A product with a faulty design exposes its users to unnecessary risks, and products must be designed with all foreseeable uses in mind. Cars must be designed in view of the probability of accidents.…
In the scenario Jerry McCall is Dr. Williams office assistant. Jerry has received training for a medical assistant and licensed practical Nurse. Although Jerry is handling the incoming calls while the receptionist is at lunch a patient of Dr. Williams had called in the office and stated that he needed two refill an antidepressant and Valium right away because he is leaving the airport within 30 minutes. The patient states that Dr. Williams always gives him a small supply of Valium when he goes to fly. Does Jerry have the correct medical training to refill this type of prescription? If it were another type of medication, such as high blood pressure to be ordered to take on daily basis would this make a difference for Jerry to call in the refill? I f Jerry calls in the prescription and the patient has a reaction while flying is Jerry protected from a lawsuit under the doctrine of respondeat superior?…
General Motors (GM) is one of the oldest and largest car manufactures in the United States. As early as 2001, the company began to notice issues with an ignition switch that was to be used in many car models. The problem with this switch was that a driver could “inadvertently knock them to ‘off’ or ‘accessory’ mode while driving” (Plumer, 2014). If this happened, “the engine would shut off and cars would lose their power steering and power brakes” as well as the airbags “wouldn’t inflate in the event of a crash” (Plumer, 2014). Allowing this problem to not be fixed led to many crashes and fatalities across the United States. After several years this eventually led to the recall of millions of cars and thousands of lawsuits for GM. This is an ethical issue because GM was knowledgeable of the problem and made a decision to ignore it which led to the deaths and injuries of many innocent people. In order to evaluate this ethical situation we will…
Dr. Williams assistant Jerry does have the training but does not have the ability to make a call for a patient because if he prescribed the wrong dosage amount then there will be in trouble with the patient and also with HIPAA. It will not be in the best interest of Jerry to make this call for Dr. Williams without making a call to Dr. Williams first. In order for this to happen without breaking any laws, Jerry needs to have communication with Dr. Williams. To keep the integrity of office Jerry should ensure that the proper medication and make sure that it is the patient’s correct prescription if Dr. Williams gives the okay for jerry to provide the Valium for the patient. This might have to be a medication that this patient have to go without on his trip.…
Jerry’s medical training does not qualify him to issue the refill order. The patient’s physician is the one who needs to determine whether or not the patient should have a prescription of Valium issued for his flight or not. Jerry’s medical training does not qualify him to issue any prescription to any patient regardless of what it is and who it is for. If a patient’s prescription request was for control of high blood pressure that the patient critically needed on a daily basis Jerry would still not have the professional credentials to allow him to issue the prescription orders. If faced with such a scenario Jerry should explain to the patient that he does not have the right to issue a prescription of any kind but that he would make it his first priority to tell the receptionist when he or she returned from his or her lunch break.…
Stanwick, P. A., and Stanwick, S. D. (2009). Understanding Business Ethics (Vols. 1 - 1, pp. 8-12). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.…
If the case is evaluated on the basis of long term consequences, the information about the issue regarding the safety was going to come out sooner or later. That is directly going to affect company’s reputation throughout the world as a car manufacturer. I believe that even for designing an economic car the safety standards should be carefully…
Theoretically, the utilitarian theory of ethics states that action should be viewed as good or bad based on the number of people deriving pleasure from it. Provided it is the majority of the people deriving pleasure then the act is good. Therefore, the board should have educated the players on the wrongful aspect of the sale of the memorabilia based on this theory (Kelly, 2012).…
Everyday health care workers around the world are faced with tough decisions. The law guides many decisions but some decisions require ethical considerations. Making good ethical decisions is not always as easy as it seems. Making ethical decisions is even harder when the primary intention is to be helpful, but it is beyond an employee’s qualifications.…
Toyota used to sit on top of the world. It basked in the reputation of building high-quality cars efficiently. It enjoyed unprecedented growth, even surpassing General Motors as the largest car manufacturer in the world. But all of that came tumbling down with reports that cars were accelerating out of control, careening down highways, and putting everyone’s lives in danger. There was even a recording of a 911 call from an off-duty policeman who lost control of his car and died in the ensuing crash. Toyota responded with a recall of historic proportions—nearly 8 million cars in the United States and 1.8 million in Europe. It even suspended sales of brand new models, including the best-selling Camry and Corolla, until the vehicles could be repaired. But still, there was confusion about what was causing the problems—was it the floor mats, the braking system, the software controlling the engine, or something else? Conspiracy theorists argued that Toyota had no clue what was causing the sudden acceleration and that their recall was basically worthless.…
1. Here, the ethical dilemma is if it is right choice to save the lives of others that stuck on the pediatric wing of the hospital, at the danger of losing those human life rescuers themselves.…
Car companies are great examples of proactive stances to social responsibility. Companies such as Toyota, Suzuki, and Chevrolet follow the law but also set out warnings to help their business. Instead of falling behind and losing business, these companies put our letters for incidences as soon as they happen. They call these letters “recalls.” Recalls are sent to consumers warning them that an accident has occurred in the same vehicle they own and let the people know they…
Studies have shown that above all the other industries, the Auto industry has a huge role to play in the pollution of the atmosphere. These industries release various gasses and fuels in the air on a daily basis and this is indeed very detrimental to the environment and…
As a respected company with a good reputation, Ford should consider public safety as its main priority when designing a product. It is unethical to allow people to die or be injured because of the cost incurred in order to prevent that. Ford should have taken precautious measures in advance in order to prevent harm. But they have already forecasted and assumed future liability from a defective product. They have adopted a policy of allowing a certain number of people to die or be injured even though it could be prevented. There is an ongoing debate whether it is possible to put a price on a life, to use it in the calculations that lead to a positive economic outcome. Since Ford is evidently a profit oriented company and their social responsibilities are low, it is evident that they consider profit as its main priority when making decisions in regard to their design.…
Within both Renault and Nissan, there were significant issues facing the firms. Renault, a one time ‘losers league’ member, was able to turn itself into a $1.65 billion company. A distinctively French and European car maker, Renault had never run a global operation. At one point, the company sold no cars in the United States and only 2,476 units in Japan, the world’s two largest automotive markets. Nissan, on the other hand, was basically bankrupt prior to the joint venture with Renault. Nissan was losing money and market share continuously and car production had dropped by 600,000 units. The Nissan factories were running at 53% capacity utilization. The company had over $20 billion in debt, which was more comparable to that of a medium-sized developing country than of a large automaker. The marriage of the two companies, including efficiencies, competencies and resources, initially could have been predicted to be an automatic failure. There were cultural differences that the two were forced to work through and were able to do so, despite the challenges.…