There are two core components of ideology in television studies, the first of which is that a society’s ideology contains many different discourses, or sets of views, which conflict with each other. The second component is a look at an individual’s position on those discourses, “how individuals accept, reject, or negotiate ideology.” (pg. 398) An example of conflicting discourses in television can be seen in the show Numb3rs and The Big Bang Theory. In both shows, the main characters are scientists, and are depicted as geniuses. However, in The Big Bang Theory, all four scientist characters also shared another common trait: extreme social incompetence. Whether it was because they used technobabble in everyday conversations, missed obvious social cues, or made inappropriate or awkward comments, every single scientist became the target of a joke due to the writer’s and director’s belief in a common stereotype. In Numb3rs, the mathematician character is shown in a far different light. He helped solve a case that the police could not figure out with their traditional methods by employing mathematics. He was smart, but otherwise normal, and his interactions with other characters was not the source of a joke. The conflicting messages the shows have about scientists lead to a difference in both the format of the show and target
There are two core components of ideology in television studies, the first of which is that a society’s ideology contains many different discourses, or sets of views, which conflict with each other. The second component is a look at an individual’s position on those discourses, “how individuals accept, reject, or negotiate ideology.” (pg. 398) An example of conflicting discourses in television can be seen in the show Numb3rs and The Big Bang Theory. In both shows, the main characters are scientists, and are depicted as geniuses. However, in The Big Bang Theory, all four scientist characters also shared another common trait: extreme social incompetence. Whether it was because they used technobabble in everyday conversations, missed obvious social cues, or made inappropriate or awkward comments, every single scientist became the target of a joke due to the writer’s and director’s belief in a common stereotype. In Numb3rs, the mathematician character is shown in a far different light. He helped solve a case that the police could not figure out with their traditional methods by employing mathematics. He was smart, but otherwise normal, and his interactions with other characters was not the source of a joke. The conflicting messages the shows have about scientists lead to a difference in both the format of the show and target