Preview

nora and krogstad in comparison

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3622 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
nora and krogstad in comparison
Samuel Taylor Coleridge in Contrast to William Wordsworth
Samuel Taylor Coleridge is often discussed in association with his peer, William Wordsworth. This is due in part to their friendship and joint ventures on works such as Lyrical Ballads. Although he is often “paired” with his counterpart Wordsworth, there are several differences in Coleridge’s poetic style and philosophical views. Coleridge’s poetry differs from that of Wordsworth, and his association with Wordsworth overshadows Coleridge’s individual accomplishments as a Romantic poet. In addition, Coleridge’s poetry complicates experiences that Wordsworth views as very simple and very commonplace. Samuel Taylor Coleridge has a poetic diction unlike that of William Wordsworth, he relies more heavily on imagination for poetic inspiration, and he also incorporates religion into his poetry differently. Coleridge’s different views, combined with his opium addiction, led to an eventual breach in his friendship with Wordsworth – a friendship that had begun in 1797.

Although Coleridge and Wordsworth did not meet until the year 1797, they were familiar with one another’s work prior to that date. As early as 1793 Coleridge had read the poetry of Wordsworth, and he was specifically drawn to the political elements of his poem Descriptive Sketches. Their first meeting occurred in 1795 atBristol during a political debate. Not much is documented about Wordsworth’s first impressions of Coleridge, but upon meeting him in 1795 he’s recorded as mentioning, “I wished indeed to see more [of Coleridge]- his talent appears to me very great” (Newlyn, 5). Their friendship truly began to flourish when Coleridge visited Wordsworth in March of 1797 at Racedown, and after that visit the two had a much closer relationship and communicated with one another regularly.

Despite any difference, the two poets were compatible because they were both “preoccupied with imagination, and both [used] verbal reference in new



Bibliography: Clarendon Press;New York:OxfordUniversityPress, 1986. Princeton,NJ:PrincetonUniversityPress, 1988. London: Hogarth Press, 1989. 4. Barfield, Owen. What Coleridge Thought. London:OxfordUniversity Press, 1972. 5. Holmes, Richard. Coleridge: Darker Reflections. New York: Pantheon, 1999. 6. Romanticism: An Anthology. Malden,MA: Blackwell Publishers, 1998.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful