Preview

New Deviancy and Labeling Theory

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1096 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
New Deviancy and Labeling Theory
New Deviancy notes for Assignment!

New deviancy theory emerged in the 1960s and early 1970s. It was primarily a radical response to positivist domination of criminology (that crime is the result of individual, physical, and social conditions).
The new deviancy theorists believed in free will and creativity. According to this theory, crime is that behaviour which violates the interests of the powerful. The definition of crime or deviance depends upon two activities: one, an act of an individual or a group, and second, another individual or group with different values must label the initial activity as deviant.

Human beings constantly generate their own system of values. Within a pluralistic society, certain groups termed as "the powerful", "the bureaucracy", "the moral entrepreneurs" with more power than others impose their values upon the less powerful, labelling those who infringe their rules with tags of 'deviants ' or 'criminals '.

Thus, people who evolve different values or experiment with various forms of behaviour are labelled by the authorities as 'an alcoholic ', 'a homosexual ', 'a drug addict ', 'a thief ', 'a psychopath ' and so on.
For example, a college girl who may be good at studies and is likely to get a position in the university examination but because she conceives without being married would be labelled an unwed-mother or a deviant girl. An officer, who may be very efficient hard-working and competent but if he takes alcohol every day, would be labelled an alcoholic.

In explaining the causes of crime, people usually talk about motivation, i.e., why a person indulges in a deviant act. They hold that the basic difference between one who deviates and one who conforms lies in the character of their motivations. Thus, psychological theories find the cause of deviant motivations or acts in the individual 's early experiences.

Sociological theories look for socially structured sources of strain ' in society, or social positions

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    When studying crime and deviance, in particular the causes of crime, it is often useful to look at the reasons behind why people commit crimes in the first place. For interactionists, crime and deviance is a product of labelling. They believe that when a crime is committed, it is because a public application of a negative description of a powerless individual has occurred and that is the reason why a crime has been committed by that individual. Labelling is deterministic of your future life. Interactionists reject official statistics on crime, seeing them as little more than a social construction. They maintain that they vastly underestimate the extent of crime and do not present an accurate picture of crime in society.…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Howard Becker argued that deviance is not a quality of the act person commits, but rather a consequence of the application by others of the rules and sanctions to an “offender”, the deviant has been successfully associated with the label which means that the deviant behaviour is behaviour people label. Due to an individual being labelled it can have possible effects as a label defines a person as being a particular character and as it is not neutral, it has master status. Because of this an individual may internalise the label leading to self fulfilling prophecy. This may encourage further deviance. For example, drug addicts may turn to crime to support their habit since “respectable employers” refuse to give them a job. Becker argued that once individuals joined an organised deviant group, they are more likely to see themselves as a deviant and act in terms of this self- concept.…

    • 916 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Studies such that by Jock and Young (1971); exemplify Becker’s claim that there is no such thing as deviant behaviour. Interpretivist sociologists (interactionist) argue that we form our self-identity by interpreting how others respond to us and internalising the reaction. A label can have positive and negative effects on an individual and it helps define them in the ‘eyes’ of others. Becker calls this the ‘self-concept’. Interactionist theory suggests that being labelled as deviant can actually increase deviant behaviour. For example if a person is in trouble with the police then they are more likely to resort to criminal activity or criminal behaviour. Jock Young (1971) used his study of drug users in Notting hill to demonstrate the process of becoming deviant. The studies showed 4 different stages. Firstly, the marijuana users developed a deviant self-concept because their drug of choice was illegal; then the deviant element became their main identity in society. They were considers ‘hippies’ first and foremost ; then the negative response of those around them and the police made the drug taking a significant part of their live and then their…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Becker emphasises the significance of crime being a social construct; an action only becomes criminal or deviant once society has labelled it so, and thus crime can be argued to be a social construction. He introduced the concept of a master label, referring to the label which a person is given which overrides all other labels. When a person is labelled as negatively, society tends to tend them as such, and this master label often becomes internalised, and thus a self-fulfilling prophecy occurs. The person accepts their label as a criminal or deviant, and this then leads to further crime as the person attempts to live up to their label. Young studied ‘hippie’ marijuana users in the 1970’s, and found support of Beckers idea of the master label. As they were labelled negatively by the police and further rejected by society, the hippies used their criminal identity as drug users to associate with one another, and distinguish themselves from society. This shows how the police and society caused deviancy amplification as the hippies increasingly used drugs because it became difficult for them to be accepted into ‘normal’ society due to their negative label. Chambliss conducted further research into this area, including his study of two all-boy subcultures in an American high school; the Saints and the Roughnecks. The Saints were 8 middle class boys and the Roughnecks were 6 working class boys. Both committed similar levels of delinquent behaviour but the Roughnecks were labelled and punished significantly more by the police and…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Deviancy is not a quality of the act a person commits but rather a consequence of the application by others of rules and sanctions to an ‘offender’. Deviant behaviour is behaviour that people so label.”…

