Nuclear power has been a reliable source of green energy for nearly 60 years and has shown itself to be a practical green alternative when others have proven to be impractical. Nuclear power plants have a lower ecological footprint in comparison to traditional forms of power generation primarily because they do not produce any form of greenhouse gasses during the reaction process and their only emission is water vapor. Nuclear energy’s impact on the environment at the mining end of the process is minimal because of the small amount of Uranium actually being mined and only second to Uranium collected from metals like copper, closed underground mines are the most common source of Uranium which makes up 30% of the total Uranium mined. One argument against Nuclear reactors is that they naturally leak and increase global radioactivity levels. Reactors do leak but it is best to put this kind of information into proper context. Normal operation releases into the environment total up to 0.0002 mSv per year as the global average, but when compared to the natural background radiation which is currently at a global average of 2.4 mSv/a, and can vary anywhere from 1 mSv/a to 13 mSv/a, so 0.0002 mSv is a rather insignificant amount in the grand scheme of things.
Thermo Nuclear power generation has a significant advantage over other forms of power generation because of Uranium’s extremely high energy density allowing for increased production of electricity at a lower cost. The high efficiency of nuclear power reduces the operational costs and the need for a constant feed of resources eliminating the need for massive stock piles or a direct connection to a fuel source. The high efficiency of nuclear power requires less fuel for operation and throughout the world there is only about 54,610 tons of uranium mined2 each year which is only a fraction of the 68 million Tonnes of coal that is mined each year in Canada alone and Canada is only the 14th largest coal producing country. Uranium-235 the most common type of Uranium used in reactors has an energy density of 83 140 000 MJ per Kg vs. Coal which has an energy density of 47 MJ per Kg which gives Nuclear power over 1.7 million times the energy generation capability while consuming the same amount resources. One Kg of Uranium-235 can theoretically produce 80 TJ of energy if complete fission is achieved which is equivalent to approximately 3000 Tonnes of coal.
Spent Nuclear fuel has always been somewhat of a problem and always at the top of the list of public concerns. Nuclear waste has been thought of as the ultimate form of pollution by many people, a type of pollution that never truly goes away but many people do not understand what nuclear waste or radiation really is. People don’t realize that they are being eradiated at all times throughout their entire lives and they are receiving anywhere between 1 mSv/a to 13 mSv/a of background radiation at any given time depending on their location in the world.3 Spent Nuclear fuel is easily stored in dry storage casks and heavy water pools which are located on site at many Nuclear facilities. Once spent fuel rods have spent a minimum of 1 year in a heavy water pool they can be placed in dry cask storage units which can be kept on site without the risk of radiation leaks. Breeder reactors have recently come into the eyes of the nuclear community because they have the capability to reuse spent fuel from conventional reactors. Reused fuel in breeder reactors will be able to produce 100 times more energy than conventional light water reactors.9 Breeder reactors combined with seawater Uranium extraction will be able to supply power at the current rates for about 5 billion years making Nuclear as sustainable as wind or solar energy. Reusing fuel in breeder reactors reduces the half-life of the depleted uranium to about 300 years by removing actinides this will allow for a more rapid turnover of nuclear waste and there will be no longer any need for permanent storage of waste materials virtually eliminating nuclear energy’s main problem.
Nuclear power generation is by far the best form of power generation and with proper public education on the subject it would most likely become the main source of power around the world. Power generation has been producing power for nearly 60 years without any operational emissions proving its reliability and effectiveness as a green energy source. There is no other source of power generation that can produce a comparable amount of electricity or reach the high levels of resource efficiency Nuclear power has achieved while still being a green energy source. Nuclear waste has been most people’s red flag when talking about Nuclear energy but with advanced Breeder reactors that waste can be reused and reduced with a significantly shorted half-life. Nuclear energy has been the unrecognized green energy source with massive untapped potential and with current and future advancements in efficiency, and safety people may realize the true potential of nuclear to meet the worlds demand for reliable clean energy.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Many people around the world ask themselves what are the disadvantages of adopting an alternative solution to solve the consumption of global nuclear energy? Based on what we have experienced through events with major disasters and the aftermath of many casualties, it has summed up to result in having failures outgrowing expectations. Therefore, global nuclear power usage is to be opposed due to the fact that it comes with high financial costs, nuclear waste management complications, and the fact that thousands in populations are mass numbers of casualties.…
- 530 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
First off all, what is the nuclear? Many countries use nuclear energy to generate electricity. “Unclear is the energy stored in the center or the nucleus of an atom. After we bombard the nucleus into two parts, two different elements are formed along with the emission of high energy. The process generally followed is called fission. Fission is the chain reaction which needs uranium-235.”(“Fission and fusion”)The nuclear energy is considered as the worthiest alternative resource of energy after fossil fuels, but it also has a lot of potential problems.”(“Nuclear Energy”)…
- 394 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Nuclear power does not put out green house gasses, nuclear power does not pollute our water, and unlike some people believe nuclear power does not release toxic gasses into the air. Some people believe that it produces toxic gases into the air because they see the white clouds that come out of the top of the power plant cooling towers, but in fact those white clouds are actually just the water vapor that has been used to cool the systems, it is not toxic and therefore does not pollute the air. Nuclear energy uses either plutonium or uranium, depending on the type of the reactor. Nuclear reactors produce less waste than any other type of energy source. One pound of plutonium can produce the same amount of energy as 50,000 barrels of oil. The number of deaths caused by coal powered plants is about 24,000 a year. There were only 56 direct deaths caused by the Chernobyl reactor meltdown. Fukushima had no direct deaths, and the only other reported deaths were of the 3 men who were testing a portable reactor in Arco, Idaho. Arco was also the very first city in the world to be powered by nuclear…
- 791 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Edgar Allan Poe was an English author who was active during the 19th century. Edgar Allan Poe had specialized in the writing of tales which had incorporated a variety of themes such as horror, suspense, poetry, and mystery. Edgar Allen Poe had written a countless amount of novels, short stories, essays, and poetry over the course of his short-lived lifespan. He had written much literary fiction such as The Fall of the House of Usher, The Raven, Annabel Lee, The Tell-Tale Heart, To Helen, The Masque of the Red Death, and much more. I know his life was filled with much torment and pain, that he was an alcoholic, and that he had married his 13 year old cousin. One thing I did not know about Edgar Allan Poe is that he was the first author to try…
- 168 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The initial construction cost of nuclear power plants is large. On top of this, when the power plants first have been built, people are left with the cost to enrich and process the nuclear fuel which also costs a lot of money. How much? Apply concrete details from your research (and cite it). Just think of how nuclear is wasteful too conversational 8 not only that but the people who work there at the plant. Nuclear energy is very costly. Generation electricity in nuclear reactors is cheaper than electricity generating from oil, gas, coal and not to talk of the renewable energy source 1 cite. Even though coal pollutes big time doesn’t mean it’s not double negative bad. Coal produces carbon dioxide which we 9 human produce as well. By using coal, it provides just what we need without paying overtime on building one of nuclear buildings which cost way more than a Coal factory.…
- 720 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
No new nuclear power plants should be built because the increasing energy demand in the United States can be met with less negative environmental impact with power generated by renewable sources such as wind, solar, and tidal power. The “zero emissions” benefit of nuclear energy is a common misconception. The actual reaction in a nuclear power plant only creates steam and radioactive waste; it does not produce greenhouse gasses or particulate matter that the combustion of fossil fuels creates. But, due to reliance on existing fossil-fuel power for plant construction, decommissioning, and fuel processing as well as the mining, enrichment, and transport of uranium, the nuclear…
- 2071 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Many professors, scientists, researchers, and even governments, have been debating over the issue on the use of nuclear power as a main energy source. In Taking Sides, two authors who are highly narrow-minded state their debates on this critical issue. Allison MacFarlane, author of “Nuclear Power: Panacea for Future Energy Needs?”, believes that nuclear power should be revived. She argues that nuclear power will provide sufficient energy, while at the same time reducing carbon dioxide emissions. On the other hand, professor Kristin Shrader-Frechette, author of “Five Myths About Nuclear Energy”, argues that nuclear power is too expensive and unsafe for the environment, when there are renewable energy sources that are better for the environment and economy. I agree with Shrader-Frechette because she proves the five myths about nuclear energy wrong using extremely valid arguments, which exist to prove that nuclear power is not the best option for an energy source in our society.…
- 1389 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Nuclear Power Greenpeace argues that there is nothing ‘peaceful’ about the nuclear industry. It is harmful to the environment as well as all living creatures. The Nuclear Age began in 1945 and ever since Greenpeace began, they have been trying to fight it. There has been much progress made. In 2000 nuclear powerful was discredited during the UN Climate Change talks. In 2001 the UN Sustainability Development Conference declared nuclear as an unsustainable technology.…
- 151 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The good things about nuclear energy start with the environmental benefits. If done right, nuclear power will emit less than one one-hundredth of the green house gasses than coal or gas power. Coal and oil plants emit large amounts of CO2, which is proven to cause global warming, while nuclear energy creates no CO2 emissions. Compared to coal, natural gas, wind, and solar power, nuclear energy per kWh (kilowatt-hour) is the cheapest to produce. Although the running cost of nuclear power plants is already low, we are striving to lower the cost further by using new technology and by trying to better understand how nuclear energy works.…
- 688 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The question of whether the U.S. should have nuclear power plants is very controversial. There are two sides that one can take; however, both sides have their own share of problems. If you chose to not have nuclear plants, then eventually all natural resources will run out. The oil supply will run out relatively soon, and all other sources will run out too. The natural resources that we have now are still harmful to the earth however. The gas which we use for our cars pollutes the air and considering the amount of cars the are driven each day, it is ripping apart the o-zone layer. However, if the U.S. does decide to use nuclear plants, then there is a great danger of toxic waste invading our rivers, and also the chance of a spill similar to Chernobyl. As we saw in the Chernobyl video, there is great danger when using nuclear energy. If this were to happen is the United States, the risk of mortality is much higher because the area's in which there would be a plant such as a big city are very densely populated. Because of these facts, I do not think that the U.S. should renew its efforts to develop more nuclear plants.…
- 437 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
During the last century, nuclear power has been established as a reliable source of energy in the major industrialized countries. Nuclear power plants provide about 17 percent of the world's electricity. In the United States, nuclear power supplies about 15 percent of the electricity overall. Although no new plants are scheduled to be built in the United States, nuclear power is growing to be a popular producer of power. It has recently enjoyed a revival in attention and research due to the environmental concerns surrounding current conventional energy sources. Issues of regulation and safety are at the forefront of all discussions involving nuclear power. (Lillington) One of the major concerns is the radioactive waste that is produced during the fission of uranium.…
- 2468 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Nuclear Power is reliable yet controversial source of energy in the U.S. Many people have different viewpoints on Nuclear energy. Although nuclear energy can cause many problems such as nuclear accidents, it saves money, produces less pollution, and it can be made in any environment. The benefits of nuclear energy outweigh the risks. Without nuclear energy we would be relying on the weather for energy.…
- 347 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
By building nuclear reactors which contains the nuclei, the large of energy released from it creates steam which drives machines to generate electric power. Nuclear energy is capable of producing energy equivalent to 3 million pounds of coal from 1 pound of uranium. however, after the nuclear plant disasters that happened in Chernobyl in Ukraine and Fukushima in Japan led people to a controversy on nuclear energy and questions such as whether nuclear energy and reactors can solve the world’s energy issues or does it pose to much of a risk and should be taken out as a choice of energy. After looking through the issue more, I have came up with the question: To what extent do the benefits of nuclear energy outweigh the possible risks it has on the environment? After doing research, my position in this controversy is pro nuclear. I believe that the benefits of nuclear energy are higher than the threats and after looking at statistics, it had shown that other sources of energy causes the same or more damage to our environment with less good…
- 791 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Burger King, often abbreviated as BK, is a global chain of hamburger fast food restaurants headquartered in unincorporated Miami-Dade County, Florida, United States. The company began in 1953 as Insta-Burger King, a Jacksonville, Florida-based restaurant chain. After Insta-Burger King ran into financial difficulties in 1954, its two Miami-based franchisees, David Edgerton and James McLamore, purchased the company and renamed it Burger King. Over the next half century, the company would change hands four times, with its third set of owners, a partnership of TPG Capital, Bain Capital, and Goldman Sachs Capital Partners, taking it public in 2002. In late 2010, 3G Capital of Brazil acquired a majority stake in BK in a deal valued at US$3.26 billion. The new owners promptly initiated a restructuring of the company to reverse its fortunes.…
- 700 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
PTV news aims to be service focused (Lovelock, 2005) in its strategy. Its news channel offers a narrow range of services/programs such as news bulletins, talk shows, documentaries and live events update etc. The market to which the services are offered are broad and diverse, however mostly the adults and people from an older age bracket make PTV a preference.…
- 1471 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays