nuclear weapon

IntroduceThough after the second World War some countries have revised their nuclear weapons programme, nuclear weapons still today are considered to be an established currency of politics and security. While the nuclear weapons states have agreed on a legally binding commitment to nuclear disarmament, they continue to rely heavily on such weapons in their security doctrines and continue to invest and modernise their arsenals. The way towards nuclear disarmament has many different paths and there are several approaches.
One such approach that is gaining more and more support is the delegitimisation of nuclear weapons. To delegitimise something means to “diminish or destroy the legitimacy, prestige or authority”1/ of a given idea, concept or object.
In their advisory opinion in July 1996 the International Court of Justice stated that “the threat or use of nuclear weapons would generally be contrary to the rules of international law applicable in armed conflict, and in particular the principles and rules humanitarian law”. Since the use of nuclear weapons is generally considered to be illegal, their overall utility is questionable. So in order to delegitimise nuclear weapons, there is a critical need to change the perception of their role and utility: from a position in which they occupied a central strategic place to one in which their role is seen as wholly unnecessary as well as undesirable. To be successful in this task other actors that are not bound to a specific state’s security polices are of utmost importance, they can bring new ideas to the table and keep the discussion focused on the topic at hand. It all comes down to nuclear weapons not being very useful in today’s world and the upholding of these weapons increasing the danger of them being used and thus causing devastation.
PointIf we were to abolish all of our nuclear programs it only takes one rouge country like North Korea or Pakistan to launch some at us and eliminate us or any other country. Also once we would disarm them other countries like China and Russia would be watching us closer than ever before. If even 1 is launched at us we are screwed. We need to defend the world.- Why? Just Why? Because it will bring less harm to innocent people? No. If America gets rid of nuclear bombs what would then stop North Korea and Kim-Jong Un from taking over the whole entire world? The answer is nothing. Without nukes in countries such as the U.S. How would we be able to defend the people of our country? Simple - Its very simlpe, its the same as taking away firearms. if you abolish nuclear weapons only the bad guys will have them. and no country in the world could take on the us or russia. its to much money and time to dismantle every nuke in the world. keep them. No matter what we do - , they'll always be around Now that we have the technology for nuclear weapons even if we "abolish them" people will still be able to get their hands o them. Scientists and engineers will be kidnapped and sold to the highest bidder for countries to have nukes, and if we don't have the deterrent of mutually assured destruction then that will cause nuclear war Not a chance! We shouldn't! - We got understand that the world is never going to be a peaceful place. The world is only going to get worse. More wars are going to break out and we have to understand that the worlds going to end soon. God specifically states in the book of revelations that "nation will rise up against nation." So we need to stop dreaming like the world has a chance to be peaceful, because it is not heading that way and never will. We're all in the end times here, it's only a matter of time until the real war breaks out between the world. And that is what God specifically is trying to tell us in the book of revelations. Peace by balance of terror.- Logical thinking capability, not idealism, should come to a conclusion of the deterrence effect of a nuclear arms race is the only way to ensure world peace. If human nature was perfect in all possible aspects than we won't need weapons in the first place. But, since we do have weapons and do have imperfect minds, a physical threat is the only way to thwart the human mind from malfunctioning.