Civil rights leader and labor union organizer, Cesar Chavez published an article in a magazine of a religious organization with a resolute tone to influence his audience of those in need to consider resisting to nonviolence. Chavez appeals to the audience's feelings, along with the use of repetition and rhetorical questioning to emphasize the importance of nonviolence and to convince those in favor of resisting to nonviolence; to keep following their beliefs and not let social circumstances depict their future. He reminds his audience the idea that “human life is a very special possession given by God to man and no one has the right to take it for any reason or for any cause..” and nonviolence ensures that.…
Violence is not something that should be taken lightly, as there are many consequences that go along with it. Cesar Chavez understands these consequences and actively tries to avoid them. Chaves, a civil rights activist, writes this article to emphasize nonviolence over violence as a modem for an authentic change. Chaves applies the "if...then" structure throughout his article to illustrate the importance of nonviolence.…
In his argument Chavez gave his audience a taste about what freedom would be like after nonviolence but he also told them what freedom is like after violence. Chavez exposed his audience to the power of nonviolence and how it can attract millions and how it is the most effective way to win a battle. He proved his point by saying “The boycott, as Gandhi taught, is the most nearly perfect instrument of nonviolent change,”(prompt) using Gandhi as an example showing his audience that nonviolence has worked in history and can work now and in the future. The nature of humans is in nonviolence and Chavez tells about how that is what it would be like after a nonviolence victory. Chavez knew that people want total freedom and he used that to his advantage to build his argument against violence and gain…
Mohandas Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Jr., and Nelson Mandela all achieved a revolution and independence in their countries through non-violence. The reason this worked is because the non-violent people would be beaten and killed for doing nothing wrong, this made the attackers look like idiots for killing defenseless people. This would make the attackers realize what they’re doing and they would grant the country independence. The documents provided could be situated into four categories: civil disobedience, self-control, willingness to accept punishment, and embracing the enemy.…
“Nonviolence means avoiding not only external physical violence but also internal violence of spirit. You not only refuse to shoot a man, but you refuse to hate him." Not always do we need to use violence to express how we feel. Anger, people tend to use violence, but I believe that communication is necessary. Communication would help everyone throughout the world.…
Peaceful action allows a community to not only highlight the injustices of society, but to create a solution to the problem. To ensure the success of a nonviolent campaign, one must consider the sources of power of the opponent and the need for unity among the protesters. For example, in her Ted Talk, “The Secret to Effective Nonviolent Protest,” Jamila Raqib employs a graphic of a block tower, representing ISIS, with each block representing a necessary component of ISIS’s power, such as skilled labor. As these blocks are removed one by one, the structure of the tower crumbles, and ultimately collapses. Raqib uses a cause-and-effect relationship to illustrate how depriving opponents of their vital resources and institutions allows protesters to attack the oppressors at their foundation to break them from the ground up.…
Malcolm X: Without violence there will be no change. If nonviolence worked I would go for it, but it…
Through nonviolence, courage displaces fear; love transforms hate. Acceptance dissipates prejudice; hope ends despair. Peace dominates war; faith reconciles doubt. Mutual regard cancels enmity. Justice for all overthrows injustice. The redemptive community supersedes systems of gross social immorality.…
African-Americans have been oppressed since their arrival in America in 1619. Due to their differences in physical characteristics, Whites considered them an inferior race and therefore treated them as property, disregarding their human rights. After many years of exploitation and abuse, in 1791, slaves on the small island of Hispaniola revolted against French rule and successfully gained their freedom in 1804. It gave hope to African American slaves who, in turn, decided to stand against their masters and gain their freedom. Every one of those rebellions was extremely violent. They were so passionate about the cause and have been oppressed for so long that they targeted anyone that was white: men, women and children. In Donn C. Worgs ““Beware of the Frustrated”: The Fantasy and Reality of African American Revolt”, the author examines African Americans’ need to use violence when it comes to revolting against their oppressors. On an opposite note, in “Civil Rights Success and the Politics of Racial Violence”, Joseph E. Luders emphasizes on the positive effects on nonviolent protests. Both authors justify these opposing strategies while making some valid points. This research paper will examine the strong arguments of both Worgs and Luders while attempting to understand how each strategy has individually shaped the mind of African Americans in today’s America.…
The history of violence in the world is well documented. However it is also possible to use non-violence to bring about change. This DBQ will look at two countries where a non-violent movement was successful. India and South Africa were two important nations on two different continents. But although they looked strong on the outside, each one suffered from a disease that threatened the health of the whole. For India, the disease was colonization. For South Africa, it was racial segregation. In each of these nations three conditions help explain why non-violence worked. The first condition was that both of them had been colonies of England. And like England both countries thought law was very powerful, more powerful even than government officials. The second condition was the presence of violence. Without the possibility of a violent revolution, the government might not have been willing to change. The third condition was the presence of a leader, Mohandas Gandhi in India and Nelson Mandela South Africa. Each of these men was so charismatic he could lead his followers to a non-violent victory. Both of them gave their lives to the cause. Gandhi was shot by an assassin while Mandela spent almost twenty-seven years of his life in prison.…
It is impossible to define the methods used when resisting a government or institution. Lenin summaries the general feeling within a country at the brink of revolution when he says ‘A revolution occurs when those on top can do more, and when those below will stand for no more.’ This statement is applicable to many of the instances over the years although the techniques and outcomes that followed varied drastically. Due to the changes in society over the many decades containing revolutions the nature of resisting has adapted in order to cause the largest impact on the government. The admiration of the French Revolutions of the 19th century led to more recent ones to model their resistance on what they know of the past. Everyday resistance, which…
Violence to non-violence can make a huge impact on social matters, because it limits the amount of chaos that can occur. The smallest things like making a small group to protest on a social issue, or even making posters to help make a difference, are very useful examples of non-violence. Hessel’s argument towards non-violence is, “It is along this path that humanity will clear its next hurdle… or say that “violence doesn’t work” is much more important than to know whether or not to condemn those who have recourse to it. In this notion of “working,” of effectiveness, lies a nonviolent hope.” Hessel believes that the past shows how violence solved nearly nothing and created a merely violent world, therefore it is our turn to show our non-violent actions and solutions to making a difference. The younger generation shows their non-violent side through volunteer work, and creating small organization to make changes in their community. It may not seem as powerful as what the older generation was used to, but it is a step forward. Even though nonviolence is a great solution, violence may still occur, because it takes one person to make chaos. It’s okay for violence to happen when its make your words be known, for example the civil rights movement and the women’s suffrage movement. They were violent movements that made a huge difference,…
How would you have felt if you were born back in time during discrimination and the civil rights movement? Many people’s rights were diminished throughout history. However, people such as the civil rights activist fought for their and future generations rights. Civil rights activist had a sole method throughout their fight against discrimination, and that is the use of nonviolence. Furthermore, in order for civil rights activist to achieve their goal, they used certain paths such as the purpose of nonviolence, nonviolence strategies, and the “Six Principles of Nonviolence.”…
The method of using Non-violent peaceful resistance along with the method of employing violence in the form of self-defense were both strategies used in the fight for Civil Rights from 1954-1977 during the Civil Rights Movement and the Black Power Movement. Some people supported the use of violence if necessary while others supported the use of nonviolent resistant. Both factions gained considerable ground alone and together. The decision on what method to use should depend on the situation at hand. Violence even in the form of self-defense should still be the last resort.…
As shown throughout history, individual forms of resistance cannot change many things. By having more than one forms of resistance come together, economic, political, and moral pressure can be imposed upon the oppressor in bringing about a change to current conditions that oppress the resistors. With courage and self-respect in defending their rights, the oppressed can curb injustices imposed in them by…