Preview

Nicolas Romanov's Effective Ruler

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
997 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nicolas Romanov's Effective Ruler
Nicolas Romanov was not at all a very effective or strong leader. Above anything, he did not do anything to help the peasants who took up 84 percent of the country, and barely ever had enough food for the family. The peasant population was constantly increasing and Nicholas did nothing to help it. Another poor quality is that he secretly supplied the Black Hundred with weapons, used to eliminate anyone again the autocracy. Because he became so against the idea of the Duma, he became a much less caring ruler.
In May of of 1896, Nicholas Romanov was going to be crowned the new tsar of Russia. Because Nicholas’ father, Alexander, was a very stern leader, and Nicholas was known to be much more reserved, his coronation was a major deal to everyone in Russia. Thousands of people came from across the country to be there, and be given the gifts and beer they’d been expecting. However, a rumor began very
…show more content…
They believed he was a messenger of God and a healer. Empress Alexandra especially believed in him. After being told she was pregnant, she decided that from that point on, she’d “blindly throw open the palace doors to any stranger who claimed to have holy powers” (Fleming, 53). This made it very easy for Rasputin to become close to her. He then began to take advantage of that, continuing to give himself a bigger role in Russia and the royal family.
When a protest started on International Women’s Day at the Winter Palace in 1917, the Cossacks were set standing guard. Along with the numerous women that showed up, thousands of male workers joined them. They continued to strike calling for an end to the war. The Cossack Guards were supposed to fire, but most decided not to. They showed sympathy toward the crowd rather than listening to the tsar. This was turning point because more and more people, including Russian Soldiers, were beginning to fall away from the idea of Russian

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Czar Nicholas was famous for his autocratic ideas, meaning that he theoretically had total power. His autocratic belief led to an ineffective rule. Nicholas II was the leader of the Russian Empire; however, he was not prepared for the tremendous obligations of administration. The Britannica article, “Nicholas II” claims, “Neither by upbringing nor by temperament was Nicholas fitted for the complex tasks that awaited him as autocratic ruler of a vast empire.” This suggests that Czar Nicholas’s rule was doomed from the start of his czarship. Nicholas’s inexperience explained his ineffectiveness as a ruler. In addition, Czar Nicholas’s absolutist beliefs blinded him from change. Nicholas II’s belief that he had absolute power and stubbornness clouded his view of change. According to Encyclopedia.com’s “Nicholas II,” “[Nicholas] was too stubborn and very slow to recognize the need for change. Nicholas found it…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In July 1918, the royal Romanov line was suddenly and brutally ended by the Bolsheviks. The Romanov family had ruled the Russian Empire for over three centuries. The Romanovs reign was one of strict tyranny. Tsar Nicholas II of Russia made one big step toward a more equal Russia by freeing the serfs but because the serfs owned no land they had little to no money still. After WWI when nicholas led Russia to a crushing defeat there was lots of unrest throughout Russia. I think that the main reason the Tsar was forced to abdicate the throne and then was slaughtered is that he made a more equal Russia but in doing so he made the serfs more impoverished than ever, that he had led Russia into multiple wars that had ended badly and that the technology…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II was a very poor leader for the people of Russia, he lacked leadership skills. His poor leadership qualities lead too many problems within Russia that were not dealt with efficiently. For example he did not trust the Duma, in 1906 the first Duma was introduced; after 72 days Nicholas dissolved the Duma as he did not believe in their policies and he did not trust them. This angered many people, Nicholas was not giving anyone a chance to speak and help him to change Russia.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1894 Russia’s last tsar, Nicholas II, inherited the throne when he was unprepared to do so. It is hard to do something when you are not ready. It is like letting a bull out of the chute when you were not ready, so you fall, but in Nicholas’s case a lot of things came down with him.…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The change in russia began something anew in the great country. The country began to get muses from the new religion facing them. Their leader begaN to follow something most new not of so the people of Russia had to manifest their thoughts and feelings in some way.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Undeniably, Nicholas II had an enormous role in bringing about the downfall of the Romanov Dynasty in March 1917. Whilst many historians argue the fall of the Tsarist regime to be the direct response and product of World War I, it is quite evident that it was Nicholas’ inefficient and fatal autocratic ruling which led to the March Revolution of 1917. The effects of Russia’s involvement in numerous wars only heightened and highlighted Nicholas’ unsuitability for the role of Tsar, and his absolute and stubborn belief in autocracy. Had Nicholas’ various choices throughout his reign differed, the Romanov Dynasty could in fact, have existed…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russia's army performed poorly. And this things led him to his abdication. He did not have leadership and the form of government that he believes no longer fit the time so his decisions led to the murder of his family and the end of over three hundred years of Romanov rule. His father, Alexander, was a strong influence on Nicholas II, mainly with religious values (He believed in the orthodox church) and his belief in autocratic government (a form of government that is run by a single, self-appointed leader, called an autocrat, as opposed to a group of leaders or elected officials).…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Tsarist Autocracy

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Tsarist autocracy has succeeded for more than three hundred years, but the Russian Revolution that occurred on November 1917 ended the long term autocracy. During this time period, Tsar Nicholas II was the leader of Russia and indeed the last one. He caused Russia’s downfall and made many Russians frustrated about the government. The Tsar did not acknowledge the nation's problems and failed to improve the lives of the citizens. As the Russians struggled with limited rights and lack of help from Nicholas II, they had to make a move. Although peasant unrest led to the Russians protesting and rebelling against the country, the Russian Revolution occurred because of Tsar Nicholas II’s weak leadership, in which he failed to accomplished the Russian’s goals, horribly managed the military, and thought that the system should not change.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thousands more uprisings took place, but were all repressed by Nicholas II’s troops. This caused Nicholas II to create and elected legislature called Duma, however he still continued to resist government reform (Biography.com Editors Para. 13-14). This caused increase tensions in Russia. The Romanov’s also put many unsatisfactory policies into effect.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1905 was a bad year for Nicholas’ popularity. In August of 1905, they where defeated in their war with Japan. With this resounding loss, the people of Russia saw the navy’s weakness as an overall representation of Russian weakness. They pushed harder in their search for reform.…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people do not realize what affects the Romanov family had on Russia, and what an important role they played for its future. The romanov family is an intriguing topic for many different reasons such as when Nikolay Alexandrovich Romanov ( Nicholas II) was a child, to the time he started his family, his ruling as Tsar, and the day his family was massacred. Nicholas II and his father, Alexander Alexandrovich Romanov (Alexander III), had differences, but agreed only on one subject; Nikolay Alexandrovich Romanov was not fit to rule Russia. Alexander III was “brutish despot” who ruled the people of Russia with Aristocracy. Alexander III saw his son as not worthy of the throne (Atchison).…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexei, who puzzled the people - they didn’t know about his condition - and was seen as spoiled and unloveable by politicians, was reasonably killed. He followed his father’s way of life, one that the people of Russia greatly disliked. It also made sense that Alexandra, the tsarina, was killed, as the people mistrusted her and Rasputin. Wherever Alexandra went, Rasputin went too. On the other hand, Nicholas’s brother, Grand Duke Michael, was asked to take the throne. (He later on refused) Eventually though, as history tells, most of the Romanov family was led to their deaths. OTMA, on the other hand, were possibly murdered due to the fact that their parentage led people to believe the children would turn out like Nicholas II and Alexandra. Nicholas was actually an uneducated man. “He had few intellectual pretensions” and instead preferred to leave the politics and papers to others. His parents did not bother educating him well either; Nicholas was tutored by average and undesirable people. The upbringing of the tsar helped Nicholas rule the way he did, and look at other people the way he did. The tsar was not very smart, so he sent away all ministers that he thought were more intelligent than him due to superiority belief. The people might have thought that OTMA and Alexei would turn out the same way - as Alexei showed he…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Last of the Romanovs

    • 3074 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The fall of the Romanov Empire changed the face of Russia forever. The royal family, led by Nicholas II, we're imprisoned and eventually assassinated by the Bolsheviks, a political party founded by Vladimir Lenin and Alexander Bogdanov whose main focus was to eliminate the monarchy and employ their own form of democracy. Tsar Nicholas II, his wife, Alexandra, and their only son, Alexei, heir apparent to the throne, were all integral figures in this historical evolution of Russia and its people.…

    • 3074 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    He accepted bribes, requests and sexual favours. He had the power to give or deny people audiences with the Tsar.3 This deepened the rift between the Tsar and one of his central pillars of support – the court. As nobility waited for hours for 5 minutes with the Tsar, the disgusting peasant would saunter past and spend hours with the Tsar. Now it was the silence on why Rasputin was in the royal quarters that led to people assuming they could be discussing anything from battle strategy, to government and politics. In reality they often had simple conversations about life; he acted in more as a confidante.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In November 1905, Milica presented Rasputin to Tsar Nicholas and his wife Alexandra – ultimately changing the course of Rasputin’s life and the political direction of…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays