America would be much different if the Bill of Rights was not in the Constitution to protect the rights of the citizens. Amendment nine gives a lot of rights to the citizens in the Bill of Rights. The ninth amendment protects the rights of the citizens that are not listed in the Constitution and in the Bill of Rights. The ninth amendment in the Bill of Rights says, "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." This means that the Constitution mentions certain rights but not all and even rights not listed still belong to the people. In the video, the father has to vote for the already elected president or else he would get arrested. The father has the right…
The first eight amendments in the Bill of Rights were intended to protect Americans ' specific personal rights. The Founding Fathers recognized the importance of these rights and fought so that the people in the United States would have the independence that no other nation had known. These same men were well aware of the unavoidable sacrifices they were going to have to make. Listing every right that a person should possess was impossible to fit into ten amendments. Therefore, congress made the final two amendments in the Bill of Rights to be an all inclusive statute in an effort to prevent the United States government from discovering a loophole and gaining too much power. The Ninth and Tenth Amendments are the final two statutes in the Bill of Rights which outlines the limited control of the government and even more importantly the power of the people.…
The first clause of Amendment Six is the speedy trial clause. There are several reasons that this clause is positive to the accused in a case on trial. Primarily the right to a speedy trial can prevent undue and oppression, and minimize the anxiety and concern that accompanies public accusation. A speedy trial can limit the possibility that long delay will impair the ability of an accused to defend himself. Furthermore, delaying a trial is can tamper with the evidence and witnesses because over time evidence can lose value and witnesses could forget what happened at the the crime scene or even die before the trial takes place. The right of a speedy trial can also be in opposition to the interests of the accused because it can cause the accused…
This article talked about how the students of UC Berkeley were protesting against a speech being given at their school, and how the sponsors of this group were forced to pay $15,000 in security fees. Then on top of that fee the school paid an additional $600,000 to create cemented barriers and have armed forces on campus during the meeting. Personally I feel these precautions were unnecessary however due to the way students were reacting it had to be done. Another subject brought up in the article was the fact that 44 percent of students said that the First Amendment does not protect "hate speech", 51 percent said that they would be in favor of students speaking out against a speaker "known for making offensive and hurtful statements" and 19 percent of students said the use of violence against controversial speakers is acceptable. This information frustrates me because freedom of speech is black and white, personal opinions shouldn’t interfere with our rights.…
Every U.S. jurisdiction has its own regulations regarding what, precisely, must be said to a person arrested or placed in a custodial situation. The typical warning states:[3]…
The following Amendment proposes to prohibit the early release of violent criminals in the United States. Two main reasons why violent criminals are released early from prison are the over crowding of prisons and the high expense to keep someone incarcerated. However, the results of releasing violent criminals early have proven to be detrimental to society. This amendment proposal urges the government to protect society from violent criminals by condemning their early release; early release should not be an option.…
Should the Constitution be amended to limit representatives, senators, and members of the judiciary to 12 years of total service?…
18th Amendment. The 18th Amendment is a change to the constitution that vetoed the making, transporting, and selling of alcoholic beverages. It was ratified in January of 1919 and repealed in December of 1933 ,making it the only amendment in history to be rescinded. Alcohol was known as a threat to the nation by many people in the 20th century, therefore alcohol consumption became prohibited throughout a number of states. The amount of consumption of alcohol had entirely reduced, and so had the amount of alcohol related deaths. But there were not only positive outcomes of this amendment; the black market ascended, and so did the amount of neglect to the law. During the Industrial Revolution, alcoholism had become clarified by more of its negative…
This research paper is on the topic of 21st amendment of the U.S. constitution it explains what the 21st amendment is, how the 18th amendment also known as the prohibition era came to be and how the 21st amendment came to directly appeal the 18th amendment ending the prohibition. Also how the state’s power to directly control all aspects of alcohol within their borders, and this may impede on other amendments or clauses in the constitution, and how The Supreme Court changed their ruling on the 21st amendment over the years by letting states have all the power and then taking back some of the state’s powers. The federal government…
The Fourteenth Amendment was a direct outgrowth of the national debate over slavery1, and the subsequent emancipation of the slaves during the Civil War. In the aftermath of that war, Congress confronted a number of thorny issues: what would be done about the rebel leaders? Would the defeated states contribute to paying off the Union’s debts? Would slave owners be compensated for the loss of their property? What measures would be required of the defeated states as a condition of their full re-admittance to the Union? Two cases that took place before the creation of the Fourteenth Amendment are particularly important, considering that in a way or another they would help shape this Amendment: Barron vs. Baltimore and Dred Scott vs. Sanford.…
Can you think if your president had more than two terms???Well I can because Barack has leaded us into the right path for our future. He helped to lower taxes and helped us a little bit with our debt crisis. So Obama should want to choose how many times he wants to be president because if he wants to make this a better place he’s going to have to keep moving forward. So there shall not be any amendment limiting the presidential terms.…
Why? You have two distinct advantages in the House that you don't have in the Senate: (1) you are a senior and respected member, and (2) a block of House members already supports the amendment. If you succeed in the House, your odds of also succeeding in the Senate are increased because the House vote may convince many skeptical senators.…
The Bill of Rights holds 27 Amendments that are all very beneficial to how our country works and makes decisions. Altering or taking away these amendments could be detrimental to our country’s well-being and take away our basic rights as American citizens. Adding new amendments may be beneficial because of the constant change in our country that needs adapting to and guidelines with ways to manage the new changes. An amendment likely to be made in the future after Mr. Donald Trump’s term(s) might be enforcing gun control and repealing the 2nd Amendment. I say this because even though more than half of the population does not want to have gun control, the other ¼ do, and will most likely find a way to get what they want. Another amendment that might be made is a ban against abortions.…
There are many individuals and groups alike that choose to express their disdain for certain actions, laws, and behaviors through the use of Freedom of Speech. The First Amendment has been cited by many protesters when demonstrating that it is their right to Freedom of expression. Freedom of Expression is powerful enough that sometimes words do not have to be spoken for a message to be conveyed. However, not all acts are protected by the First Amendment. For example, burning the flag is protected under the First Amendment but promoting the benefits of marijuana at a school event would be protected (U.S. Courts, n.d). If by chance there is a question of constitutionality regarding the First Amendment, it is usually linked to the overbreadth doctrine. Simply meaning, an individual may feel that their rights and/or others rights to Freedom of Speech may be prohibited by laws when applied under the context in which they were written. Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601 (1973) is the most quoted case that addresses issues of the overbreadth doctrine as it pertains to the First Amendment.…
If any given history buff were to ask anyone on the street who the 7th president was, or what the significance of the 14th amendment is, would they be able to answer either question correctly? Would any high school students be able to answer them correctly? Although these seem like silly and random questions, they both have shaped America and it is a significant part of our history. These days, there are many people who don’t- or don’t care to know the history; whether it generally as humans or specifically as Americans. But, it is so important to know history to understand our standing in the world, and why it is this way. Generally speaking, each social studies class educates on different aspects; there are specific classes to learn laws…