Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Nuclear Weapons Outline

Satisfactory Essays
330 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Nuclear Weapons Outline
Name: Kutbeddin
Surname: Ağca
Student ID: 100307116
Department: Architecture

Topic: Nuclear Weapons

Research Paper Outline

I.Introduction: Do we need nuclear weapons? Even though nuclear weapons give us advantages there are much more dangerous things than advantages such as a lot of people die when used, contries argue with each other because of these and there is evidence of radiation explosure.
II.Topic Sentence: A lot of people die. A.We shouldn’t use these weapons even at war because not only soldiers but also civilians are affected by them. 1.ABD used nuclear weapons to destroy Hiroshima and Nagasaki in World War II.
III. Topic Sentence: Country argue with each other because of nuclear weapons. A.Having neighbour who has nuclear weapons means threat for your country. 1.Nowadays Turkey and Azerbaijan argue with Armenia because of metsamar nuclear power station.
IV. Topic Sentence: There is evidence of radiation explosure. A.Need nuclear power station for make nuclear weapons and nuclear power stations are very dangereous for the area. 1.Russia wants to built a nuclear power station in Mersin in Akkuyu, but environmental organizations are trying to stop it.
V.Conclusion: Having nuclear weapons means somewhere or someone will be damaged. The M.A.D. doctrine prevented any kind of nuclear war between countries. If nuclear weapons cant be used, why have them?

Do we need nuclear weapons? Having nuclear weapons provides advantages. This advantages are dangerous for other countries. Also they damage themselves because of nuclear weapons. Because nuclear weapon damage not only humans but also the World is affected by them. If nuclear weapons use, maybe not today but in the future they, who used it, will be affected by them. Even though nuclear weapon give us advantages there are much more dangerous things than advantages such as a lot of people die, contries argue each other because of these and there is evidence of radiation exposure. When use nuclear weapons a lot of people die.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    U.S World History 05.06

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Despite the fall of the Soviet Union 19 years ago in 1991, the issue of nuclear arms, besides terrorism, remains one of the chief security concerns in the contemporary world. Accordingly, the following issues concerning nuclear arms remained unresolved security concerns.Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. These events not only brought about the surrender of the Japan and an end to World War II, but they also helped shaped the nature of international politics for the next six decades.The atomic bomb is the crudest form of a series of powerful nuclear weapons to be eventually developed and come into existence. Both superpowers, the United States of America and the Soviet Union, eventually built massive stockpiles of nuclear weapons during the Cold War. This escalation of nuclear arms possession led to…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article, “The Day the Bomb Went Off,” Knoll and Postol argue nuclear bombs are catastrophic. The event of a nuclear attack would send humans back to the stone age, and put a halt on any technological advances. Furthermore, the effects of radiation would harm the population within a broad radius of a nuclear explosion. Readers may wonder what America would do under nuclear attack, and draw the conclusion nuclear bombs would destroy everything our society has accomplished.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    I clearly recognize that defensive systems have limitations and raise certain problems and ambiguities. If paired with offensive systems, they can be viewed as fostering an aggressive policy, and no one wants that. But with these considerations firmly in mind, I call upon the scientific community in our country, those who gave us nuclear weapons, to turn their great talents now to the cause of mankind and world peace, to give us the means of rendering these nuclear weapons impotent and obsolete.…

    • 5226 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scare

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In addition to the reduction in weapons, the number of countries which were developing, had developed or were seriously discussing nuclear programs has dropped since the 1980’s. This was due to a combination of factors that still determine such decisions today, including security, expense, need for status or prestige, internal politics and other factors.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A fundamental component of the proliferation debate revolves around the perceived or alleged efficiency of nuclear deterrence. Proliferation optimists argue that, “more may be better” because nuclear weapons increase the cost of nuclear conflict, ultimately deterring states from engaging in nuclear warfare with a nuclear-armed state (Suzuki 2015). Optimists argue that nuclear deterrence works reliably, thus there seemingly less to be feared from nuclear proliferation and beneficial to a state to…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bibliography: 1. Sanger, David E., Baker, Peter. “Obama Limits When U.S. Would Use Nuclear Arms”. The New York Times. The New York Times Company, April 5, 2010. Web. January 23, 2014.…

    • 1791 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Georges Clemenceau once said “war is too important to be left to the generals.” In Dr. Strangelove, Col. Ripper remarks that now “war is too important to be left to the politicians. They have neither the time, the training, nor the inclination for strategic thought” but Kubrick’s message implies that war is too important to be left to anybody at all. So with the persistence of nuclear technology as weapons of mass destruction, the question arises: Do we, as decision-makers, have the restraint not to use such weapons on one another? The question remains unanswered, but if there is to be peace, we must remain cautious and aware of their implications. Nuclear technology gives humanity an incredible opportunity to move forward, but if misused, it could send all life on earth back to the stone…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pro nuclear war

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages

    “Everyone in the world is threatened by the existence of nuclear weapons. Has anyone the right to wield such destructive power?” (Morality of Nuclear Deterrent) Many people in the United States disagree on whether the United States should keep nuclear weapons. Mainly because of the moral factor. Yes, it is dangerous for countries to own such a powerful figure that threatens millions of people around the world, but the world is trapped by this idea of possible idea of nuclear war that just about every country has on these weapons of mass destruction and will continue to make more to show dominance over the other countries who don’t have as much. The moral factor that is sure to be constantly brought up by many people about keeping our nuclear weapons will always be discussed since the greater damage these weapons cause. For example, when the United Stated bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Yes it was tactically right decision and prevented imperialism from expanding, and preventing the cause of japan gaining complete dominance over the world had to be overlooked when coming into the moral play off of the all the people who were affected by this disaster to their country. These cities where quite larger, but not to big so there…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many people wonder about the future of the world as more powerful nuclear weapons are developed. The U.S. should learn from the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and discontinue the development and production of nuclear weapons because the bombs will create unforeseen damage, prompt other countries to produce…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first reason to this argument is valid because nuclear weapons can kill millions of people and destroy everything. This is true because “environments of nature could be ruined”. Furthermore “future generations will have to deal with destruction and health complications”. This shows that nuclear weapons pose as a threat to the Earth and all living species. For all the reasons stated above the damage done in Hiroshima, shows proof of how harmful nuclear weapons are.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Weapons of Mass Destruction and World War III are fears that citizens around the world are still experiencing today. However, World War III would differ from every other war because currently, multiple nations have nuclear capabilities. The use of these types of weapons goes back to World War II, when the United States dropped an atomic bomb on Nagasaki and Hiroshima. These attacks showed the power and devastation bombs like this could cause. Following World War II, the Cold War began. This was…

    • 4293 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    To be able to make the nuclear weapons. It needs a lot of money.And I think that people might be starving and die because they don't have money.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Do you think nuclear weapons should be brought to an end before it’s too late?…

    • 57 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Regardless of General Grove’s speech to the world in 1962 that the use of the world’s most destructive weapon was completely justified, there are still many main factors which were available to the United States and its allies. This marked the birth of the nuclear age which was to last for decades to come. It brought death and destruction…

    • 2168 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Whilst the atomic bomb is considered as one of the greatest inventions of all time, in terms of how it could protect a nation, is it really worth having numerous amounts of governments on edge at the thought of a weapon so powerful? Ronald Reagan described nuclear weapons as:…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays