Preview

Noel Gifts International Limited Balance Sheet Report

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1785 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Noel Gifts International Limited Balance Sheet Report
About NOEL Group Gifts International
Founded in 1975, Noel Gifts International Ltd is a Singapore-based company engaging in activities which are grouped into two divisions namely, Gifts and Properties. The Gifts division involves the online sale of gift hampers and floral arrangements in Singapore and Southeast Asia, as well as the management of the franchise programme. This division encompasses a few subsidiaries; Humming Flowers & Gifts Pte Ltd, Noel Hampers & Gifts (Johore) Sdn. Bhd. and Noel Hampers & Gifts (Penang) Sdn. Bhd. In early 2012, the Company extended their operations to China when Noel Gifts (Chengdu) Co. Ltd (NGC) was incorporated into the group. The Properties division manages the investment and and development of properties, comprising a significant portion of the Company’s income.
Growth Stagnation
The company has a good margin on sales, a very good liquidity position, along with almost negligible debts and servicing of interest. Such a situation is not ideal because this means the company is being too conservative and as a result, growth has been stagnating.
High Liquidity
The current ratio measures a company’s ability to pay off its short-term liabilities with its current assets. From 2008 to 2012, the company has enjoyed a high current ratio, indicating that they possess a significant amount of current assets as compared to short-term liabilities. This also shows that they have high liquidity, and are able to readily turn their products into cash. In 2012, the current ratio for the gifts industry stood at 2.11, while the company’s stood at 5.56. The average current ratio for the gifts industry over the past 5 years currently stands at 1.73. As a leading entity in the gifts industry, Noel Gifts International has been consistently performing higher than the gifts industry. Their high current ratio puts them in good stead to continue paying off their short-term obligations with ease.
The acid test ratio measures a company’s

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Patton Fuller Ratio

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Current Ratio decrease, due to assests, and an increase in liabilities, which indicates a 2.23% change in the ratio of assets to liabilities. The sharp drop in cash was offset by large rises in Net Accounts Receivable and Inventory, which are ordinarily unfavorable events also. However, if significant supplies were purchased (due to vendor discounts), the increase in Inventory could have been an astute business decision. The uncollected Accounts Receivables are troublesome.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Acct-504 Final Project

    • 1253 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The current ratio is defined as the current assets divided by the current liabilities for a given period. This ratio is important because it helps measure a company’s ability to pay their current liabilities with their current assets. This shows helps determine the liquidity of the companies and their ability to respond to market opportunities. Tootsie Roll has a current ratio of 3.25 in 2012 and 3.99 in 2013(an 18.5 percent increase). Hershey, on the other hand, has a current ratio of 1.44 and 1.77 (also an 18.5 percent increase) respectively. Both companies have increased year over year. As the current ratio shows, the Tootsie maintains a healthier ratio, but both have improved at the same rate.…

    • 1253 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Current ratio is a simple way for the business to use to calculate its liquidity. The current ratio shows that Greggs performance in 2010 that Greggs has 74p worth to every £1 that the business owes. And this means that the business is able to pay its debts easily out of the current assets.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    EGT1 Task 3

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The first ratio calculated was current ratio. This is done by dividing current liabilities by current assets. Current ratio is important because it shows the business’s ability to pay back the current liabilities with the current assets that they have available to them. At the end of 2011, the current ratio was at 1.86. In 2012, this ratio dropped to 1.80. The industry ranges from 3.1 (showing a strong ability to pay back liabilities) to 1.4 (showing a weak ability to pay back liabilities) with a median of 2.1. Company G is below the median showing a weakness in this category.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A. Current Ratio: The ability for a company to pay short term obligations is measured by this ratio. In 2011 Company G moved from 1.86 to 1.77. Compared to the 1.9 Home Center Retail Benchmarks industry ratio, the numbers are below standards. Current Ratio represents values above 2 quartile industry benchmarks data (1.4 to 2.1). Current Ratio represents a weakness for Company G.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cango Financial Ananlysis

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Rapid growth seems to be a blessing. However, it depends on the company’s ability how they deal with it. The holiday season of 2009 showed the company’s inability to handle the orders that it received. Orders were not sent on time. Moreover, it delivered wrong order at times. To make the matters worse, the company was totally unable to fill some orders at all. This customer dissatisfaction might adversely affect the company’s future sales revenue.…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ACC/291 March 25,2012 Liquidity Ratios Current Ratio: Current Assets/Current Liabilities 2005 $14,555,092/ $6,974,752= 2.09:1 2004 $14,643,456/ $6,029,696=2.43:1 Acid Test Ratio: Cash+ Short-Term Investments + Receivables (Net)/ Current Liabilities 2005 $305,563 + $283,583 +$6,133,663/ $6,974,752= .96:1 2004 $357,216 + $133,504 + $5,775,104/ $6,029,696=1.04:1 Receivables Turnover: Net Credit Sales/ Average Net Receivables 2005 $50,823,685/ ($6,133,663 + 5,775,104/2) $50,823,685/ $5,954,384= 8.54 times 2004 $46,044,288/($5,775,104+6,569,344/2) $46,044,288/ $6,172,224=7,46 times Inventory Turnover: Cost of Goods Sold/ Average Inventory 2005 $42,037,624/ ($7,850,970+$7,854,112/2) $42,037,624/$7,852,541=5.35 times 2004 $37,480,050/ ($7,854,112+8,074,880/2) $37,480,050/ $7,964,496=4.71 times Profitability Ratios Current Assets 2004 2005…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The current ratio and acid test ratio both show that C & V Fashions were solvent this year and that they are able to pay of their debts. As well as being able to pay off their debts, the business has some capital left over which is doing nothing and can be used for various purposes such as investments or extra materials. The current ratio states that the business has over £3 of current assets for every £1 of current liabilities.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tootsie Roll vs Hershey

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Liquidity ratios measure the short-term ability a company to pay its obligations and meet unexpected needs of cash. These numbers can be found by analyzing the company’s balance sheet. The company that closely matches or exceeds the industry averages in liquidity is Tootsie Roll. Tootsie Roll’s current ratio of 2.34 exceeds that of the industries 1.29. They also have a lower cash to debt ratio 1.05 (2.37 industry, days in inventory 63.98 (industry 72.7) and a quicker inventory turnover 5.7 (industry 6.05). The only ratio were Hershey exceeds Tootsie Roll is receivables turnover ratio. Hershey collects more of its receivables but Tootsie Roll collects faster. Tootsie Roll is better suited to collect cash quickly to pay its obligations and meet unexpected cash needs.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fnt Task 1

    • 1124 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Current Ratio” measures the ability to pay current liabilities with current assets. The current assets divided by current liabilities. In 2011 the current ratio was 1.86. By 2012, it decreased to 1.79 rating in the lower second quartile group in the industry. Company G’s ability to repay its debt is consistent with showing a weakness from year to year based on the industry’s quartiles of 3.1 with a strong ability to cover liabilities 2.1median to 1.4 stating an weakness.…

    • 1124 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Explanation: A current ratio is calculated in order to measure whether or not a company can successfully pay short term debt obligations. With a current ratio of 1.43%, ABC SDN.BHD has a healthy current ratio.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Generally this metric measures the overall liquidity position of a company. It is certainly not a perfect barometer, but good enough. Watch for big decreases in this number over time. Make sure the accounts listed in current assets are collectible.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case 1 Mystic Monk Coffee

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It has had a good financial performance but not advance in market or company competitive strength…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Baldwin Bicycle Case

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The current ratio indicates they do have enough current assets to pay off current liabilities.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Premier Furniture Case

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The current ratio captures the short-term liquidity of the firm and since debt payments are ultimately made from cash, the current ratio measures the extent to which current assets are available to make payments. Designers’ current ratios are as follows: 2.3964 in 1982, 2.2772 in 1983, and 2.7016 in 1984; whereas Walcott’s are: 1.3921 in 1983 and 1.4594 in 1984. Designers’ seems to be a more short-term liquid company which is an appealing factor when dealing with credit…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays