Preview

Nuclear Power Plant Reaction Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
524 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nuclear Power Plant Reaction Paper
Regina May P. Hinagdanan 10-SCB
Physics Reaction Paper
Is nuclear power plant really that dangerous? It is true that many people have varying opinions about having nuclear power plants and developing nuclear energy. I, myself, see it as a good alternative source of energy while my brother sees it as a weapon for mass destruction. Nowadays, people are easily swayed by the reports of the media. Indeed, most of them are true but some of them tend to be a bit exaggerated. The article pointed out 3 fallacies the media directly or indirectly caused. The first fallacy mentioned is “Nuclear energy is not safe”. First of all, the energy itself IS safe. I believe that all nuclear power plants are built and designed in such a way that the people are protected from harm or radiation. The building itself has precautionary measures like cooling systems which avoids overheating and explosion. The government would not have agreed to nuclear power plants if they pose a great threat to the people. The second fallacy pointed out is “Working at or living near a nuclear power plant can cause cancer”. I, too, am a believer of this until I read the article. It is clearly stated through studies and surveys that there was no increased incidence of cancer mortality working or living near nuclear power plants. Again, nuclear power plants are built in a way that the general public and workers are protected from any harm. The workers follow precautions like wearing body suits too. It is only through direct radiation exposure that people may be affected. The last fallacy, “Nuclear power plants can explode like a bomb”. Very different to what we usually see in movies, nuclear power plants do not explode like a nuclear bomb. With the exception of the Chernobyl Incident, it neither has the capabilities nor the requirements to blow up like a bomb. The Chernobyl accident in 1986 was the result of a flawed reactor design that was operated with inadequately trained personnel. The

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    applebaum rhetoric essay

    • 841 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout her entire article, Applebaum passes excessively opinionated statements off as facts. She describes Japan as “the only country in the world to have experienced true nuclear catastrophe”, giving the Japanese more of an incentive to build a safer nuclear plant. Applebaum completely disregards all other nuclear disasters to devastate the world, like Chernobyl, which took the lives of an estimated 40,000 people. When compared to the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant’s damage, resulting in no immediate deaths, Applebaum’s claim is reduced to a disgusting overstatement. This is because it ignores a horrible event, caused by an actual malfunction in a nuclear power system that killed thousands of people and lead to the displacement of many more due to radiation levels, yet offers the utmost concern for the nuclear aftermath of a natural disaster that killed zero people. The earthquake in Japan was a tragedy, however Japan cannot be considered the pioneers of nuclear disaster. Applebaum also, at times, contradicts herself. Earlier in her article, Applebaum claims that Japan was “…the only country in the world to have experienced true nuclear catastrophe…” she later counteracts this when she states that “If there…

    • 841 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    labouring the Walmart way

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    First off all, what is the nuclear? Many countries use nuclear energy to generate electricity. “Unclear is the energy stored in the center or the nucleus of an atom. After we bombard the nucleus into two parts, two different elements are formed along with the emission of high energy. The process generally followed is called fission. Fission is the chain reaction which needs uranium-235.”(“Fission and fusion”)The nuclear energy is considered as the worthiest alternative resource of energy after fossil fuels, but it also has a lot of potential problems.”(“Nuclear Energy”)…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear power plants do not release harmful carbon dioxide into the environment like the fossil fuels that are mostly used. Therefore, it can actually help with the problem of global warming around the world and even here. Nuclear power plants are also considered more reliable since they do not depend on the wind or the sun in order to produce energy. This means that nuclear energy can provide a more reliable base load of energy even when the demand for energy is very high like during the summer months when everyone is using their air conditioners.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear energy is one of the hottest topics in the fight to a cleaner world. The number of people who believe that nuclear energy is too dangerous and unhealthy for the earth has skyrocketed because of the nuclear accidents that have happened in the past and recently. These protesters may have a lot of evidence and theories about how bad this type of energy can be, but the people who have realized that nuclear energy is the way to a cleaner and more “Green” society have proof and facts that overrule anything that the protesters say.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Humans have always tried to find innovative, powerful and valid energy sources in order to be able to supply the several needs of modern societies. In this sense, nuclear power is considered one of the most controversial technologies related to the new millennium.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lat1 Task 2

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to McGovern, there are numerous health risks connected to nuclear energy and the exposure of human cells to its radiations. This is a critical aspect in the context of health and other provisions regarding this article. The entire paper discusses more on the aspects of technology and its devastating effects on health. It is vital to agree that technology has revolutionized the entire sectors of economy, health, and social aspects; nonetheless, nuclear energy has impacts that cannot be contained in the health contexts. Numerous strategies are required in order to curb the menace even there is need to embrace such technologies. This article takes a look at the health risks related to the use of nuclear energy and the importance of understanding these risks. This article acknowledges the fact that nuclear energy may have both positive and negative impacts on individual’s health. However, the only positive impact on health which is highlighted in this article is the fact that nuclear energy can be used to produce electricity which is important in maintaining and developing economies (McGovern M. H. and Tiwari J. (2009). the article acknowledges the fact that the positive impacts of nuclear technology may be dwarfed and become insignificant by the extent of the negatives associated with nuclear energy. the radiological and non-radiological risks posed with nuclear mishaps or misuse of nuclear facilities is also discussed. according to the article, the dangers of exposure to high dosages to radiation is illustrated using the Chernobyl nuclear disaster in 1986 (McGovern & Tiwari, 2009).…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many professors, scientists, researchers, and even governments, have been debating over the issue on the use of nuclear power as a main energy source. In Taking Sides, two authors who are highly narrow-minded state their debates on this critical issue. Allison MacFarlane, author of “Nuclear Power: Panacea for Future Energy Needs?”, believes that nuclear power should be revived. She argues that nuclear power will provide sufficient energy, while at the same time reducing carbon dioxide emissions. On the other hand, professor Kristin Shrader-Frechette, author of “Five Myths About Nuclear Energy”, argues that nuclear power is too expensive and unsafe for the environment, when there are renewable energy sources that are better for the environment and economy. I agree with Shrader-Frechette because she proves the five myths about nuclear energy wrong using extremely valid arguments, which exist to prove that nuclear power is not the best option for an energy source in our society.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear Power may be atmospheric friendly, but it is capable of causing extensive harm on any living organism. One of the worst nuclear power accidents happened in the United States on March 28, 1979. The accident occurred at 4:00 a.m. at the Three Mile Island 2 Nuclear Power Plant in Pennsylvania. Three Mile Island has two power plants and together they supplied about 300,000 homes with electricity. The accident started out as a mechanical malfunction, but was intensified by human errors. It was because of this accident that the President’s Commission was established. Power plants are supposed to execute a very basic function, to heat water. The hot water produces into steam and a turbine is operated by the steam. The turbine then turns the…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The good things about nuclear energy start with the environmental benefits. If done right, nuclear power will emit less than one one-hundredth of the green house gasses than coal or gas power. Coal and oil plants emit large amounts of CO2, which is proven to cause global warming, while nuclear energy creates no CO2 emissions. Compared to coal, natural gas, wind, and solar power, nuclear energy per kWh (kilowatt-hour) is the cheapest to produce. Although the running cost of nuclear power plants is already low, we are striving to lower the cost further by using new technology and by trying to better understand how nuclear energy works.…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After the Chernobyl disaster of April 26th, 1986, it was often said that the nuclear industry no longer had the resilience to survive another major nuclear accident. The industry hoped that the sentiment behind the Chernobyl accident could be eased on the basis that it was the consequence of a flaw in design that was unique to the Soviet Union’s reactors and that they had been operated in such a way that would not have been acceptable in the West. Then, Fukushima changed everything. That, at least, was the popular view adopted in the aftermath of March 11, 2011, by the press, media and across the Internet blogging community. A nuclear accident in such a densely populated and well-developed country would transform the way nuclear energy is perceived, as well as, determine the way it would be used, or not used, in the years to come. This analysis attempts to overview its causes, evaluate its impact, and understand its consequences on future nuclear development.…

    • 3083 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nuclear Power Plants

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The question of whether the U.S. should have nuclear power plants is very controversial. There are two sides that one can take; however, both sides have their own share of problems. If you chose to not have nuclear plants, then eventually all natural resources will run out. The oil supply will run out relatively soon, and all other sources will run out too. The natural resources that we have now are still harmful to the earth however. The gas which we use for our cars pollutes the air and considering the amount of cars the are driven each day, it is ripping apart the o-zone layer. However, if the U.S. does decide to use nuclear plants, then there is a great danger of toxic waste invading our rivers, and also the chance of a spill similar to Chernobyl. As we saw in the Chernobyl video, there is great danger when using nuclear energy. If this were to happen is the United States, the risk of mortality is much higher because the area's in which there would be a plant such as a big city are very densely populated. Because of these facts, I do not think that the U.S. should renew its efforts to develop more nuclear plants.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article starts off by recounting the natural disasters that took place in Japan a week before the article was written. She believes that thanks to the Japanese peoples' calmness and composure after these events, that the nation will eventually recover, but one of the nuclear power complexes will not. The nuclear complex, due to damage from the natural disasters, is now at risk of a catastrophe. This brings up the question that if the Japanese can't build a safe nuclear reactor, then who can? She continues to talk about how nuclear power is promoted because it is safe and the chances of disaster are one in a…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Energy Exploration

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Nuclear energy can be very dangerous but can also be cleaner than other energy sources by creating less pollution than fossil fuels. It is an advanced form of energy that has only been available for the past 50 years. It is very similar to fossil fuel in that it uses steam turbines to produce electricity. It uses uranium to produce heat in a process called nuclear fission where neutrons are smashed into the nucleus of atoms splitting them and releasing heat energy.…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Along with the advantages of nuclear power, there are also some disadvantages, which we must consider. These may have a very negative effect on our future and other generations to come.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We live in an era of untold gasoline prices and frequent political dialogue about finding and using alternative forms of energy. Some of these alternative energy sources that are being bantered about and, in some places, implemented include solar, wind, and hydroelectric power. The majority of Americans would agree that all of these forms of alternative energy are safe and should be pursued as new means of powering the country. However, there is one well-known energy source that stirs up dissent and division among the country’s citizens: nuclear power.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays