Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

No Country for Old Men: The Significance of Llewelyn Moss

Better Essays
1394 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
No Country for Old Men: The Significance of Llewelyn Moss
The Significance of Llewelyn Moss
McCarthy’s No Country for Old Men is a story about survival that focuses on themes of morals, morality, and luck. In many ways, this is a story about how people deal with death. Llewelyn Moss, one of the most significant characters in the novel, emphasizes the underlining theme which is that death comes for us all.
Characters in No Country for Old Men are western in the sense they use words sparingly. They are all: tough, modest, and patient, living by the saying ‘actions speak louder than words.’ Llewelyn Moss is no different, following his own version of an unspoken book of morals. Moss is smart, self-confident, competent, and passionate. In the beginning of the novel when Moss takes the two million dollar brief case home, he convinced himself to return to the scene of a crime to comfort an obvious criminal (McCarthy 23). Moss was disturbed by the thought of a wounded survivor begging for water. Retuning was a moral choice, motivated by compassion and obligations of pre-established values. The fact that Moss risked his own live to give that wounded survivor water reassures that he is a good person.
Moss is a very capable. When Moss stumbled upon a drug deal gone wrong, instead of calling the local authorities, he decided to investigate. This gives the impression that Moss is courageous and has little reason to be afraid. Moss is a Vietnam veteran who spends his leisure time hunting. He is a good at tracking and shooting a rifle. His past experience serving in the military shows that he works well under pressure. Moss has a relatively good chance at getting away with the money because of his experience and attributes. Besides Anton Chigurh, Moss is one of the few good characters who challenges death, continuously surviving in the face of danger.
Moss had one goal which was to get out with his wife and money. Unfortunately, Moss is forced to make morally questionable decisions along the way that include: refusing to involve law enforcement, placing his wife and other bystanders in danger, returning to the scene of a shootout, and having a desire to escape consequences. More notably, several people die because of one decision. The two men at the drug deal, the Mexicans at the motel, Carson Wells and Moss’s wife all die because Moss made the simple decision to take the brief case of money in the first place.
However, Moss is not a selfish person for taking the money. Moss, a welder, veteran and husband in his 30’s, saw an opportunity and took it. His motivation for taking the money has to do with his financial situation. Moss and his wife Carla Jean live a modest trailer lifestyle. Moss, for the most part, has good intentions. It just so happens while hunting antelope on the plains of West Texas, he discovered a drug deal gone horribly wrong and took advantage of the situation. His memories of Vietnam, trailer lifestyle, and profession as welder, bear witness to a washed-up life. This two million dollar brief case full of money was opportunity for an early retirement and most importantly, a new life.
Moss is the link between antagonist Anton Chigurh and protagonist Sheriff Bell. Moss is more than a guide, Moss advances the story. Moss takes the story to the next location. This is why readers might follow Moss instead of Sheriff Bell or Carla Jean. Anton Chigurh, the representation of the grim reaper, is the leading cause of death in this novel. Chigurh is discreet, hardnosed, disciplined, smart, and detached from our perception of reality. He murders with an almost passive demeanor. Moss has to confront Chigurh, his ‘death’ to live a better life. One of the few things Moss and Chigurh share in common is that they are both hunters. Both are capable, experienced, and patient. Sheriff Bell is the opposite of psychopathic killer and fatalist Anton Chigurh. Bell represents goodness. Most of the themes in the novel deal with Bell’s emotions and opinion on society. Bell’s opinions and thoughts are that of an older generation, struggling to advocate their version of the law against a new chaotic generation. Chigurh and Moss both represent motives of this new generation which Sheriff Bell has difficulty understanding. Chigurh and Bell are ultimately what No Country for Old Men is about because of what they represent.
Death is the central issue in No Country for Old Men because death is something everyone will have to face. Sheriff Bell 's problem is his fear of death. Bell lives a relatively safe life as sheriff of a small town with no interest in confronting death. Sheriff Bell, with his hazardous occupation, sees a world becoming increasingly dangerous. He gets worried unlike the newer generation who has no sense of it. Bell is disturbed because one day he must confront his own morality. Moss simply handles his sense morality better than Bell. In the beginning of the novel Moss has a conversation about going back to the crime scene with his wife Carla Jean. Moss, knowing he might not come back alive tells Carla Jean, “I’m fixin to go do something dumbern hell but I’m goin anyways. If I don’t come back tell mother I love her.” Carla Jean replies, “You mother’s dead Llewelyn” and Moss ends with “We’ll I’ll tell her myself then” (McCarthy 33). Unlike bell, Moss accepts the possibility he might not come home alive.
There is a moment in the novel when Moss talks to a woman outside of a motel. Moss says he is looking for what 's coming. Moss was referring to Chigurh. It could be said Moss was looking for his death. Ironically, Moss spent the entire story avoiding Chigurh, but could not stop what was "comin", dying in a way that he could not expect. The randomness of death is exactly what frightens Sheriff Bell. Moss could avoid Chigurh but could not avoid the Mexicans who ended up killing him. Moss was caught off guard. No Country for Old Men reassures that death can strike when you least expect it.
McCarthy did an exception job of misleading his audience into believing that Llewelyn Moss was the main protagonist in No Country for Old Men. By the end of the novel, it becomes evident that the real protagonist is Sheriff Bell. This adds an interesting take on how readers follow characters in a story. However, readers had good reason to believe No Country for Old Men was about Moss. Llewelyn Moss and was the first of the main three characters readers met. Moss is smart, experienced, and confident. These attributes helped mislead the audience into thinking he could get away and kill Chigurh. More notably, most of the action revolves around Moss. The story even seemed to follow Moss and his ultimate goal of getting away with the money. Moss had an upper hand in many ways but knew he could no longer get by on luck. Carson Wells, a man hired to get the money back, told Moss "This isn’going to go away. Even if you got lucky and took out one or more people-which is unlikely-they’ed just send someone else. Nothing would change. They’ll still find you. There’s nowhere to go (McCarthy 165).”
Moss generally has good intentions from his beginning to end. However, Moss made the decision to take the money because it was in his best interest. This money was a given opportunity at a better life. Most importantly, Moss is the link between Chigurh and Bell. McCarthy uses Moss to emphasize the underlining theme of the novel which is that death comes for everyone no matter how prepared you are. Unlike Sheriff Bell, Moss was able to confront his own mortality. He accepted the fact he might not get away with the money alive. The irony of the novel is that the audience spends immense amount of time following Moss, only to see him die abruptly and unexpectedly. Moss spent the whole story avoiding Chigurh, but could not stop what was coming, dying in a way that he could not expect. That is the reality of death, it strikes when you least expect it.

Work Cited
McCarthy, Cormac. No Country for Old Men. New York: Knopf, 2005. Android tablet.

Cited: McCarthy, Cormac. No Country for Old Men. New York: Knopf, 2005. Android tablet.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Many people may not have heard of Hugh O’Flaherty, but he is an unsung hero. Hugh was an Irish Catholic priest, who not only saved Jews and soldiers, but he also visited prison of war camps located in Italy. Along with his visits to the prison of war camps, he wanted to research and find out what happened to the prisoners that were reported as missing in action. In 1943, a plethora of people were released from the British prison of war camps because of Mussolini being removed from power. Fear was reembedded in the Jews, that were just released when the Germans overtook Italy. With the fear of being taken prisoner again embedded in their minds, the Jews that remembered Hugh visiting them in the camps decided that it was in their best interest…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Explore the ways in which John Steinbeck presents he character of Lennie in ‘Of Mice and Men’…

    • 2184 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the book Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck there are three characters that show person vs fate in a negative way. The book ends by George shooting Lennie at the end. George will turn into the average migrant worker because he does not have Lennie any more. Also, Crook's future is bad because of segregation. Finally, Curley's wife will not make it to Hollywood because she is married to Curley. With Lennie’s death it makes it very hard for george to try to achieve the American Dream.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lennie Small has a very symbolic importance in the novel Of Mice and Men. In the novel George Milton and Lennie Small both migrant workers pursue their dream of someday owning their own ranch by travelling around working as ranch hands to earn a living. The dream they share is to be able to "live off the fat of the land,". Lennie Small is a very complex character, although he may not appear to be at first glance. Lennie is the most interesting character in the novel because he differs from the other is many ways. Lennie Small ironically is a man of large stature and is very strong. He is child-like in his emotions and has a diminished mental capacity. Lennie's feelings are much like that of a normal person when you take into consideration that he is mentally retarded. One of Lennie's biggest concerns is that of a continued friendship with George. Throughout the novel their friendship is affirmed as Lennie states, "Because…… because I got you to look after me and you got me to look after you,". Lennie has a distrust of people except for George. Also, Lennie is not always sure about what is right and what is wrong; he relies on George to make the distinction for him. Lennie lacks the understanding that his actions have consequences. This is seen when he holds on to his pet mouse so tightly that he kills it. Lennie walks his way through life completely oblivious to the dangers of the world holding on to the dream of someday owning a farm with his best friend George.…

    • 2717 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Woe to Live On, by Daniel Woodrell, Jake Roedel experiences massacres, love, and ethical challenges during his adventures on the Kansas-Missouri Border during the Civil War. He joins a band Bushwhackers and searches the border Jayhawkers. When these two forces come in contact, battles ensue and result in the loss of countless lives. To survive in constant conflict, both sides ransack houses and kill civilians to find food and supplies. These events cause moral conflict inside Roedel and cause him to question what is right and wrong during war. Woodrell demonstrates the false sense of morality that soldiers gain from war and the true loss of ethics while providing examples of ethical behavior by Roedel as a model for ethical behavior.…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ‘Of Mice and Men’ is a novel written by John Steinbeck that was first published in 1937. Steinbeck has a very particular style of writing. He manages to provoke a deep emotion in the reader about one circumstance, for instance the killing of Candy’s dog, and then arguably less of a reaction about a considerably more tragic occurrence, the death of Lennie. This makes us question what’s valuable and puzzles the reader as to where their morals lie. The question of ‘was George wrong to shoot Lennie?’ is therefore a difficult and controversial one.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ‘Of Mice and Men’ is a story based around the hardships of migrant workers in the Great Depression of 1920’s and 30’s America. The story follows the central protagonists, George and Lennie as they settle into life at a new ranch. However through the climax of the story Lennie ends up in a tough situation, leaving George to kill his only friend. The question is was George right to shoot Lennie in their situation? Or did he betray his friend in the worst way possible? This essay will explore the predicament of George and whether the actions he took were indeed the right actions.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Of Mice and Men is a novella centred on the disincentives of America during the depression in the 1930’s. The country known as ‘the land of opportunity,’ is dismissed as it became deprived and inept. Many men were itinerant workers that travelled from ranch to ranch looking for wages that would be sufficient till they moved on. These types of men were the loneliest, with no companionship. It is this transient migrant lifestyle which highlights the importance of the relationship between Lennie and George, a rarity among the other characters to be exact.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The novel, Of Mice and Men, was written by John Steinbeck and is set in the Salinas Valley of northern California on a small ranch somewhere around the 1930’s. The novel is about the adventure of two men, George and Lennie, in hopes of achieving their dream to, “live off the fatta the lan’.” In the process of obtaining their dream, they are faced with a numerous amount of road blocks. The biggest road block would be when Lennie kills Curley’s wife, at this moment in the story all hopes of their dream have been put to rest. Steinbeck uses characterization in the novel to express empathy for a number of characters including Crooks, Lennie, and Curley’s wife.…

    • 135 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In life we are part of many roles that create dangers we face that may lie beyond our understanding. Even though these roles are hard to understand, they can give meaning to our life. In John 's Steinbeck "Of Mice and Men," we see these men 's day to day lives, the main character; George takes care of his friend Lennie who has difficulties understanding the rules of the world we live in. Through the story there are many ups and downs mostly involving Lennie, who is trying to see through the eyes of George and to do and be as George is. For this reason George is constantly trying to think of what is best for Lennie. Through all of this they face even more dangers and still try to find a way to raise money for a farm to call their own. George and Lennie show how the dangers we face can affect our lives for the better while everything fails around them. Danger is important in our lives, because it gives us the drive to go through day to day lives.…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through out John Steinbeck’s controversial novel, The Grapes of Wrath, the protagonist are faced with a daunting idea; that there is no ‘good’ and ‘bad’ forces in the world. Grapes of Wrath was published in an era filled with discrimination, hate, and fear directed at the fleeing “Okies”; in the early 1930’s the midwestern states where decimated by a foreseen but still devastating Dust Bowl. The reader joins the main characters, the Joad family, as they travel across the country hoping for work in a foreign state; California. Through out their trip they seem to come to believe that “there ain’t no sin and there ain’t no virtue” just people doing what people do. Yet the more they seem to believe this, the more the reader begins to see that there is in-fact a drastic flaw in their ideology. People do do horrible and good things, but those are what prove that Sin and Virtue do exist.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a child, our parents teach us values and principles. Most of the time the values they teach have been handed down through their families and changing them slightly to adapt to the time and culture. What if parent 's don 't teach their kids ethical values? What if over the years, people have decided that certain principles has become obsolete? A case in point is the story "A Good Man is Hard to Find" by Flannery O 'Conner. This story is a prime example of how people 's morals change throughout history. I propose that in order for us to get a better understanding of this story we need to analyze the theme of the story, evaluate the nature of the grandmother, and explore what the grandmother 's hat represents.…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The short story A Good Man is Hard to Find by Flannery O’Conner has brought about some interesting views and discussions within my target audience. Many of us found it difficult to read, because of the tragic ending and the way that it was written was a little out of our norm. Even though the southern slang and accents that the writer used in the story added character, it may have taken a second glance to determine what the writer was trying to convey. I know that everyone has taken different meanings from this story, and I am trying to point out that there is no right or wrong meaning. We have all agreed, in one way or another that the story points out morals and religion. In my original paper, I used the thesis there is no gray area in right or wrong and in this analysis I will continue to back that up with what the writing was trying to depict to us. I also will touch on morals and religion to further support my findings and add that morals and ethics do not change people do. Every one of us can find a different part of the story that we can relate to and tie it to our own lives. Whether it is 1950 or 2011 people and time change, but morals should not.…

    • 1619 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “There is a significant disparity of treatment in the way the criminal justice system handles things. Unfortunately, there's a double standard because there is a double standard in society.” David Raybin. In the novel, Of Mice and Men, by John Steinbeck; Steinbeck introduces two men, George and Lennie, who live in Salinas, California. The novel occurs in the 1930s, during the great depression; in the novel, both men go from one job to another as they try to purchase their own ‘American Dream’. The dream to build a shack with an acre of land, but as they struggle with life, their shot at achieving their dream disappears. Towards the end, George murders Lennie in order to solve problems that Lennie caused throughout the plot. Lennie’s murder is categorized as mercy killing; mercy killing is known as killing a person for the benefit of their own good. This novel makes it clear that mercy is the best way to kill people with disabilities, it takes the cruelty out of killing by making it more kind.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Alphabet

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages

    "Of Mice and Men" by John Steinbeck is a historical fiction play novelette. The novel is about the hardships of living in the Great Depression as a mentally challenged man. Lennie’s death was foreshadowed by what happened in Weed, and also by death of Curley’s wife. The ending of the novel is inevitable because of Lennie’s actions or other people’s reactions. George killed him in what he thought was a humane way to die.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays