Preview

NIKE CASE STUDY QUESTIONS

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1030 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
NIKE CASE STUDY QUESTIONS
NIKE CASE STUDY

1. Why is it important to estimate a firm’s cost of capital? What does it represent? Is the WACC set by investors or by managers?
Weighted average cost of capital or WACC represents the overall cost of capital in the company. It takes into considerations cost of debt and cost of equity. As company’s value can grow by increasing its assets that could be financed either be debt or equity and cost of capital shows how much it costs to do that. Cost of capital is a very important component in financial management decision-making as it shows the rate of return investors require when they invest in the company. Cost of capital is widely used in capital budgeting as projects with IRR lower than WACC should be abandoned otherwise company will destroy its own value. Cost of capital helps evaluate the performance of key people in the company as stock price and value of the company grows if the right projects were undertaken. WACC helps decide on methods of financing as it puts pressure on top managers to reduce the cost of capital. Using cost of capital, investor can decide if company’s stock is undervalued, overvalued or priced correctly and make very important decisions as the result as to buy, sell or hold shares of a particular company. WACC is set by the investors or markets, but not by managers. As market is the place where supply means demand, investor requires particular return for a certain risk and that is why WACC can only be estimated. WACC calculations are very sensitive to the small changes in assumptions of its formula.
2. What is your estimate of Nike’s WACC? What mistakes to Joanna Cohen make in her analysis? Which method is best for calculating the cost of equity?
I think that Joanna Cohen makes several mistakes while calculating Nike’s WACC. First mistake is her calculation of debt which should be measured according to the market value, not the book value. Joanna calculated debt using the book values of current portion of long-term debt,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Although it appears that Nike has some inventory management problems, they are clearly growing their net income year over year. From the company perspective, they are effectively leveraging their assets to yield favorable increases in profit year over year, but from the stockholder’s perspective, they are effective leveraging their equity. This shows that although competition increases in the market, Nike’s brand remains relevant and desired within its primary markets. Nike can leverage their brand recognition, liquid capital, and their room for additional risk to focus on their e-commerce platforms, emerging markets, and women’s product…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nike Case

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Many issues should be addressed regarding Joanna Cohen’s WACC calculation. First, to calculate the debt cost of capital, Cohen divided the total interest expense by the company’s average debt balance. This is an issue because she did not take into account the current yield on publicly traded Nike debt. Another issue that should be addressed is the calculation of the equity cost of capital. Using CAPM, Cohen took a 20 year Treasury bond as her risk free, the average Beta for the last 6 years, and a geometric mean for market premium. Also, Cohen calculated the book value of equity and debt instead of using market values.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    case questions

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    4. What is your best estimate of the WACC for Kraft, Campbell, and Del Monte? How do these WACC influence your thinking about the WACC for Heinz?…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    First of all, cost of capital is an essential component in WACC. WACC is composed of cost of equity and cost of debt.The Mortensen’s estimates are used in various ways including asset appraisals for both capital budgeting and financial accounting, performance assessments, M&A proposals and stock repurchases at division ,business unit level and corporate level.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    UA has significantly less debt than Nike as evidenced by UA's 35.5% debt-to-asset ratio as compared to Nike's 41.8% debt-to-asset ratio. Even though there is a big difference in this number, Nike can cover its interest expense 111.5 times with income before interest and taxes, while UA can only cover its interest expense 66.3 times with their income before interest and taxes. So even though UA has less debt, Nike has the advantage when it comes to paying those debts.…

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Answer: The weighted average cost of capital (WACC) approach to capital budgeting involves forecasting the all-equity free cash flows of the firm and then finding the value of the levered firm by discounting the all-equity free cash flows at an appropriate WACC. It is a…

    • 3595 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The cost of capital is a term used in the field of financial investment to refer to the cost of a company’s funds, both debt and equity, or from an investors’ point of view, the shareholders required return on a portfolio of a company’s existing securities. It is used to evaluate new projects of a company as it is the minimum return that investors expect for providing capital to the company, thus setting a benchmark that a new project has to meet (Wikipedia, 2004). In other words, it is the expected return that is required on investments to compensate for the required risk. It represents the discount rate that should be used for capital budgeting calculations. The cost of capital is generally calculated on a weighted average, also called Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC).…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    We found Joanna’s estimates to be wrong because of a few reasons. The first mistake she made was using the average beta instead of the most recent beta provided. She was using average of Nike’s beta from 1996 to the present, which was .80 (Case 13, pg. 59). We used the beta of .69, which was the most recent beta provided to us. The second mistake we found was that she used the book value of debt instead of the market value of debt. The book value was $441.30 and the market value was $421.88 so she overstated debt by $19.42 (Exhibit 6).…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Critical Analysis on NIKE

    • 2231 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In the late 1970s Blue Ribbon Sports officially became Nike and increased its sales from $10,000,000 to $270,000,000. During the 1980s and 1990s the company and sales continued to grow. In 1996, Nike was named Marketer of the Year with sales at $6.74 billion. Sales and profits have continued to grow over the years, but at what cost to those who work in Nike’s factories worldwide?…

    • 2231 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Petkova, P., & Pattabiraman, S. (2010, May 19). Nike Strategy Analysis- Final Jun 2010. Retrieved October 10, 2012, from Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/doc/38643840/Nike-Strategy-Analysis-Final-Jun-2010…

    • 3628 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Krispy Kreme

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Nike, Inc. case helps demonstrate the importance to WACC and how it helps decided which type of investments should and should not be taken. In this paper a couple of key problem are going to be answered. These problems occur with the figures that Kimi Ford’s assistant, Joanna Cohen, calculated and gave her in order for Ford to make her decision on rather or not she should invest in Nike, Inc. stock.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Question 1: What are the pros. Cons and risk associated with Nike`s core marketing strategy?…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    NikeCostOfCapital

    • 303 Words
    • 1 Page

    of Nike’s cost of capital, based on ‘Best Practices’. Make sure you clearly explain all…

    • 303 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nike Case Study

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Koch, C. (2004, June 15). Nike Rebounds: How (and why) Nike recovered from its supply…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nike, Inc. has had three years of shifts of revenue and profit increases. During the case years studied (1999-2001), the net income in 2001 for Nike, Inc. (589.7M) increased by only 1.8% over 2000. Increases from 1999-2000 were much more significant 28.3% (579.1M). For the year 2001, revenues at Nike increased by 5.5% over 2000 to 9.489B. Since 1997, the company’s success include maintaining the number two position in soccer (world’s number one sport), becoming a major player in the golf market, increasing its market value share in Europe, and becoming known as an apparel company. Nike announced a new goal in 2000-2003 to increase the women’s apparel business from 22% of the company’s sales to 30 percent.…

    • 3370 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays