Do You Need a New Product-Development Strategy?
Aligning Process With Context
There is no one-size-fits-all product-development process; designing new products for different business contexts requires different new-product development processes.
Alan MacCormack, William Crandall, Paul Henderson, and Peter Toft
OVERVIEW: Many firms rely on a single new-product development process for all projects. But designing new products for different business contexts requires that a firm deploy different new-product development processes. Products designed for stable and mature end-user markets require a process optimized for control and efficiency. In contrast, first-of-a-kind "breakthrough" products require a more emergent process that aims to discover whether there is any market to be served in the first place. Applying a uniform "best-practice" process to all development efforts ignores the major differences between these projects and may result in missed opportunities. This article describes a framework to address this problem, allowing a firm to better align the design of its development processes to the specific aims of individual projects. We illustrate this framework with examples from Hewlett-Packard, a large, diversified electronics firm that has successfully piloted this new approach across multiple business units, KEYWORDS: Product development. Process design, Stage-Gate® processes, Agile development processes
Over the past decade, firms have invested millions of dollars to define and standardize the way they bring new products and services to market. Despite these investments, however, studies of new product success rates have shown little or no improvement (Griffin 1997; Adams and Boike 2004), Indeed, recent data suggest that firms
struggle more than ever to develop and launch new products on time with acceptable features, cost, and quality (Christensen 1997), And remarkably, some of these firms blame the very processes designed to
References: Abernatby, W. J., and Utterback, J. 1978. Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology Review 80: 41-47. Adams, M., and Boike, D. 2004. PDMA foundation CPAS study reveals new trends. PDMA Visions Magazine 28(3): 26-29. Christensen, C M . 1997. The Innovator 's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Christensen, C. M. 2003. The Innovator 's Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Cooper, R. G. 1990. Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products. Business Horizons 33(3): 44-54. Cusutnano, M. A., and Selby, R. W. 1995. Microsoft Secrets. New York, NY: Free Press. Cusumano, M. A., and Yoffie, D. 1998. Competing on Internet Time. New York, NY: Free Press. De Meyer, A., Loch, C. H., and Pich, M. T. 2002. Managing project uncertainty: From variation to cha )s. Sloan Management Review '^1(2): 60-67. Eisenhardt, K., and Sull, D. 2001. Strategy as |itmple rules. HarvardBusiness Review 79( 1): 107-116. Garvin, D. A., and Levesque, L. C. 2006. Meet ng the challenge of corporate entrepreneurship. Harvard Business Review 84(10): 102-112, 150. Griffin, A. 1997. PDMA research on new product developtnient practices: Updating trends and benchmarking best practices. Journal of Product Innovation Management 14: 429—458. Henderson, R. M., and Clark, K. B. 1990. Arel itectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing systems and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 9-30. Lenfle, S., and Loch, C. H. 2010. Lost roots: How project management came to etnphasize control ov( r flexibility and novelty. California Management Review 53(1 : 32-55. Loch, C. H., De Meyer, A., and Pich, M. T. 2C 06. Managing the Unknown: A New Approach to Managing Higfi Uncertainty and Risk in Projects. Hoboketi, NJ: Wiley. MacCormack, A. D. 2001. Product-developtn . 'tit practices that work: How Internet cotnpanies build soft vare. Sloan Management Review 42{2): 75-84. MacCormack, A., and Verganti, R. 2003. Managing the sources of uncertainty: Matching process and cor text in software development. The Journal of Product Innovation Management 20: 217-232. MacCormack, A., Verganti, R., atid Iansiti, V. 2001. Developing products on "Intemet time": The ana otny of a flexible development process. Management Science 47(1): 133-150. March, J. 1991. Exploration and exploitation n organizational learning. Organization Science 2(1): 71-87. O 'Reilly, C , and Tiishman, M. L. 2004. The an bidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review 82{A): 74-81. Sommer, S. C , Loch, C. H., and Dotig, J. 2009. Managing complexity and unforeseeable uncertainty in st irtup companies: An empirical study. Organization Science 20(I): 118-133. Tushman, M. L., and Anderson, P. 1986. Technological discontinuities and organizational environmen IS. Administrative Science Quarterly 3: 439-465. Utterback, J. M. 1996. Mastering the Dynamics àf Innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Utterback, J. M., and Suarez, F. 1991. Innova ion, competition and industry structure. Research Policy 22: -I- 1 . 2 Valdez, F. 2004. HP calculators and the strategic touch tnodcl: Proven business success, great future poteitial, HP Internal White Paper. September 15. VonHippel, E. 1988. The Sources of Innovation. O:xford, UK: Oxford University Press. Online version available ¡it http://web.mit. edu/evhippel/www/sources.htm (accessed C ctober 20, 201 1 ). Westerman, G., McFarlan, F. W., and Iansiti, M. 2006. Organization design and effectiveness over the ir novation lile cycle. Organization Science 17(2): 230-238. Wheelwright, S. C , and Clark, K. B. 1992. Re 'olutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency, and Quality. New York, NY: Free Press. Do You Need a New Product-Development Strategy? January—Fe:>ruary 20.12 | 43 Copyright of Research Technology Management is the property of Industrial Research Institute, Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder 's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.