Preview

Notes on "Right and Wrong" by Nagel

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
420 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Notes on "Right and Wrong" by Nagel
Notes on “Right and Wrong”
First, plenty of people who don't believe in God still make judgments of right and wrong, and think no one should kill another for his wallet even if he can be sure to get away with it. Second, if God exists, and forbids what's wrong, that still isn't what makes it wrong. Murder is wrong in itself, and that's why God forbids it (if He does.) God couldn't make just any old thing wrong-like putting on your left sock before you’re right-simply by prohibiting it. If God would punish you for doing that it would be inadvisable to do it, but it wouldn't be wrong. Third, fear of punishment and hope of reward, and even love of God, seem not to be the right motives for morality. If you think it's wrong to kill, cheat, or steal, you should want to avoid doing such things because they are bad things to do to the victims, not just because you fear the consequences for yourself, or because you don't want to offend your Creator.

* His family and friends, those he specially cares about. Of course he will care more about certain people, and also about himself. But he has some reason to consider the effect of what he does on the good or harm of everyone. If he's like most of us, that is what he thinks others should do with regard to him, even if they aren't friends of his. * How we should consider the interests of others, or how we should weigh them against the special interest we all have in ourselves and the particular people close to us. It doesn't even tell us how much we should care about people in other countries in comparison with our fellow citizens * For instance: should you care about every other person as much as you care about yourself? Should you in other words love your neighbor as yourself (even if he isn't your neighbor)? Should you ask yourself, every time you go to a movie, whether the cost of the ticket could provide more happiness if you gave it to someone else, or donated the money to famine relief? Very few people are

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    There is no doubt there are egotistical, self-absorbed people in today’s society. Their personal choices are made through the idea of benefiting just themselves. Now, there are charitable individuals in this world that drive, not just themselves, but everyone around them to a happier state in life, even if that means making sacrifices. Sacrifice is the ability to give up something with the intention of it resulting for the greater good. If everyone in this world conducts sacrifices on the daily, there would eventually be nothing to sacrifice for. Unfortunately, that would never happen, prompting more people, like my parents, to make all these sacrifices.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ap Euro: Mchapter 26 Outline

    • 8194 Words
    • 33 Pages

    * For others, violence of war became a starting point for violence in political movements in 1920s-1930s…

    • 8194 Words
    • 33 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another issue with any divine command morality theory is that we have no confirmation that there even is the essential God, a great deal less which God's commands are the commands of that God. There are many distinctive moral frameworks credited to God. This is so even inside of the umbrella of Christian belief in a higher power; more so when we consider different belief…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eth 316 Week One Essay

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The utilitarianism theory of ethics focuses on weighing options for actions and the choice made depends on the course of action that has the best consequences for the individual. This approach gives little consideration to the morals as long as the outcome benefits one’s self, even at the expense of some individuals. Morality issues receive consideration if the action taken is a moral one. For example, a person may not personally believe in war, but a soldier will serve when called because he or she believes in serving his or her country (Encyclopedia Britannica, 2011).…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [ 4 ]. A quote form Bermans book on views of how we overlook the common good…

    • 1460 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gilbert Grape

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages

    He doesn’t see what’s best for him or he doesn’t care. And I think it’s quite noble to do so, think of others be for himself. But I also think it’s important to do things for one self.…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Believing in a spiritual entity or a supernatural supreme being can play a role in one’s moral beliefs, but it is not necessary. The argument will start with breaking down what it is to be moral with the definition of moral, which is “of or relating to principles of right and wrong in behavior,” (ethically speaking) “conforming to a standard of right behavior.” (Merriam-Webster, 2011) With that in mind now, one can be moral and not believe in GOD, because it is up to the person to choose to be moral, hence “To be, or not to be…” This argument will consist of a brief history in a few religions, church and state, moral education, ethics, and Plato 's and Aristotle 's take on living morally. Again, believing in God is not necessarily needed for one to be moral; all that is needed is good ethics, belief in oneself, and knowledge.…

    • 2355 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    To learn from ones mistakes, one must take the consequences that come with the mistake made and not have someone protect us. We see this through the eyes of George and Lennie in John Steinbecks Of Men and Mice. Lennie, one of the main characters, is protected by George his best friend. In Of Mice and Men George does not give Lennie room to grow as a person, thus protecting Lennie. Humans in General should not care about the welfare of other because it does not give the person room to grow and to learn from there mistake.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As stated in the Divine Command Theory (DCT) of Moral Wrongness, an act is wrong if and only if it violates a command of God. However, there are many oppositions to this theory, the most famous being the Euthyphro problem. The Euthyphro problem is known as a dilemma argument, meaning the structure is set up as follows; either God’s commands are arbitrary or God’s commands are based simply on his knowledge of right and wrong. This dilemma argument is formulated in such a way that if you believe either statement and its following conclusion to be true, the DCT is then inherently false. For example, if the former is true, then God has no moral authority and if the latter is true, morality is independent of God, both cases dispelling the theory.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Vietnam War Selfishness

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page

    I would have to admit that humans are selfish creatures in general. My reasoning is that in the most intense of situations, most humans will choose to save themselves over anyone else. For example, during the Vietnam War many Americans were unable to fully sympathize with the South Vietnamese and constantly called for the withdrawal of American troops until that request was fulfilled. While I understand the outcry to stop the number of American deaths in Vietnam, I also sympathize with South Vietnamese were under the threat of being overtaken and forced into communism or even genocide. The selfishness of Americans during this time was obvious. The American people pleaded for the President to pull out of Vietnam while knowing the fate of the…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The principle of humanity should be based on concepts which are pure and should apply to all. The rational ideas that are followed by all should appeal to all individuals and it would not be possible if these ideas are driven by experiences.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should it be applicable to the problems and situations that we as Americans must deal with in today's society?…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nagel’s subjectivity argument appears fairly straight-forward – Nagel asserts that there is a unique and subjective component of consciousness, and this component defeats any attempt to define consciousness in objective terms. Nagel believes that it is impossible to fully understand consciousness without the subjective experience. Intentional states cannot explain a subjective experience; therefore, the only to understand consciousness using reductionist theory would be to remove the subjective component – this would obviously be illogical. Nagel concludes that consciousness cannot be explained by reductionists. Physicalism also fails to explain consciousness due to the subjective component.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mankind Is Our Business

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages

    "It takes a village to raise a child", a famous quote with much more truth in it than may be realized. As a person, being part of a family, community, and country in the world is so mandatory for survival, that not making mankind part of our business is not an option.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because you equally value rationality and sensibility, along with autonomy, you tend to assume that each person operates from a clear sense of their own values, as you do.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays