Preview

No Child Left Behind

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
5087 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
No Child Left Behind
President Bush called No Child Left Behind "the cornerstone of my administration," back in 2001. Even Senator Kerry voted for it. It gave unprecedented control to the federal government, which is a major deal since it comes from a Republican, a group who normally advocates state control over education issues. Now, four years later, the law has shown some major problems in the implementation of its goal and fundamental problems with the law itself. During the election you would have expected something this important would have received more focus during debates about domestic issues. However, because of the fact the two candidates did not want to show some courage and make any major changes to No Child Left Behind during the election, it became somewhat of a moot point. No Child Left Behind is broken and all of the politicians are afraid to fix it.

The purpose of No Child Left Behind is to close the achievement gap and to make sure that all children learn their math and reading by 2014. The law tries to accomplish this hefty goal by implementing different tactics. One of them is to have stronger accountability in the schools. In order to achieve this goal they use standardized tests to see how well the schools are teaching all of the students, with specific emphasis on students who are disadvantaged, like poor students or minority students. They divide the students into subgroups according their ethnic backgrounds and wealth and give them the tests. The tests are supposed to show how well the students are doing learning their basic skills such as math and reading. In theory, the school can then identify those students who are falling behind and focus more attention and resources on them. The schools then test the students again in order to determine if there was any improvement in their basic skills. If there is no improvement in two years the school system must provide other alternatives for the children. For example, the school system must pay for the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The No Child Left Behind act has its pros and cons when it comes to the five core principles including strong accountability, expanded flexibility and control, methods based on scientific research, expanded options for parents, and highly qualified teachers. The pros and cons of the say this because when teaching diverse learners they are dealing with a variety of different learning styles. In turn every student will not respond to the No Child Left Behind principles or methods in the same manner, meaning that it may work for some while it may not work for others. The idea of strong accountability it is relevant to the teachers and the students. The teachers they are held accountable due to the set standards and curriculums that they have to teach and follow in order to meet the goals of the NCLB. Along with this they have to prepare the student for the standardized tests that are put in place to measure the students and the teacher’s progress. This is tricky because if the student fails teachers are held accountable while the students are also held responsible for themselves if they fail. This is when highly qualified teachers cone into effect due to the evaluations of their teaching through how the students perform on the standardized tests. In some ways this may be a good thing, but it can also be really bad too. If the students do good then the teachers look highly qualified but if the students don’t do a good job then the teachers look unqualified or as if they are not meeting the standards when that really may not be the case at all. Although teachers have certain curriculums to follow, they do have expanded flexibility and control regarding tailoring their lesson plans which is a good thing that gives them a little freedom. On the other hand it has its cons too because that in my opinion is about the only leeway that they have to make things their own. This will affect the students because teachers are stuck…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When reading the 2007 article by education expert Linda Darling- Hammond called “Evaluating ‘No Child Left Behind’”, Darling- Hammond goes into depth and criticizes just how much the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) accomplished in five years. The author begins by using a neutral and agreeable tone with how the law was supposed to be “a victory for American children”. She also genuinely acknowledges that the notoriously known NCLB Act initially brought high hopes for us Americans to have a sophisticated and reformed education system for our children. But almost just as fast as she agrees that the law was intended for good, she gets right to her point that she opposes the law by using much of logos and connects pathos and ethos along the lines.…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After the No Child Left Behind act was passed, schools were given a set of standards that were required to be followed when hiring a teacher in order to find the best possible educators for the schools. Now, having more qualified teachers for schools sounds like it would have an immensely positive effect on the education system however, the NCLB act set these standards extremely high which made it very difficult for schools to find teachers who met those requirements.…

    • 534 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq No Child Left Behind

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The policy was created by a group of people known as official actors. Official actors are according to Birkland (2016), are participants in the policy making process whose involvement is motivated or mandated by his/her official position in government, these people can include the President, people in Congress, the Courts, and etc. This definition seems to say that an official actor is the ones that hold some sort of position in government, and has the power to create policy. This then begs the question, who were the official actors who were behind the No Child Left Behind policy? The official actors behind the policy was President George W. Bush, who was the one who came up with the policy in the first place, and was co-sponsored by House Speaker John Boehner, George Miller and Senators Ted Kennedy, and Judd Gregg. (Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/nclb/overview/intro/guide/guide_pg12.html). From this we can see that the policy had bipartisanship wish is rare for the government. Usually, both parties tend to argue about how to create a policy, and would try to have the policy lean more in their favor over the other party. When this policy was being created, it seems like both parties knew of the severity of the country’s failing school system and decided to come together and form a policy that would be beneficial to all. When the bill came to a…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nclb Thesis

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The United States educational system is preforming poorly compared to the rest of the world: America is ranked 17th in educational performance, 25th in Math, 17th in Science, and 14th in Reading skills. Disabled, minority, and underprivileged children are lacking the adequate resources to succeed in our school system. No Child Left Behind (NCLB) was a revised version of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (EASA) proposed by former President George Bush in 2001. The intent was to reform the educational system so American’s schools could have the opportunity to thrive domestically and internationally, grant children equality of opportunity, and boost students K-12 level of understanding in core subjects, such as science, technology, and math. This initiative sought to improve our lagging educational system in the U.S to inch closer to higher achieving educational standards, such as the United Kingdom. However, No Child Left Act is hindering children’s chance of a “healthy start, a head start, a fair start, a safe start, and a moral start in life,” by amplifying undesired pressure on students through standardized testing, increasing federal jurisdiction within schools, and minimizing the roles of additional core subjects, such as social studies and foreign languages. This…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2002, President Bush signed into law No Child Left Behind Act, to ensure that every state is testing every child. (http://www.whithouse.gov/infocus/education/2007) Students from culturally, and linguistically backgrounds, expanding access to tutoring, help parents to get information in time for their children. Our children must be equipped with the knowledge and skills to compete in the global economy. (Judy,R.,Reading in content areas.pg.71,2006)…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No Child-Left Behind Act

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (often referred to as No Child Left Behind) was a landmark in education reform designed to improve student achievement and change the culture of America's schools. President George W. Bush described this law as the "cornerstone of my administration" (Department of Education). It allows low-income families, whose children traditionally have less academic opportunities, to move to private school or specialized charter schools via a school voucher. The act was expected to introduce high standards for education, the belief that all children, regardless of class, should have equal opportunities to learn, and accountability for failing school systems. However, the act…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This act was supported by the Obama administration and is currently in place in the United States. This act created today’s usage of standardized testing with the thought of sticking to the title, leaving no child behind. In Michael’s article he quotes Valerie Strauss from the Washington Post, saying in relation to the act, “has triggered ‘an expanding revolt against high-stakes standardized tests and the use of students' scores to evaluate teachers, schools, districts and states.’” These options presented by the government is hurting the value of…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    For the no child left behind executive branch they always put reading first for the children. President Bush stated that there could be no child left behind. He wanted every child to be able to read by the third grade. He made the reading increase in the programs. Most of the kids that went to the public school were getting left behind. No child left behind was very popular the parents attended the programs that they had low income student. There were a lot of major program changes every school was a drug free school and people tried to stop the little violence that was there at the schools. The legislative branch for no child left behind was in the United States. It attended at the elementary schools and the high schools. Every educational school had…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    High School and Act

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Lets first start by explaining what the Act entails. As defined by Wikipedia, The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (Public Law 107-110), more commonly known as NCLB, is a United States federal law signed on January 8, 2002 by George Bush, that reauthorizes a number of federal programs that aim to improve the performance of primary and secondary schools by increasing the standards of accountability for state, school districts and schools, as well as providing parents more flexibility in choosing which schools their children will attend. NCLB is built on four principles: accountability for results, more choices for parents, greater local control and flexibility, and an emphasis on doing what works based on scientific research. Additionally, it promotes an increased focus on reading and re-authorizes the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA). NCLB is the latest federal legislation which enact the theories of standards-based education reform, which is based on the belief that high expectations and setting of goals will result in success for all students. Under the new law, every racial and demographic group in each school must meet rising goals on English and math tests to make "adequate yearly progress." This Act tests reading and math skills of…

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The first reason that the schools are failing is because the bar that the NCLB sets has been set too high, and that the NCLB is failing. The NCLB itself is failing. The No Child Left behind Act, which was implemented by President Bush, is failing. Many educators would agree that the goals that the act sets, “every student in the country is supposed to be performing at grade level in math and reading by 2014”(Mandell 1), are impossible and that the standards are not fair, not accurate, and unrealistic. According to a survey, 48% of schools in the nation are not making “adequate yearly progress” (Mandell 1). This means that the No Child Left Behind Act is failing in 48 percent of the United States, so the act is clearly not effective and needs to be revised so that it has more obtainable goals. Furthermore, the standards were doubled by the NCLB. States are required to have reading and math tests once a year for 3rd to 8th graders and in 10th, 11th, or 12th grade students must take the test once, according to the NCLB. This new rule changes the number of tests from 3 to 7 (Popham 15-16). This rule is unfair because it more than doubles the standard that was previously in affect; this should have been a slow tradition and not have been all at once. Finally, even college professors know that the NCLB is failing. According to Arne…

    • 2043 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    No Child Left Behind Act

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The No Child Left Behind Act, a federal social program that tries to encourages after school programs should be eliminated and the extra funds given to schools to decide where it goes.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No Child Left Behind Act

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The No Child Left Behind Law was passed by Congress in 2001in an attempt to increase the federal role in education and mandate requirements that will affect every public school in America, including Texas. The goal of the NCLB act was to create procedures intended to shut achievement gaps between different groups of students. States are mandated to increase student testing, gather and publicize subgroup results, guarantee a highly qualified teacher in every classroom, and guarantee that all students, despite of socioeconomic factors, attain a capable level of education and that no child will be left behind. It basically requires states to make more extensive changes and meet exceptionally positive deadlines. Obeying the requirements of NCLB is going to be a challenge for many states and teachers if they want to continue receiving federal funding and not to be replaced with someone more highly trained.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No Child Left Behind Act

    • 1081 Words
    • 31 Pages

    The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act focuses on standardized testing in all American schools. It is the Bush administration's sweeping educational reform, aimed at improving the performance of the nation's public schools by introducing accountability. Supporters of the act claim that it will increase the performance of all school children by raising the standards and allowing parents greater freedom in choosing the school they want their child to attend. The act also puts in place a system of punishment for schools if their student body does not perform to the standards set down by the National government (NCLB act). As well as increasing standards, this act also encourages teachers to use a curriculum that the government developed with "scientifically based research" (a phrase that appears 111 times in the act) (Hammond 4). While standardized curriculum and increased standards seem like they would improve children's learning, in reality it hurts them by pushing them too hard academically instead of focusing on social development, and denying them specialized attention based upon their individual abilities. The debate surrounding this has become a significant topic since the Act is currently under review and could be in the process of reauthorization. At the time of its inception, both political parties (Republicans and Democrats) supported the NCLB Act, however, both parties are now arguing over its validity. In 2005, there have been slight \adjustments to the regulations first set in 2005 by the Department of Education, but the revisions were not enough to gain full support from both parties. This act has failed to garner support from most Americans, and like most Americans, I also agree that this should not be reinstituted. No Child Left Behind was designed by the Bush administration to reduce the "learning gap" between different groups of students and to ensure better teacher equality. However, it sets fourth a method of measuring…

    • 1081 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Public Policy Research

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 2001 when No Child Left Behind took effect it sparked the desire to use assessments to measures and to improve student learning. In the beginning these assessments focused on state tests, and found that results were not sufficient to identify students that were not keeping with up with fellow students. No Child Left Behind is a great theory, but in a realistic approach to the problem. We need give our government credit for taking bold steps to try to help our public schools, but need to realize the damages of No Child Left Behind are still being felt.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays