Aromatic Substitution. The benzene ring itself is electron-rich, which makes Nucleophile Aromatic Substitution difficult, unless there are a number of strongly electron-withdrawing substituents on the ring. EAS, on the other hand, is a very useful method for putting many different substituents on a benzene ring, even if there are other substituents already present. In this experiment you will put a nitro (—NO2) group on a benzene ring, which already has an OCH3 group, attached to the methyl benzoate. Reaction:
Procedure: reference to: Lab manual Exp 43 “Nitration of Methyl Benzoate” page 338-341 Results: * Weight of methyl benzoate: 3.065g * Weight of methyl m-nitrobenzoate: 3.3443g Percentage yield of methyl m-nitrobenzoate: 112.3% * Calculation: %yield= (weight of methyl m-nitrobenzoate)/ (weight of methyl benzoate) X 100% = (3.443g) / (3.065g)X100% = 112.3% * Melting point range of product: 1st time: 62oC- 72 oC 2nd time: 68oC- 72 oC * Theoretically melting point of methyl m-nitrobenzoate: 78 oC Analysis: From the results we could see, the weight of starting material we used is 3.065g, but the weight of the final product we collected was 3.3443g, which is greater than the starting material. It is impossible to get the percentage of yield higher than 100% except the products did not dry enough. Also, the melting point we measured for the final product was 62oC- 72 oC for the first time and 68oC- 72 oC for the second time, but theoretically, the melting point of methyl m-nitrobenzoate is should around 78 oC. This error may also cause by the product did not be dried enough which means water still mixed with the product, which could result the un-accurate measurable melting point we got.
Conclusion:
In this experiment, we learned about the electrophilic aromatic substitution reaction. The methyl nitrobenzoate was prepared from methyl benzoate, concentrated HNO3, and concentrated H2SO4 via an electrophilic aromatic substitution reaction. The HNO3 and H2SO4 were combined to form a nitrating solution, which was mixed with a mixture of methyl benzoate and H2SO4. As a result, methyl m-nitrobenzoate is the principal product formed, but it is not mean there is no dinitrobenzoate product formed. Dinitrobenzoate is much less favorable than the formation of the mononitration product.