Philip Hone was born on October 25th 1780 in Dutch Street, New York. Hone was an hard working individual who at seventeen years old started his mercantile career. He would later progress to the auction business and began to make most of his well from this partnership. Hone traveled to places such as Europe but then decided to return home to New York. This is when he was when he began his political career and elected as mayor in 1826 and served one term. Hone political identified as a federalist at first but then changed to the Whig Party.…
Nixon’s plan, known as New Federalism, was to distribute a portion of federal power to state and local governments.…
Ronald Reagan was Born on February 6th 1911 in Tampico Illinois. Ronald was from the Irish descent. When he was little we went by the name “Dutch” because he didn't like the name his parents gave him. Ronald went on to college at Eureka College on a athletic scholarship. Ronald was the governor of california before he ran for president and he lost the first time he ran.…
In the 1970s regulated federalism began to build up steam as for how our new form of federalism would operate. In this new method, of regulated federalism, congress would pass laws requiring states and localities to follow through with out a choice or say in the matter. This is contrast to cooperative federalism as the federal government did not directly force states and localities to follow through, but if they did not they would not receive government grants and funding in that certain area. However, the government did have good reason for this practice, they wanted to create more unity and uniformity between the states, “The effect of these national standards is that state and local policies in the areas of environmental protection, social services, and education are more uniform from coast to coast than are other nationally funded policies”(WTP 94).…
Federalist and Anti-Federalist perspectives at first tend to appear to be polar opposites in nature. The Federalists supported and sought to ratify the Constitution of the United States of America. Whereas the Anti-Federalists were hesitant to do so, and feared that the powers allotted in the Constitution would result in the newly birthed United States descending into a monarchy. The very same form of government that had proved dissatisfactory to the colonists in the first place. Therefore it may appear to be a moot point when deciding whether both viewpoints would be in harmony or opposition in regards to the power held by the modern presidency. The Anti-Federalists believed that power should rest with the states. However the Federalists wanted a strong central government headed by one official. This was because the Articles of Confederation (which gave the majority of power to the states) had failed miserably. However, while the Federalists and Anti-Federalists held opposite viewpoints, they had the same goal in mind: To create a free and balanced society, “It is here taken for granted, that all agree in this, that whatever government we adopt, it ought to be a free one,” (Brutus, 25). However, due to the initial ambiguous measure the framers of the Constitution took with regards to the executive branch, there have historically been events of a United States President overstepping his boundaries and violating the merits of both U.S. and Constitutional doctrine. Therefore both the Federalists as well as the Anti-Federalists would agree that in light of decisions made during George W. Bush’s consecutive terms that the modern presidency must be restricted.…
The Cold War took off after the end of the Second World War when the United States and the Soviet Union emerged as the two global dominant superpowers each grasping ideologies that were dichotomous from each other. This adverse relationship continued for half a century and the clash of two distinct and differing political ideologies of communism and capitalism saw no clear conclusion or victory for either side. The tense atmosphere resonated not only in the United States and the Soviet Union, but also around the world and into space. For most of the fifty years of the cold war, the ideological struggle and the many indirect physical conflicts between the West and the Soviet Union were in a deadlock with no visible success of either side. However,…
But WHY? Why has the power of the federal government expanded so significantly? Was this shift in power from state governments to the federal government necessary?…
How is it we see a distinct change in how federalism is portrayed and influenced with every new style of government? The way problems and politics have influenced federalism suggests that the manipulation of politics and world influences in fact changes the fundamentals and delivery of a federal model. It is apparent that a federal model 90 years ago represents little of what the new and emerging models are or may become. Between both major political parties we have seen a separation in the way our federal nation would operate. Federalism has been strongly shaped by party ideology and platforms. (Hollander and Papatan 2007) suggest that the changes in our federalism model is keeping the cutting edge of reform, finally seeing the progress being made towards a better way to conduct business. Difficulties with effecting reform will be that someone has to lose out. Both involve trade-offs of efficiency with equity and will face opposition by those adversely affected.…
A presidential doctrine, in this way, can be characterized as a gathering of practices or standards, which are implemented by a President to a given government. A President, or with the assistance of his advisors, can define such doctrines, which are then connected with the president. Nonetheless, is essential to note that Presidents don't distribute or make their doctrines official, however other individuals, for example, political rivals or columnists recognize and name presidential doctrines.…
We Federalist’s believe that the government needs to be divided into three parts, with equal powers and balances and checks, for it to work effectively. Now the Anti-Federalist’s believe that we are trying to give all power to the larger states in the North and ignore the needs of our brethren the South states. We are not. We are just trying to create a fair government.…
Over the last twenty-five years, federalism has transformed due to the increase in federal mandates on state and local governments. Federalism refers to a political system in which there are local units of government, as well as a national government, that can make final decisions with respect to at least some governmental activities, and whose existence is protected. When the Framers devised this political system their goal was to protect personal liberty and create a separation of powers. Over the years, federalism 's goal of decentralization evolved giving states more leeway. Mandates, however, have in a way, increased federal power, imposing requirements and/or conditions for obtaining federal grants. These mandates provided federal restrictions on states ' economic actions and have served the former purpose of protecting personal liberties because they usually concern civil rights and environmental protection. The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, for example, shows how federalism has changed and how mandates have augmented the regulation of state and local governments ' actions.…
Both sides had strong opinions and beliefs on the subject, but the side that I thought was more convincing was the Federalists side. I think the Federalists were right when they said America was in need of a stronger national government. If our government were to become weak, like the Anti-Federalists wanted, then our world would become a chaotic mess, the rules wouldn’t apply to everyone. I think that you need to have rules and laws to keep people in check, if we didn’t have them then everyone and everything would become crazy.…
The National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA) was an act designed to regulate industry in an attempt to stimulate economic recovery after experiencing severe deflation. Along with that, it was supposed to help set up maximum work hours, and minimum wages, while encouraging collective bargaining for unions. In my opinion, the act was successful because it was one of the acts established in Roosevelt’s first 100 days, and it may have been strict, but did amongst other things help to stimulate the economy. And the goals of setting up maximum working hours was eventually reached, and minimum wage was also established in 1938. Can be categorized as a recovery act.…
The Federalist Era was a time in our history from 1789 to 1800 when the federal government would confront civil rebellions, threats of recession, international intrigues, and foreign wars. During this time, there were many economic, social, and political problems, as well as conflicts and events that later influenced and impacted future events in U.S history. The economic problem of our national debt, the social problem of the division of the country about slavery, and the many political problems led to the creation of a national bank, the civil war, and prevented a war with Britain.…
In the words of Roosevelt, "I pledge you, I pledge myself, to a new deal for the American people." Franklin D. Roosevelt was elected into office in one of American History’s darkest hours, the Great Depression. He jumped into a dark, dismal place full of economic depression and citizens looking for someone to rescue them. FDR proposed a “new deal” to help the country out of its turmoil. Using, what came to be known as, the 3 Rs, relief, recovery and reform, Roosevelt would implement a legislative package that would be the blueprint for modern government.…