    • 1194 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    4. Clinard, B., M., & Meier, F., R. (2011). Sociology: Sociology of Deviant Behavior, (Edition 14). Cengage Learning, Belmont, CA.…

    • 1971 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter Outline

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * The label an individual permanently as deviant is to place him or her outside the pale of human relations as a social pariah.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mr Stefan Sledmore

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Pease (1994) said, ‘Crime comprises those actions which are deemed so damaging to the interest of the community that the state determines that it must take a direct role in identifying and acting against the criminal.’ Downes and Rock (1998) said ‘Deviance may be considered as banned or controlled behaviour which is likely to attract punishment or disproval.’ In short, ‘Deviance’ is a asocial construct that can change across time and place and ‘Crime’ is an action that breaks the law.…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    By applying the theories of crime and deviance, one may see why such a pattern of positivity may decrease. The theories of deviance and crime are…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    susceptible to being judged by society. Sometimes the most innocent beings, are looked upon as…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People consider an act to be a deviance act because of the three sociological theories: control theory, labeling theory and strain theory. It deeply reflected in the movie called "Menace II Society".…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Howard Becker is a sociologist that is often credited with the development of the labelling theory. However the origins of this theory can be traced back to sociologists at the beginning of the twentieth century who made invaluable contributions to the creation of the “labelling” concept. The first was Charles Cooley who wrote “Human Nature and the Social Order” in 1902, in which he introduced the term the “looking glass self”. This idea suggests that an individual will respond to society based on how the individual thinks society perceives them. Another was Frank Tannenbaum (1938) who studied juvenile participation in street gangs. He argued that when society defines certain behaviour as deviant, a “tag” is then placed upon the individual that displayed the deviant behaviour, thus causing further deviant / criminal behaviour. Although Cooley and Tannenbaum influenced Becker it was the much later influence of Edwin Lamert that truly led the way. Lemert was, by many of his peers, credited with introduction of the ‘original’ version of the labelling theory. In Lemert’s 1951 publication, “Social Pathology” he states that primary deviance is the original offence that causes a figure in authority to “label” the offender as deviant. Furthermore he states that if said offender accepts the deviant “label” offered to them, this will result in further deviance, known as secondary deviance. This may then lead to a “self- fulfilling prophecy” causing the individual to live up to their deviant label.…

    • 1985 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deviant Question Paper

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages

    (c) Explain why some groups in society are more likely to have the power to label others as deviant. [6]…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Labeling Theory Of Crime

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Labeling theory proposes that a deviant label given to a person by society can be given after a person commits a crime and proceeds to be active in delinquent activities because of the label or the label brought onto that person can cause them to commit the crime the label describes (Akers, Sellers, & Jennings, 2017). In 1951, Edwin M. Lemert created the terms primary and secondary deviance. Primary deviance is meant to be before the label is given to a person and seems to be unorganized and inconsistent (Akers, Sellers, & Jennings, 2017). People who commit primary deviance are normally found to be conventional citizens, however after they have committed crime and society has labeled them this turns into secondary deviance, which people would not have engaged in if the label society gave them was never assigned (Akers, Sellers, & Jennings, 2017;…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gender Norms

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages

    3. Deviance: This sociological concept determines the ways in which a person or group of persons violates the social rules and it occurs due to varied cultures. The deviance in this case occurred when Mich wanted to be a male.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays