Preview

Nikita Khrushchev's Secret Speech: The Perceived Thawing of the Cult of Personality

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1495 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nikita Khrushchev's Secret Speech: The Perceived Thawing of the Cult of Personality
Soviet Union

The Perceived Thawing of the Cult of Personality Nikita Khrushchev attacked Joseph Stalin at the Twentieth Congress of the CPSU in his secret speech. His goals behind the presentation of the speech were self-serving in nature. Khrushchev wanted to consolidate power while at the same time distance himself from Stalin. His lack of political forethought created a specific set of problems for the Communist Party and the Soviet Union. Khrushchev’s program of de-Stalinization had a negative impact on Soviet political relations both at the domestic and international levels. A domestic political power struggle immediately ensued following the death of Stalin on March 5, 1953. Nikita Khrushchev was engaged in the battle for dictatorial control of the Soviet Union against Vyacheslov Molotov and Georgy Malenkov. Both Molotov and Malenkov were proud advocates of Stalinism and their affiliation with the former dictator. Khrushchev decided to make a political maneuver that would forever change the course of the Soviet Union. “Stalin’s successors could not rule by terror and had to win support of party officials, the military, the secret police, and other state bureaucracies.” Khrushchev understood this political climate and decided to act upon it. He decided to distance himself from Stalin and his reign of terror by vilifying him. This in turn would greatly reduce the political appeal of Molotov and Malenkov. Khrushchev decided to demonize Stalin and his former lackeys in the form of a presentation of statistics and inflammatory anti-Stalinist rhetoric at the Twentieth Congress of the Communist Party. In the speech he first condemned Stalin for securing too much power for himself. “It is impermissible and foreign to the spirit of Marxism-Leninism to elevate one person, to transform him into a superman possessing supernatural characteristics…Such a man…is infallible in his behavior.” According to Khrushchev, Stalin had accumulated so much power that he was

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    good for nothing. Stalin ordered someone to kill Trotsky. “The NKVD(his guards/soldiers) folders assassinated Stalin's rival Leo Trotsky”(grade saver) which would be Snowball but the only difference was in the book snowball didn’t get assassinated he just got run out of the farm you the dogs which would be the NKVD.Snowball would have been the guy who really was trying to look out for the working class. Like Napoleon, Stalin kept tight control over the media. He commissioned paintings of himself surrounded by adoring children. He essentially re-wrote Russian history, inserting himself into the Russian Revolution of 1917 and later suggesting that he was solely and personally responsible for winning World War II. And, at the same time he was making himself into Russia's #1 Savior, he wanted to make sure that he was remembered for his modesty.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The personality of those involved in the power struggle should however not be disregarded as they played a role in Stalin’s ensuing victory. Stalin was known to some members of his party as the grey blur as supposedly there was nothing remarkable about him. His role in the October revolution and the Russian civil war was minimal however his true aptitude lay in administrative positions, his skill in the clerical field was so great that Lenin came to rely on Stalin’s administrative capability and loyalty. Even so when Lenin became ill Stalin began to oppose him. Lenin’s testament was highly critical of Stalin and encouraged that he be removed, however as the testament was never made public this was never carried out. The fact that Stalin was not seen as threat and was underestimated by his peers meant that he was able to gain authority without raising the suspicions of other party members.…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Soviet Union DBQ

    • 840 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1924, the Soviet Union faced a power struggle when it’s leader and creator Vladimir Lenin died. His successor however, came into power and immediately began to make changes. This man knew exactly what he wanted to keep and more importantly what he wanted to change. His birth name was Iosif Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili, but who could possibly rule and leave a legacy with that name? He then adopted the name Joseph Stalin, (which means man of steel.) and began to rule the Soviet Union. At this time, the Soviet Union was well behind all the other countries; Stalin made many changes to the soviet society, employing many methods to achieve his aims.…

    • 840 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    6) Khrushchev’s view of U.S. actions are that moves made by the United States such as the “anti-communism” movement was used to cover up statements of one power for world domination. The U.S. wanted to have a secure, dominant world power in the capitalist world. In document sic Khrushchev…

    • 1198 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    speech at the 20th congress of the soviet party. This political message of denouncing Stalinism seemed to…

    • 1073 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1922, when Vladimir Lenin died, someone needed to step up and the Soviet Union. As he was slowly dying, a power struggle emerged between Leon Trotsky, and Joseph Stalin. Even though Trotsky “had been widely viewed as the heir of Lenin, it was relatively easy for Stalin to combine with the other Bolshevik leaders in order to head off this threat” (Paley 10). In Lenin’s “Final Testament”, Lenin could already see that Stalin was quickly and surreptitiously gaining power. Stalin’s position of General Secretary gave him the ability to appoint people to important positions. Lenin was also reluctant to see Stalin as his successor because he thought that Trotsky could do a much better job. Lenin believed that Trotsky was the best man in the central…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Talk about how after Stalin’s death he set about on de-Stalinisation and reform the Stalinist system that had previously consisted of terror and repression…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1956, Khrushchev delivered a report to the Twentieth Party of Congress in which he stated, "The Leninist principle of peaceful coexistence of states with different social systems has always been and remains the general line of our country's foreign policy. "1 Khrushchev appeared…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Who Is Nikita Khrushchev?

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Nikita Khrushchev was born on April 15, 1894 in the small Russian town of Kalinovka. As a young man he worked as a metalworker, before he joined the Bolsheviks in 1998. He moved up the party ranks rather quickly and became one of Stalin's trusted advisors. In 1938, Khrushchev was sent to govern Ukraine and he served as a commissar during World War II. After Stalin's death in 1953, there was a struggle for power and in 1956 Khrushchev's "Secret Speech" was published. In the speech Khrushchev stated that he did not agree with the Great Purge even though he had helped Stalin with the purge.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Khrushchev’s vilification of Stalin in his address to the Twentieth Party Congress was meticulous in detailing precise failures of his predecessor’s rule. Above all, Khrushchev strongly elaborated on Stalin’s extremities, especially the cult of personality that he had built up over the years. The speech also in turn attacked ‘Stalinist repressions, arrests, terror and murders…[and] for bungling foreign affairs and mishandling the war’. Despite this, Khrushchev was cautious in limiting his other criticisms of Stalin, and it was this focus on him as an individual rather than of the overall Soviet system that defined the boundaries of acceptable criticism. As such, the speech sought to condemn Stalin without endangering the party’s validity or the system that had indeed allowed Khrushchev to rise to power.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    the successor to the late Joseph Stalin, stood at the helm of the Kremlin for a majority of the Cold War, from 1953-1964. Khrushchev spent a great part of his time in power solidifying foreign relations and working toward the domestic unification of the Soviet Union, which Stalin had shredded. During his time devoted to the outer parts of the Soviet Union, Khrushchev dealt with many people wanting a life with the western virtues which were infringing upon other parts of the USSR. To counter this issue, Khrushchev built the Berlin Wall and dropped the Iron Curtain to box out the West. One significant enemy that Khrushchev felt threatened Soviet dominance was the United States.…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through the show trials and ‘The Terror’, Stalin shaped the Communist Party and Soviet society to a significant extent from 1934 to 1941 through the use of fear and control to assume total power with no opposition. The Great Terror aimed to target individuals who undermined Stalin’s regime, and was catalysed by the assassination of Sergei Kirov, a Bolshevik revolutionary working below Stalin who would often challenge him. Through the use of political purges, Stalin shaped the Communist party to a significant extent, eliminating and denouncing any possible rivals while also creating fear within his government. Similarly, through the show trials and the purges, Stalin significantly restructured society, creating a need for obedience through the use of terror within soviet society. However, Stalin…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nikita Khrushchev, though not the most likely successor to Stalin, became the leader of the USSR in 1953 and was toppled from power in 1964 after a Coup in which his policies were attacked by his colleagues. They accused him of being contradictory towards Lenin’s teachings, especially in his agricultural and industrial policies, in being an unfitted leader and erratic in his approach, as well as being reckless over the Cuban Missiles Crisis and West Berlin and ignoring advice. The cause of Khrushchev’s downfall is a contentious issue among historians. Some historians such as Martin Page argue that it was as unhappiness among party hardliners with his reforms that led to him losing power. Upon…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After Vladimir Lenin’s death in 1924, Stalin had to win the vote of the people, despite a number of obstacles in his way. First, he had to get support from Lenin’s followers. To do so, he presented himself as a chief mourner at the funeral, and permitted the embalming of the body. In a letter to be read after his death, Lenin suggested that Stalin should be replaced as general secretary, and it was only that the Central Committee decided to keep the letter a secret that Stalin maintained his grip on power. In 1925, conflict arose between Trotsky, who believed in utilising the concept of ‘permanent revolution’ to gain power, and Stalin, who believed that the priority should be to build up the strength of the USSR.…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are several reasons why Stalin’s opponents were unable to prevent him form becoming the leader of the USSR by 1929; the personality’s of the opponents being a hinting factor for themselves, Stalin’s cunning and sly ways to get what he wanted in the party, and Lenin’s testament not being publicly read out.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays