Preview

Nonesuch Vs. Sunshine Hospital: A Case Study

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1275 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nonesuch Vs. Sunshine Hospital: A Case Study
In 2016, Dr. Alexander Nonesuch, a doctor at Sunshine Hospital in the State of Discontent, failed to disclose that he was transgender on his employment application before he started working there in February 2015. Dr. Nonesuch, the plaintiff, married his wife, Renata Mercure, in June 2015. Since Renata was expecting twins on April 1st, 2016, Dr. Nonesuch requested paternity leave and to add his wife and children to his retirement plan. Since the hospital’s management and the board saw Dr. Alexander Nonesuch’s marriage as a same-sex marriage, which is illegal in the State of Discontent. The hospital denied his requests on March 5th; two days after Dr. Nonesuch made his requests on March 3rd, 2016. However, Sunshine Hospital, the defendant, would …show more content…
Nonesuch. This was the case, as they did not put an area on the application for him to note his sex at birth, meaning that technically, Dr. Nonesuch did not violate any rules. A case that could somewhat compare to this one would be Johnson v. Misericordia Community Hospital (1999). Not unlike when Sunshine Hospital failed to get information on Dr. Nonesuch’s sex at birth on his application as well at his subsequent interview, Misericordia Community Hospital in Wisconsin did not do their due diligence when hiring Dr. Salinsky to work for them (Johnson v. Misericordia Community Hospital). This case came up after James Johnson, the plaintiff in Misericordia, sued Dr. Salinsky after he severed an artery in Johnson’s leg while trying to remove a pin fragment in his hip (Johnson v. Misericordia Community Hospital). Ultimately, the plaintiff settled with the doctor, who was apportioned 80% of the liability by the jury under the finding of corporate negligence (Johnson v. Misericordia Community Hospital). However, what was uncovered proved to be far more problematic, as the hospital failed to uncover information about Dr. Salinsky that would impact his performance, such as the fact that he lost his staff privileges at St. Anthony’s Hospital in 1971, had his orthopedic privileges revoked at another hospital, and lied about being on the consulting staff at New Berlin Memorial Hospital and Northwest General Hospital (Johnson v. Misericordia Community Hospital). Not unlike Dr. Salinsky in the Misericordia case, Dr. Nonesuch was not completely honest when he was applying or being interviewed by Sunshine Hospital, as he failed to disclose that he was transgender by not telling them his sex at birth. At the same time, unlike Misericordia, Dr. Alexander Nonesuch was not being terminated for performance related issues as far as we know. For these reasons, Sunshine Hospital

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The gynaecologist, the anaesthesiologist, VanHoey and the doctors’ were sued by Mullins for battery and other claims. A summary judgment was granted for the defendants by the trial court on…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: On April 1984, Plaintiffs, Roxanne and Steven filed a complaint against defendants, Carter F. Dillman and Webster Hospital Association. Alleging, amongst other things the defendant was negligent, careless, and failed to comply with the standard of care during a medical practice for permanent sterilization. The Plaintiff wanted damages because she was not permanently sterilized and was able to conceived a healthy child. She wanted damages to include the expenses of their pregnancy, the cost of raising a child, the child’s education, medical and other expenses; such as loss wages, loss of consortium, and expenses for and unsuccessful tubal ligation. The defendant filed a motion to dismiss on grounds that the plaintiff failed to state the claim for which relief could be granted because they felt that the child was healthy.…

    • 540 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: In December 1973 Robert Steinberg, the plaintiff, applied for admissions to the Chicago Medical School. He paid an application fee of $15, but his application was rejected. After being rejected he filed against the school, claiming that they did not evaluate his application according to the academic entrance criteria printed in the school’s bulletin. Steinberg argues that the school based its decision primarily on nonacademic consideration such as family connections between the applicant and his family to donate large sums of money to the school. Steinberg assets that by evaluating his application to these unpublished criteria, the school breached the contract it had created when it accepted…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Name: Traine Smith, Appellant v. Friends Hospital, Dewight Magwood, Benjamin Messina, Ronald Potter, Robert Anthony and Dewayne Thomas, Appellees…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The legal case of Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. is a sex discrimination case under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. “Title VII specifically forbids any employer to … discriminate with respect to compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment in any way that would deprive any individual of employment opportunity due to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.” (Twomey, 2013, p. 397). In this case, Oncale claimed that he was being discriminated against in his workplace because of his sex. In reading the case online, Oncale was “was forcibly subjected to sex-related, humiliating actions against him … in the presence of the rest…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Spence case, both parties were in a lawsuit about informed consent. The physician failed to tell the patient of the risks that can happen while going into surgery and any risks that can happen after the surgery. The patient was told of the surgery but did not ask for any additional information. For my personal choice in this case i would find both sides responsible for some of the factors that has happened in the decision making of the physician and the patient. I believe that if the patient has a well grounded mind then the physician should tell them about all the risks for the precare, the surgery itself, and the postoperative care. All of this information can help to save the hospital from a lawsuit. Also, when the patient is presented with an illness that can be helped with an operation they should always do some research about it. This includes being able to ask additional questions and concerns to the…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The facts in the case of Thompson V North American Stainless, LP 562 U.S._ (2011) are fairly straightforward. The petitioner in this case, Eric Thompson, was seemingly fired from his job at North American Stainless (NAS) because his fiancée, Miriam Regalado filed a sexual discrimination charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). His suit was filed under Title VII claiming that his dismissal was retaliation for his fiancée’s charge. (Pagnattaro, Cahoy, Magid, Reed, & Shedd, n.d.)…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shortly after plaintiff Nosrat Khajavi (Khajavi), an anesthesiologist, and defendant, Robert Del Pero, a surgeon, engaged in an altercation over the wisdom of proceeding with a particular surgery, defendant Feather River Anesthesia Medical Group (Feather River) terminated Khajavi’s employment. At trial, the court non-suited Khajavi’s claims that defendants Feather River and Robert Del Pero had discharged him, and conspired to discharge him, in violation of public policy -- that is, in retaliation for advocating “medically appropriate health care” in violation of Business and Professions Code section 2056.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this case the court considered the defendant’s argument that discrimination on the basis of sex because of safety concerns is allowed in certain situations. To help illustrate this point the court examined Dothard v. Rawlinson, a case where a maximum-security male penitentiary was allowed to hire only male guards to be in contact with inmates because more was at stake then simply their own safety. This case, used by the defendant, was rejected by the court in that in this situation the well being of third parties were not involved. The court also considered that while there was a risk to the fetus, the extent of injury that is likely to occur was not addressed. Even without this information, the policy reaches to far in that there is no showing that it is necessary to ensure the safe and efficient operation of Johnson Controls. The court also considered that until 1982, Johnson Controls operated without this policy and has since failed to provide information to lead one to believe that it is reasonably necessary to its normal operations or that they suffered any adverse effects prior to its…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the case against Ablon, a jury found for Dr. Greene and awarded him $19,000. The case was applied and the First Circuit agreed with the district courts findings. However, the judgment findings against Dr. Ablon were overturned. The courts explanations for the MGH verdict were that since Dr. Greene was employed with MGH at the time that his contracts with MGH allowed the hospital access and usage of Dr. Greene’s findings and treatments. The overturn of the lower court’s decision in the case of Dr. Ablon, was based off “ the district court erred in ruling that Treating Explosive Kids could not be both joint and derivative as a matter of law” (Justia, 2015).…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Natalie, You share an example that relates to defamation very well. There are so many issues in this case that, it is disturbing just to think about. Where the surgeons go wrong and create defamation is when they are consciously and intentionally placing false information into the patient's chart. This is such a frustrating case because it makes you wonder what the reasoning behind the false diagnosis was. I don't understand how there could be any benefit to the institution.…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethical Consideration

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages

    If I were a judge in the Brownfield v. Daniel Freeman Marina Hospital case, I would have agreed with…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In order to be more aware of what things play a part in privilege, power, and inequality , we covered quite a few topics related to the privilege non trans people have and how certain parts that are normal and taken for granted are used to hold power over and discriminate against trans individuals. One of these topics being the that some medical professionals act as gatekeepers to the medical necessities of trans individuals. Trans people are required by some professionals to prove that they are trans but dressing a certain way that matched up traditionally with the gender you identified as (Serano, 2016). For these situations trans people were required to pass as their gender though not for their sake but for the sake of non trans people who would be made uncomfortable by the knowledge or presence of a trans person. Another problem tied in with the medical aspect of transgender discrimination…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bernadette Harrigan, an assistant vice president in law department of the Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance made a statement that in 2013, the face of the nation would be changing and to be competitive, to win in business today, companies needed to change with the demographics of the nation. As an insurance company, the costs associated with maintaining a dual system for claims are perhaps high which could be the main reason why they are in support of this venture. This law entails extra complications for the claims that same sex marriages do and these are costs that can be avoided. Johnson and Johnson made a statement too supporting this view and that all lawfully married employees should be treated the same way. The…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trinidad and Tobago’s health care industry has become an immense business, as seen in the excess of Private and Public hospitals, clinics, medical centres and health centres established. Since the late 20th Century the island of Trinidad has seen the emergence of private and public hospitals in an attempt to deliver wider services to treat individuals and to become a safe haven for people to get well and live longer lives. Currently in Trinidad there are private hospitals especially along the East/West corridor, which seek to offer the initial goal of transforming individual’s lives for the better. Some of these towns along the East/West corridor are plunged with Private Hospitals which have undergone significant infrastructural expansions…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays