stanford. Retrieved June 1, 2012, from http://ecorner.stanford.edu/authorMaterialInfo.html?mid=1638…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Net Neutrality Rules

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages

    On February 26, 2015, the Federal Communications Commission passed the Title II Net Neutrality rules. These rules will be enforced by the FCC and will protect the American people when it comes to the use of the Internet. Some people say that this is a major part of history because of the way the Internet has changed and enriched lifestyles. Research suggests that Net Neutrality will benefit all Internet users because it protects consumers against blocking of content, prevents throttling of all traffic, prevents favoritism to certain interests, and insures the customer's safety from prioritizing any specific content or traffic. These rules apply to all fixed and wireless internet providers in the United States, and Net Neutrality and its…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Net Neutrality

    • 3387 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Net Neutrality is a topic of debate and confusion in the United States. It draws supporters as diverse as the Christian Coalition and moveon.org, pits traditional telecommunications companies like Verizon and Comcast against Internet giants such as Yahoo! and Google, and gives politicians yet another platform to raise an ongoing liberal-conservative debate over government regulation. So what is all this talk about? Philosophically, Net Neutrality is an ethical framework to govern access to the Internet. It advocates no restrictions on content, sites, or platforms, on the kinds of equipment that may be attached, and on the modes of communication allowed. In 2005, the FCC embedded these principles into its policy with an objective to “encourage broadband deployment and preserve and promote the open and interconnected nature of the public Internet” (Policy Statement). This statement and proposed additional legislation is the source of continued controversy today. Fundamentally, the debate is grounded in opinions of necessity of Internet regulations and the repercussions of action or inaction. This paper will attempt to provide a context for the debate, a better understanding of the regulation and the possible implications, and a summary of the differing views.…

    • 3387 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    But, what the FCC isn’t taking into account is the millions of internet users that want to keep internet neutrality. With net neutrality maintained, users of the internet will have equal access to the internet, which will increase their total…

    • 1730 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    A writer for Wired, a technology focused magazine and website, even states, “Net neutrality is a dead man walking. The execution date isn’t set, but it could be days, or months (at best)” (Ammori). This is assumed quite a bit in part because the court systems that struck down the original FCC rules seems to be heavily in favor of corporations over the public interest. It also doesn’t help that ISPs are currently offering a false compromise with the FCC. The current rules that the FCC is voting on would allow the FCC to tell ISPs that they are not allowed to block sites entire for no reason, but they would be allowed to throttle any website for any reason of their choosing. This is very worrying, because as Marvin Ammori put it, “Once the court voids the nondiscrimination rule, AT&T, Verizon, and Comcast will be able to deliver some sites and services more quickly and reliably than others for any reason. Whim. Envy. Ignorance. Competition. Vengeance. Whatever. Or, no reason at all.” If our internet is controlled by the decisions of corporations we are in for a bleak future. Websites like Wikipedia, which provide a wealth of free information, would have trouble being able to provide their services to the public for free as they would be facing a set of fees assessed by each ISP based off of the amount of users that access their website. Free sites that share information with people…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “In 2001, the International Telecommunication Union calculated that, approximately 2.3 billion people had internet access at the end of that year. Since then, the percentage of people using the internet around the world has continued to grow” (Li 2). Censoring the internet has been a hot topic for quite a while now. Many people believe that censoring the web isn’t a good thing because of certain laws and rights we have as citizens. The internet has some cons but it also has many pros. The downside of the censorship is that the truth is blocked out and it violates our freedom of speech. On the other hand, censorship of the internet can reduce the numbers or even stop human trafficking, prevent identity theft, stop cyber bullying and so much…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It prevents them from making _ÑÒfast lanes,_Ñù or faster internet for extra money. What some people don_Ñét realize is that net neutrality gives people much more privacy than they probably realize. No one wants their private information or images exposed on the internet or to ISPs. Net Neutrality means a free, open internet for all consumers. And I, and most other people are perfectly happy with it.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Net Neutrality

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Net neutrality has become threatened as in April 2010 the U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that the Federal Communications Commission, or FCC, could not force ISPs to give equal treatment to all internet traffic passing over their networks. In December 2010, the FCC came up with a solution that ISPs can regulate usage based on whether the internet service provided was wired or wireless. For fixed broadband networks, ISPs cannot block any lawful content, services, or applications. Wireless providers, may not block any web sites, however they are allowed to block applications and services. Considering these new guidelines the author suggested that net neutrality was now net semi-neutrality.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics