Network Diagram

Several weaknesses of paper-based medical records have been identified, such as illegible handwriting, ambiguous and incomplete data, data fragmentation, and poor availability.1 In addition, paper records often become bulky with time, which leads to lack of overview. Because paper records still represent the usual medium for collecting and recording patient data, these weaknesses could impede the continuity and quality of care.
Allow for all medical offices to send, receive, and share data & resources throughout the network Upgrade all hardware/software to ensure network operability Allow scalability for growth of and on the network Merge all five medical offices without slowing down current service at any location Provide physical security in addition to complying with the current HIPPA laws Allow for a redundant connection Implement a plan for disaster recovery, backups, and how security will exist and be maintained

Medical institutions in america still would rather use paper to gather information from their patients and also to record surgical procedures, observations, and prescriptions. Some practitioners and physicians find accessing digital records somewhat complicated than obtaining a notepad and a pen.
In america, medical records are kept for seven years; for now, they can go on and dispose them. The thing that makes manual keeping of records very exhausting may be the mere undeniable fact that every day, a large number of new records are being stored in hospitals. It will be very complicated to sort medical records of all patients that keep increasing every minute. This complexity often arises to errors that will greatly get a new daily happenings in hospitals, clinics, and all sorts of other healthcare institutions. Aside from being time-consuming, collating records can be hard if you have no main paperback that may contain all information.
Electronic medical records eliminate these complaints. With electronic permanent medical record, physicians