Nonprofit Athletes: A Case Study
Soft money is extremely vigorous and therefore candidates needs to be cautious of it. Soft money can not only make a candidate, but at the same time it can break many others during a campaign. In the section called National Committee, it is stated “…nonprofit organizations formed specifically to support particular candidates became an additional source of soft money” (352). This statement demonstrates that many organizations were creating nonprofit groups in order to take advantage of the tax-exempt benefits. One is to ask of how serious did the case of soft money become. It is stated on page three hundred and fifty-two “In 2010 the supreme court’s decision in Citizen United V. Federal Election Committee again changed the terms for campaigning”
(We the People). According to this statement, it illustrates that organizations had found a loophole into the bill and were taking advantage of it by creating multiple nonprofit organizations. Even though this sort of act can also be considered as money laundering, the only action that a court may be able to take is to reconstruct the bill in order to reinforce the law, meanwhile, trying to put a stop into organizations creating so many nonprofit groups.
(We the People). According to this statement, it illustrates that organizations had found a loophole into the bill and were taking advantage of it by creating multiple nonprofit organizations. Even though this sort of act can also be considered as money laundering, the only action that a court may be able to take is to reconstruct the bill in order to reinforce the law, meanwhile, trying to put a stop into organizations creating so many nonprofit groups.