Garcin's first example of displaying bad faith comes with what he does to his wife. He's not condemned for treating her badly or being and adulterer, but instead his bad faith comes not from his actions against his wife, but for his reasons for doing them. He defines his wife in a specific role – a victim – and refuses to see her as anything else. By self-deception he has tricked himself into believing his wife is an object and not a person. Sartre said “the self is something that can never be defined categorically; it exists outside of and beyond any description of it.” He identifies three different categories of "being." The first is called "being-in-itself," and this is the being we apply to objects, like a car. People, on the other hand are living creatures, so they're described as "being-for-itself." Humans will always be “being-for-itself” and never “being-in-itself” and that's the problem with giving some one a role such as Garcin gave to his wife as a victim, it's an attempt to exist in being-in-itself. With his self-deception of his wife being an object he is in bad faith.
Next Garcin tries to define his self as courageous, but according to Sartre to have the value of courage to be describing him, he must have been brave his whole life, even up to his death. He convinced himself into believing he was courageous, when in fact he really was a coward. In doing so he deceived himself into believing something that wasn't true about his own character traits, and made him in bad faith.
Sartre's last definition of “being” is “being-for others,” which is when you are turned into an object under the gaze of another person. Garcin being in the room with others, competitive subjectivity occurs, where people fight over who is going to be the subject and who's the object. This is why hell is other people because under someone else's gaze your under judgment of them and if you care what other people say then your under eternal judgment. This being-for-others is an escape for people in anguish of being so radically free according to Sartre's view of existentialism. Garcin chooses to flee; from his freedom and be defined not by his own actions or choices, but by the look and judgment of other people. His devotion to convince Estelle and Inez he is courageous, or his obsession with Gomez and his reputation on earth show he lives through being-for-others to feel good about himself by what other people think of him. Ultimately, this being-for-others bad faith is what dominates Garcin, and keeps him in hell.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Paul Sartre’s atheistic existentialism divides the world into 2 groups, authentic and inauthentic. Authentic people are distinguished by their deliberate choices to use their freedom to find purpose and meaning in their existence, while inauthentic people are characterized by passivity. John Gardner disagrees with moral relativism evidenced in Sartre’s existentialism and chooses to believe in moral absolutes. He portrays Grendel in his book Grendel as a condemnation of the moral relativism expressed by Jean Paul Sartre’s ideas of atheistic existentialism. Through Grendel 's experiences with contrasting religions and his philosophical mentors, Grendel chooses to embody Sartre’s idea of authenticity by terrorizing the people around him.…
- 1463 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Existential theory is a philosophical stance that stresses the importance of freedom of choice, free will and personal responsibility. This perspective stresses the unique experiences of each individual and the responsibility of each person for their choices and what they make of themselves. The practices of existential theory is often misperceived as some arcane, dark, pessimistic, impractical, cerebral, esoteric orientation to treatment. In fact, it is an exceedingly practical, concrete, positive and flexible approach.…
- 298 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Existentialism greatly supports free will, the idea that we are responsible in ourselves for our moral behaviour and it is our choices and actions that give us purpose. “It is only in our decisions that we are important.” Jean-Paul Sartre was a great believer in this: that everything depends on the individual and the meaning he gives to his life. He argued that all physical objects have an essence that…
- 956 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Within this particular interactive oral, the idea of whether the hell in No Exit is represented or disregarded as a theological Christian hell was presented upon us. Throughout time, the Christian hell has been depicted as a fiery, unforgiving place, as shown in the bible verses, Matthew 13:49b-50, “The angles will come and separate the wicked from the righteous and throw them into the blazing furnace, where there will be weeping and gnashing teeth” and Revelation 19:20b, “The two of them were thrown alive into the fiery lake of burning sulfur”. This theological hell has also been seen as place of separation from god and restlessness. At first glance, the hell in No Exit differs from a classic Christian theological hell in many ways.…
- 400 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Jean-Paul Sartre writes, in his essay, "Existentialism", that an individual's responsibility extends not only to him or herself, but also to all of humanity. He believes that we must take this into account for every decision we make. This extra accountability can cause distress for an individual because of the pressure that it brings. In Lorraine Hansberry's play, Les Blancs, Tshembe is faced with an important decision that will not only affect his own life, but the lives of his whole nation. Although none of Tshembe's decisions are without struggle, and irresolution, he reacts to the controversy before him by making choices in accordance with Sartre's definition of "good faith," despite the anguish it causes him.…
- 1679 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Sartre says Freedom of choice regardless of experiences. You are a free creature you may choose otherwise. “Existence Precedes Essence”…
- 399 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
This question assumes that Sartre argues for the freedom of humans, a fair assumption, due to his theories published on existentialism in his works “Existentialism and Humanism” and “Being and Nothingness”. This question uses the phrase ‘free’ as opposed to ‘free will’, a distinction which is clear through Sartre’s theories about a human’s metaphysical freedom. During this essay I will aim to evaluate the effectiveness of Sartre’s argument that human beings are fundamentally free. I shall draw on works from other existentialists such as Heidegger, Freudian psychoanalytical theories and other philosophers such as Kant, Husserl and Nietzsche.…
- 881 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Existentialism dwells on the concept of absurdity in life. It focuses on the conflict between the constant and intense search for meaning and the inability to find it. Existentialism also admits that the world is dominated by pain, frustration, sickness, contempt, malaise and death. (Barnes 1962) This is the main ideology behind Jean-Paul Sartre’s work, “Existentialist Ethics”. The existentialist ideology began to flourish during the Second World War. However, the existential system of thought can be traced back to earlier thinkers such as Friedrich Nietzsche. Who is a German philosopher and considered as one of the most provocative and influential thinkers of the late nineteenth century who challenged the foundations of Christianity. (Robert Wicks, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) Nietzsche 's philosophy is that ' 'God is dead ' ' and he calls for a ' 'revaluation of all values ' ' in his book Thus Spoke Zarathustra. Both Nietzsche and Sartre are atheistic existentialists and agree that “God is dead”, and that human beings must take responsibility for their own actions. The philosophers have a lot of parallels between their thought, and also many differences. The purpose of the final essay is to show that although Nietzsche and Sartre are atheist philosophers, they have different interpretations of the death of God. The paper will also examine how both thinkers share a similar understanding of human freedom and the meaning of life.…
- 832 Words
- 3 Pages
Better Essays -
Existentialism is a philosophy that explains the journey to discover the true self and the meaning of life by free will, choice and personal responsibility. By their conscious or unconscious actions, the protagonists, Siddhartha and Meursault are examples of existentialists and radical individuals, who refuse to conform to the norms of their respective societies.…
- 1544 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Albert Camus’ The Stranger explores the philosophic ideology of existentialism in the character Meursault. Meursault is a man in the 1920s in French Algeria going through life seeing and acting through the lens of an existentialist. Without explicitly stating that he lives existentially, his life hits on many key characteristics of an existentialist. Perhaps the most defining of these key characteristics is that he does what he wants, because he can. He also does this because in existentialism there is emphasis on individual choice and freedom based on the assertion that there is no universal right and wrong. Meursault doesn’t always take into consideration what would be polite, or kind, but rather only thinks of what he wants to do and makes his own independent decision every time. I believe this sort of thinking is dangerous and wrong and that people should make their own decisions while still deeply thinking about whether that action is right or wrong, and taking into consideration the impact that the decision will have on other people.…
- 1278 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Jean-Paul Sartre’s play No Exit is a symbolic definition of Sartrean existentialism that entails characters pretending to be something they are not through themes “self-deception” and “bad faith,” which satisfies Sartre’s “philosophical argument.” The play also support Sartre’s doctrine, “existence precedes essence,” through the plays central themes of freedom and responsibility.…
- 374 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Sartre believed that we are aware of our existence. Human nature is created by us so no one is the same. Our actions and existence is our own…
- 1151 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The real standard of existentialism is the dismissal of God, which is extremely apparent in Camus' The Stranger, where the protagonist, Meursault, declines the idea of God's existence. Most of the existentialists believed that there are two replacements for the issue of God, either individuals are not free and God, the supreme, is in charge of shrewdness; or individuals are free and dependable yet God is not supreme. When it comes to Meursault, the second option appears to be a more grounded likelihood, which implies that God is not almighty, and man gets to be god, who likes to stay and face the world and its absurdity by battling against it. Though Camus did not consider himself as a part of The Theatre of Absurd, most of his works were witnessed to be somehow related to the idea of how the world is an absurd place. Therefore, though he refused to be labelled as a existentialist, he is considered to be one.…
- 425 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The philosophy that is existentialism is “a philosophical movement which exercised an influence on many of the arts as well as on philosophy and psychology.” The belief in people have free will and can choose what they want to be is in other words what existentialism. Existentialism was a philosophical movement that dealt with the ideas of the way of life by many philosophers such as Jean-Paul Sartre. Sartre did not agree with traditional arguments of human nature he argued that in the case of human beings “existence precedes essence.” In his famous quote, the meaning is that humans have no set or fixed nature that determines what they will do.…
- 631 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In the play "No exit", Sean-Paul Sartre portrays existentialism by employing three distinguished characters to bring out its meaning. The play starts in a single room setting with no windows, no mirrors, just one door. Three characters are then introduced to this room starting with Garcin followed by Inez then Estelle. The reader learns that this so called "room" is their hell, and while they are waiting for the demons and torturers, the real emotional torture begins as they taunt each others' weaknesses and sins. The theme of this play rises from these events as the reader learns that "hell is other people" and that one should take responsibility of his/her actions. This reinforces existentialism as well as their constant struggle with facing the truth as they thrive to prove that they are still alive, existent, that is. Garcin tries to prove that he is not a coward and Estelle hunts down all means of looking at her physical appearance thinking that a mirror would prove her existence. Conversely, Inez seems to be the most realistic and honest one of them as she confesses her sins and accepts her being dead. This conflict carries on till the end of the play where all three finally deal with their condition. The themes of this play are highlighted through the characters, their relationships and dialogue, all of which will be discussed.…
- 1388 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays