Non-Calories-Free Foods: A Case Study

Although government tried efforts to taper off the food subsidiaries during 1960s, in order to cover the poor growing year and admit the agreement with the Soviet Union to sell millions of grain to them, the first term of Nixon administration, with no alternative, develop a suit of programs to increase the production, according to Scott’s word. Workings too hard always make the opposite results, in the end, the basic commodities such as wheat, corn, soybeans and cotton was a surplus and the price of these dropping in the market. Due to the low price of these by-products such as HFCS, Hydrogenated fats, and corn-fed meats, and the cheapest method to let foods taste yummy is to add fat and sugar. Until 1996, mentioned by Scott, the Freedom to Farm of nutrition implementation applied, the relationship between
HFCS strongly influence the American eating habit and put American’s health into a depth of despair. Research showed that between the years from 1970 to 1990, American consumed HFCS as a sugar substitute has increased 1000%. “It now represents 40% of the non-calorie-free sweeteners added to U.S foods and is virtually the only source of sweeteners for soft drinks.” Scott mentioned. Overly in taking of HFCS is also coming with economical concern. HFCS is very cheap, which has allowed for “25¢ snack cakes, 60¢ candy bars, and especially giant-sized soft drinks in stores” declared by Scott Field on The fact on the land. Although people immersed in the fantasies created by HFCS, cheap and non-calories, the function of human body to process fructose is totally different from it does glucose, which means even HFCS doesn’t come with calories, but doesn’t mean it couldn’t directly transfer fructose into fat. So, it is not surprising that HFCS’s sales skyrocket, the American waistline is keeping