Preview

No Propagation in the Union of Gay Marriage

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2081 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
No Propagation in the Union of Gay Marriage
No Propagation in the Union of Gay Marriage
(My response to the e-mail article seen below)
The Law can never protect marriage; neither can it prevent gay relationships. It is the law written on the heart, and conscience that either accuse us or tell us that we are doing right. Sexual behavior cannot be legislated, since the law does not prevent us from doing anything. If the law could, then there would be no need for salvation. The constitutional provision will be futile.
The institution of marriage is threatened for many reasons: :Blindness because of the self-life, fear of a loss of identity /distinctiveness, hidden dimensions of competition, isolationist tendencies and positions, lack of trust, fear of being hurt or used, disobedience, hardness of heart, lack of knowledge or wrong choices. The act of adultery begins in the heart. No constitution bill can curb adulterous behavior. The main threat to marriage is incorrect heart position, not adultery. Two parties should enter into marriage with a corporate agreement to work jointly towards a common goal of pursuing the purpose of God for that marriage. The problem arises when we look at what is beneficial to us and not the union of marriage. We must first understand what it is that we were brought together to achieve. We must know what we are together to do. When we work towards His will instead of our personal satisfaction, greater marital satisfaction is achieved. That is why the things that God has placed in the marriage to enhance it, actually brings pain and destroys it. When the enemy enters a marriage it attacks the weakest area.
We have become so used to an unrighteous society, that only what we perceive to be “the extreme” calls our attention. Are we striving for socially acceptable domestic arrangement or do we want to be obedient and fear God. By no means am I condoning a gay lifestyle, do not hear me wrong. The harm caused in a home where the husband or wife is gay is not any worse than a home

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Marriage is an important aspect of our society and has been a recurring theme throughout the…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Grover Cleveland is the man responsible for establishing a trend of New York Governors: to be involved in a sex scandal. For that, David Paterson and Eliot Spitzer salute him. Cleveland was right in the middle of his 1885 presidential campaign when his opponent, James Blaine, dug up some serious dirt on the dubbed “Grover the Good.” On July 24, 1884, the Buffalo Evening Post published an article entitled “A Terrible Tale: A Dark Chapter in a Public Man’s History,” which was subtitled “The Pitiful story of Maria Halpin and Grover Cleveland’s son.” Cleveland was accused of having sexual relations with Miss Halpin, resulting in a son, Oscar Halpin. It became a national scandal and his republican opponents began chanting “Ma, ma, where’s my pa?”…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The dynamics of marriage have changed though; the definition of what marriage is coming into question. Is marriage only between a man and a woman? My personal opinion is that anyone should be able to marry, but the best design for a family is one of a man and woman. Many would object to this strict definition, but the impact of a child raised by a gay or lesbian couple must be taken into account. Bulling is a reality and children with different situations at home are easier to fall prey to it. Some might also have an issue with a gay or lesbian raising a child of the same sex. These same people would argue they would offer a very unorthodox home that condones same sex relationships. Another issue that has faced families in the last few decades is that of income. Women in our society have more freedom than ever before. Women now more often than not account for an equal share of the household income, making raising a family more difficult. In the past women were only expected to raise the children, but now bringing home an income is also necessary. The ways we view and have changed marriage today will forever shape our society for generations to come…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The marriage-rights movement headed by gay rights activists has been a relevant issue on the American socio-political docket since 1970 following the Stonewall riots in New York City, New York in June of 1969. The riots sparked an initiative for gay people to join the movement of other marginalized groups in a quest to counteract widespread alienation to obtain the equal treatment and recognition they deserved. Today those activists joined by a whole new generation of proud homosexuals are still fighting for the right to be able to walk down an isle and commit their minds, bodies, and souls to the one they love in front of the people they love and have it be more than an impotent symbol of affection; they want their union to be recognized both socially and legally as a different but equal lifestyle choice. They want to partake in marriage, not "marriage". The most familiar argument that we hear today in the war fought by traditionalists and activists is the argument for the purpose of marriage. Traditionalists like Rick Santorum would argue along the lines that the purpose for marriage is children. Most gay activist would argue that the purpose for marriage is finding love in a lifelong companion. In Gay Marriage: Why It Is Good For Gays, Good For Straights And Good For America, Jonathan Rauch, an openly gay male, explains how gay marriage would be a universal good. Marriage has evolved over the years “nearly beyond recognition”[1] from wealthy aristocratic polygamy used to impose socially structured dominance over women, to a business merger whose main goal was financial security for women and a pool of family ties, to an institution bent on maintaining social norms and gender specialization, to our present marriage where love, an unstable chemical reaction, is on the forefront of the reasons to marry.[2] He argues that the marriage portrait is not as distinctively black and white as some would…

    • 2792 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though in the U.S. Constitution it does not specify anything about marriage whether it is homosexual or heterosexual, the constitution was designed to ensure that a federal government was established and to ensure equal rights to all citizens of the nation. In 1996 the Federal Defense of Marriage Act prevented any states from legalizing gay marriage however that was proven to be unconstitutional because it restricts the states to define marriage and prohibits gay couples the same rights and benefits as heterosexual couples. (Lavoie, 2012 Gay Marriage Law…) This all boils down to one underlying statement that many gay rights activist are battling for every day and that is that denying homosexuals the equal right to marry just as their heterosexual counterpart has the right to marry his or her significant other, is unconstitutional discrimination and that by prohibiting such an act to a certain group of people is not only in…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Starting with the last prompt of the assignment, according to our textbook, “Win-win orientations assume that there are usually ways to resolve differences so that everyone gains…When all people are committed to finding a mutually acceptable solution, a win-win resolution is possible” (Wood, 2009, p. 230). Unfortunately, here is the precise problem with the religious zealots who call themselves Christians. They are forever stuck in a win-lose orientation. What becomes ludicrous is they believe somehow, the human right to share love with an individual of the same sex in a committed relationship with all of the legal benefits will cause strife for them. None of the gay population is telling them to marry same-sex individual yet they insist, if gays want to marry and raise a family, it must be with someone of the opposite sex. Heterosexuals are doing such an exemplary job of getting marriage right that is common knowledge the divorce rate hovers around fifty percent. The point here is the INSTITUION OF MARRIAGE has been in the toilet for quite some time now and the only thing extending the legal right to gay couples will do is boost the economy with fabulously lavish weddings and then the inevitable lining of divorce lawyers’ pockets.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whether an individual is against gay marriage or for it, we all have an opinion on the issue. Andrew Sullivan’s describes how marriage as a basic need for individuals no matter their sexual orientation. However, William Bennett believes that “same- sex marriage would do significant, long term social damage” (1138). Whether we like it or not gay marriage influences marriage institution, culture, and their children.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prop 8

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are many reasons why we have the Bill of Rights and one of them is to create equal protection amendments. Denying marriage to a homosexual couple is not anymore different than denying marriage between a Hispanic, Black or any other minority couple. Rejecting homosexual couples is a violation of religious freedom and minority discrimination. What right does the government have to say in who can’t get married? Would you like it if people vote for your marriage? I didn’t think so, its obviously unfair for strangers that have never met you in your life to chose your future. Its very likely and very much proven through evidence and research that homosexuality is genetic. Is the government going to ban unfertile or disable people from getting married too? Our country is supposed to be based on Liberty, Justice, and Equality, not pure ignorance.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalism is supposed to be the safe-fail for the American government so that the American people are best represented and their best interests are upheld. The Constitution grants powers to both the state governments as well as the national government as the Founders could see the benefits for trying to stabilize a nation but not put the whole nation under the scrutiny of one power. With the powers being divided yet limitedly intertwined has caused quite a few national problems as of late with the largest one being on who gets to decide whether or not gays should be allowed to marry and be treated like a married couple.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gay Marriage and Conflict

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On the outside looking in, it is rather apparent that there are two objectives in regards to gay marriage; those who say “green-light” and those who say “red-light”. In essence, when you consider the marriage battle between homosexuals and heterosexuals -- it’s like fire and ice; they both have the potential to overcome each other’s privileged power. “It’s this tug of war between whose gut feeling is better or morally correct that perpetuates the cycle of bitter feelings,” suggests David Myers , a spokesperson for gay rights (Myers & Scanzoni, 2005, p. 129). When we take into consideration the lenses model, you quickly notice that you have three parties – one that is for the institution of gay marriage, one that is against it, and one that is liaison between the both (the government). Those who say “green light” for gay marriage see themselves as being “ostracized by the other parties for wanting to belong” (Myers & Scanzoni, 2005, p. 13). Rather than being avoidant, this party finds it more promising to just promote “collaboration as they find an integrative solution that will satisfy both the other parties” (Hocker & Wilmot, 2007, p. 163). Meanwhile, those who say “red light” to gay marriage either see their counterparts (the “green lighters” and the government) as unmoral tradition breaking savages (Myers & Scanzoni, 2005, p. 113). They believe in that the perfect union in marriage as that of a heterosexual bases rather than a homosexual. The government on the other hand sees itself as the crowd pleaser. They are persuaded by the vote of the masses and see their part only as one who acts accordingly to the public interest.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    If there is anything that gets me riled up and ready to debate, it’s the controversial topic of gay rights and those who appose them. In Charles Colson and Anne Morse’s essay opposing gay marriage, “Societal Suicide,” they express that marriage should be seen as a “traditional building block of human society.” It goes on to explain their tired and bias conclusion that marriage is a bond that should only be between a man and a woman. At the same time, they question the extinction of marriage because of same-sex couple’s oppressed desire to happily marry each other. How is making it legal for supporters of marriage and gay people in love to express their bond considered the end of marriage? Allowing gays to marry would not only promote marriage, but it would support the obvious right and humane decision to care for every citizen with liberty and justice for ALL! “Societal Suicide” explains that gay marriage is not only wrong, but goes against the natural order of the family system, as well as promotes “broken families” and crime amongst young people without mothers or fathers, all the while, weakening the meaning and status of heterosexual marriage. I do not believe in any reason for keeping people from being who they are if there is no harm being done to others. Gay marriage should absolutely be legalized because we all deserve equal rights regardless of skin color, religion, ethnicity, occupation, or sexuality.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Your example of same sex marriage provided a perfect example of modern law contraindicating Biblical law. The Bible is clear in many areas as it relates to homosexuality; in Leviticus “[I]f a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.” Leviticus 20:13 (King James). However, there many of our modern laws still have biblical foundations; Virginia State Statue- § 18.2-31 Capital murder defined; punishment, (VA. STAT. § 18.2-31 https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title18.2/chapter4/section18.2-31/.) still has the punishment of death. This is supported in Leviticus; “[A]nd he that killeth any man shall surely be put to death.” Leviticus 24:17 (King…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gay marriage has been the cause of intense debate in the United States for years. Sexual activity within the same gender was something that was considered normal in Greek and Roman times but in today’s society, there is a great amount of controversy concerning sexual activity between homosexuals and same-sex marriage. A couple of reasons why gay marriage has become so controversial is because of religion, the issue of procreation, and the concern for children who are raised in same sex house-holds. Although there are a great deal of people who find gay marriage to be considered a negative idea, there is also a significant amount of people who are for gay marriage and would like gay marriage to be legal in the United States. According to The Associated Press 3/27/13, a “Pew Research Center poll” that took place in March shows that the number of people in America who approve gay marriage are up to forty-nine percent and there is forty-four percent of people who do not approve (par.6). These percentages show that both sides of opinion come close in number and when there is a great amount of differences in opinion on one given subject, conflict will certainly arise.…

    • 1599 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Can the courts or the law tell the people in what way they can be intimate with their partners? Throughout the history of the United states there has been some constitutional controversy concerning which rights we possess that are protected under the constitution. Controversy has also surrounded who the constitution protects. At one time it was said that no person of African American race was or would ever be citizens of the united states. This was changed with the Fourteenth Amendment to the constitution. This fact leads me to believe that gay rights will continue to progress even though it has been a slow moving process. For decades there has been the issue of Gay rights and some of the courts controversial decisions have stemmed from cases regarding gay rights. A couple of these controversial cases have been of the cases the 1986 case of Bowers vs. Hardwick, and the 2003 case of Lawrence vs. Texas. All three of these case involve gay rights and virtually the rights of adult individuals to engage in sexual activities with other consenting adults of the same or opposite sex. Many cases have gone to the supreme court to decide the constitutionality of these issues pertaining to gay rights, Even though it is in the power of the supreme court to interpret the laws and the constitution, sometimes the Supreme Court makes the wrong decision. There was a point in time when the Supreme Court gave consent to the states to criminalize the act of adult males to engage in sexual sodomy in the privacy of their own homes. In the…

    • 2624 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pro Gay Marriage

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In it's role as a moral of teacher, the law now misleads America about the true nature of marriage. Ever since the court case, Obergefell v. Hodges, in the summer of 2015 gay marriage has been documented as legal in all 50 states according to the Constitution. Nowadays, it seems as if those who hold pubic office are straying away from the founding fathers original intent, which was to build a nation based off of Judeo Christian values. Same sex marriage is one of the many issues that contributes to the downward spiral of the moral fiber of The United States. Same sex marriage should be repealed in The United States in order to restore the original intent of marriage.…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics