Based on the essay “Is Google Making Us Stupid” written by Nicholas Carr, my opinion is that I agree with Carr’s thesis that the internet is interrupting human life. My opinion is that the internet is causing more problems than solving them. For example, I understand that the internet has websites like Wikipedia and other online sources that can help someone write a report on a war or side with a certain group about something. But, sometimes these articles on these websites can be changed by anyone who wants to. These articles sometimes have no facts that jump out to the reader.…
This comical take on the socialization of the Internet is extreme. Today, we need both pond-skaters and scuba divers; we need to master the ability to access facts while reserving time and space to do something meaningful with them. It is true our technologies are changing us, but in ways we can neither anticipate nor control. Because of the instant access to the Internet, we are able to get answers faster and more efficiently; this gives us an advantage toward learning, and in return can affect us. Overall I feel that if the Internet is being overused, therefore there may be long term gradual effects. I’m willing to take risk the chance, if I’m learning; soaking up new information in the process. Lastly, Carr says: "As we come to rely on computers to mediate our understanding of the world, it is our own intelligence that flattens into artificial intelligence." This may be true, if you wrongly abuse your sources of information; just as anything can be misused. Take and use what we have when we need it, not just only when we want it and have to have…
Today, many people find themselves using the Internet for almost everything. In fact, our society would probably have a very difficult time without access to the Web. It is an easy and convenient way to find what we are looking for, but has humanity become dependent on it? Has it turned our brains into mesh? Some say the modern generation is lazy, and the Internet is to blame for this. Contrary to that argument, access to technology has tremendously improved our world in many ways. The real concern arises from Nicholas Carr’s, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Carr grabs the attention of most, if not all, the viewers of this title, as he uncovers his highly critical article of the Internet’s effect on cognition.…
In the speech delivered at the Harvard Book Store Nicholas Carr, an American writer interested mainly in technology and business, presented his new book “The Shallows. What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains”. The writer explained also the main thesis of his work, which seems to be the following: Using the Internet has an impact on our brain and the way it is functioning. His arguments, not against the Internet in general, but against overusing it, are the result of his personal experience as well as the scientific studies on the topic.…
Many people use the Internet in their everyday lives, but they do not understand the negative aspect that it has in their lives. In Nicholas Carr’s article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” he explains to us how the Internet affects our brains in a negative way. Some people disagree with Carr and say that the Internet is just a resource that we use in our everyday lives and it does not affect us negatively. Even though the internet has many positive aspects, the internet affects us more negatively in our everyday life.…
In his essay “Is google making us stupid” Nicholas Carr explains how the internet has helped us to gather vast amounts of information very quick, but also how it has affected our attention span when the time comes to read long pieces of texts. Carr also feels that our brains are constantly getting rewired due to the amount of time we spend online has caused him to lose concentration when he is reading. Besides, make it easier to find information and rewiring our brains the internet has changed the way we comprehend what we are reading. Carr states that before the internet he could easily get caught in the argument of what he was reading and that he no longer does it because his concentration starts to drift away after reading a couple of pages.…
Cornell W. Clayton argues that rather than addressing incivility, Americans should focus on the “substantive sources of political conflict”. This would change the entire tone of the conversation because there would be no incivility mentioned in his essay. Most of his essay is showing the reader about the incivilities that had happened in the past. Clayton informs the reader that incivility can be ended, and Americans should focus on causes of division today because it will effect the future. The tone of the conversation would be very different. It would be more positive than negative because there will be solutions for causes of divisions. He writes, “I dislike uncivil behavior, and I believe it says more about the louts who engage in it than…
By reading the five different topic articles I began to see the writing style of Carr. In all five stories he always referred back to his main point. Although, he may have slightly drifted away with detail from what he started his article with, he always came back to put together what he was saying from the beginning. His style of writing is unique in ways he grabs his reader’s attention and speaks of the issue. The three articles that I felt grabbed my attention the most were “Chasing Armstrong With The Truth”, “This American Life’ Looks at a High School Marooned in Violence”, and “Buffeted by the Web, but Now Riding It”. In all three he started his articles in such a way that would grab someone’s attention without intentionally giving away what exactly the story is about. He uses an alternative method to correspond his first point to his main point.…
Sometimes, many people have been saying that because the internet is our issues and it make us stupid, people need to avoid using the internet. They say that using the Internet is negative with several reasons. Nicholas Carr is the one of them, who see the Internet as negative, and he authored a magazine article entitled "Is Google Making Us Stupid? What the Internet is doing to our brains" (alternatively "Is Google Making Us Stupid?"). Carr explains that the negative impact of the Internet on humans based on his experience and the opinions of other scholars. His main argument is that the Internet has changed the way people read and think, and the use of the Internet harms reading and thinking skills. His argument is, however, based on his…
Nicholas Carr in The Shallows: What the Internet is Doing to our Brains (2010) asserts that the internet is the single most powerful mind-altering technology. Carr supports this assertion by giving various, significant examples of how people think with the internet today compared to how they thought back then. The writer concludes in order for people to improve skills, they will have to cope with the new technology and the way they think.…
In Nicholas Carr’s book, “The Shallows: What The Internet is Doing to our Brains,” he makes the powerful point that in order to assume technology’s power, especially intellectual technology, we must pay a particularly high price. Carr states this idea in one quote from his book, “The price we pay to assume technologies power is alienation. The toll can be particularly high with our intellectual technologies. the tools of the mind amplify and in turn numb the most intimate, the most human, of our natural capacities- those for reason perception, memory, emotion(pg 211).” This price for intellectual technologies can range from a lowered ability to pull up memorized information, a shorter attention span, having a harder time learning new information, or even a changed perception of our world. All of these points help show how the internet is affecting our brains physically and mentally.…
"Is Google Making Us Stupid?" by Nicholas Carr illustrates to me that the internet is slowing down the development of our brain. I agree with his argument that technology has affected out attention span, he sets an example of how we now cannot concentrate on the readings, Scott Karp, and Bruce Friedman, both agree that their ability to read long articles has been affected by the web. Also, I agree with Carr that we are becoming low thinking people because the internet gives us easy access to have quick information research. However, I think that Google and the internet are actually helping us to learn new information. It is because when the computers are not here, we do all things by hand. If you want to know what a word means, you would need to get a dictionary. If you want to look up something that your teacher mentioned in class, but you don't know what it is, or how does it look like. Then, you would have to find the encyclopedia to look for it. In nowadays, we do everything by computer, communicate with people, blogging, searching, watch videos, etc. We can learn new information quickly by searching from the internet. As Carr said, "It [the Net] injects the medium’s content with hyperlinks, blinking ads, and other digital gewgaws, and it surrounds the content with the content of all the other media it has absorbed. A new e-mail message, for instance, may announce its arrival as we’re glancing over the latest headlines at a newspaper’s site" (Carr 62). They take away our concentration, when we are reading an article there are lots of ads, hyperlinks, which would take our attentions. Thus, we will go to another website and look for other stuffs.…
The article called Does the Internet Make You Dumber by Nicholas Carr states that, “The Internet grants us easy access to unprecedented amounts of information. Growing body of scientific evidence suggest that the Net, with its constant distractions and interruptions, is also turning us into scattered and superficial thinkers” (1). Carr states in his article that the Internet affects people in a negative way, messing with their attention and memory. Carr also states how focused you are affects your personality, your memory, and your thoughts. One of the studies Carr looked at was conducted by a neuroscientist named Michael Merzenich. He said, “He was profoundly worried about the cognitive consequences of the constant distraction and interruptions the Internet bombards us with” (2).…
The 1st claim that Nicholas Carr makes is that Internet causes distraction. He talks about his claim with his personal examples. Carr said that the internet is full of distraction like ads, hyperlinks and anything that can distract us. ‘’He gives the example of someone reading the latest headlines in a newspaper site when suddenly a new e-mail messages announces its arrival with tone of some sort he says that the result is to scatter our attention and diffuse our concentration.’’ It’s not only on the internet but it can also be on TV shows, and newspapers. ‘’He says as people’s minds become attuned to the crazy quilt of internet media, traditional media have to adapt to the audience’s new expectations, Carr says that this change has led TV shows to add text crawls and pop-ups.’’…
Technology can change the way humans live in daily lives, the way we learn and the way we use our faculties of attention. In the articles, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?: What the Internet is doing to our brains” and “Is Google wrecking our memory?” Nicholas Carr and Clive Thompson discusses that humans being are taking over by the use of technology and is affected major parts of our social lives. Carr argues that internet is just a set for people to make money, and how our critical thinking skills and attention span is degrading. While Thompson argues that using technology is an advantage for people to learn more in different ways such as storing information. According to the reading, both authors agree that technology is popular in individuals…