Shannon Smith
Eng 112
18 June 2013 Obedience to Authority: “The Stanford Prison Experiment” “The Stanford Prison Experiment” was a well-known and controversial study. It took place in 1973 and delved into the human psyche behind roles of authority, and obedience. The setting was a controlled prison environment at Stanford University. The experiment was meant to study the process in which “guards” and “prisoners” learn to become obedient, and an authoritarian. The subjects were recruited through an advertisement in the local newspaper. Out of 75 responses to the ad, 21 college-age men were chosen to become the “prisoners”, and the other half would become the “guards”. This study was meant to take place over a two week period, but was cut short because of the intensity of the subjects’ responses. The results of the study were surprising. The guards who were the authoritarian figures wore identical khaki uniforms and silver reflector sunglasses to create a sense of deindividualization. They also brandished whistles, billy club, handcuffs, and keys to the main gate. These were used as symbols of power to further enhance the guards’ proof of authority of the prisoners. The freedom to improvise and develop strategies for prisoner management. They were told that they would be held accountable to handle trouble that may come along and were warned about the seriousness and severity of the potential dangers of the “prison” they were going to be working in. The prisoners on the other hand were treated very differently. They were pushed to have a sense of anonymity by taking away their previous identities. Prisoners were made to wear smocks with nylon stockings. They were not allowed to use names the use of their personal identification numbers was only allowed. The cells that were created for the prisoners to live in were also barren and void of any personal effects. This made the cells appear similar and almost indistinguishable to the observers. The smocks that were issued were also worn with no undergarments which severely restrained the prisoner’s physical movements. This took away the prisoners feelings of masculinity and made them move more femininely. A rule was instated that the prisoners must ask a guard for permission to do simple and routine activities, such as using the restroom, smoking a cigarette, or even writing letters to their loved ones. The prisoners were in lockup after 10 PM so those who needed to relieve themselves had to do so in a bucket in their cell. Sometimes the guards would deny them the permission to clean them out which lead to the prison smelling, and conditions being even poorer than they were to begin with. This study showed how quickly people can let power and authority go to their heads. In this study the guards began treating the prisoners like they were less than human. It also shows how quickly humans can feel like they have had their humanity taken and begin to behave obediently as if they were a house pet. Over the course of the six days that this study occurred, the guards began to act more aggressively, and the prisoners became more passive. The aggressiveness and assertiveness the guards expressed led to dependency in the prisoners. As the sense of dependency grew more feelings within prisoners began to rise up such as, powerlessness, self-depreciation, frustration, emasculation, dehumanization. On the other hands the guards begin to develop the opposite type of feelings. They begin to develop feelings of self-worth, a sense of mastery, and authority. The longer the study went on the more the gap of feelings between the two groups grew. Eventually the guards began to act as if they were tyrants towards the prisoners rather than just “enforcing” the rules like they should be doing. The study took place over a period of six days because the reactions from the participants became too extreme. That should say a mountain of things about the United States prison system, and even prisons worldwide. When people are given a position of power who are not accustomed to having it, often times that newfound authority will be abused and pushed to the limits. That is what happened in this study. Average Joes were put in a position where they gain the type of power and authority over another human being that many long for. They soon forgot that they were part of an experiment, and began behaving sadistically. This was not because they were required to. It was because they wanted to, and although the guards may have known what they were doing was inhumane, unjust, and outright wrong. In their minds the level of disgust they had for themselves because for their actions, it was outweighed by the amount of pleasure they received from them. The prisoners rebelled against the guards the second day in the prison. Prisoners removed their id numbers, ripped off their caps, and put their beds against their doors to barricade themselves in their cells. This led to the guards behaving even more aggressively, and oppressing the prisoners. Surprisingly according to tape recorded conversations between the prisoners 10 percent of the talks the prisoners had between themselves was concerning “outside” topics, the other 90% revolved around issues and strategies to get particular guards to allow them to do something, and even escape plans. Although the prisoners were like this amongst themselves when the guards were around they became extremely obedient following orders without thought as if they were a herd of cattle. This study should raise some major concerns about the penal system today. The results and reactions from the “guards” and “prisoners” were so severe that the mock prison experiment had to be shut down after six days although it was originally scheduled for a two week period. One of the biggest questions that should be raised is if the supposed “cream of the crop” of our youths change so quickly and drastically, what happens to those who are not necessarily as sensible as your astute student attending a top tier university. The typical guard and prisoner in a modern day prison are not going to have the same morals, or sensibility as one who has a form of higher education. One with the experience of being a guard may argue that it is necessary to become that ruthless, and that it is also necessary to exert the power they have been given to control the prisoners. I personally have the experience on the prisoner end, and it is not. The way the guards abused their power at the facility I was at kept the prisoners at bay for a couple of days, but eventually a few of the prisoners rebelled against them. The abuse of power is only a temporary solution, it will make the people docile and obedient for a short period of time. Eventually feelings of anger, frustration, and hate will begin form. This is when prisoners begin to lash back out at the guards. No human being should be treated like the prisoners in this study were treated. The guards became extremely sadistic in a short period of time, and the prisoners because as compliant as a herd of lamb in the same period. Not only was the treatment that the prisoners received immoral, it was flat out inhumane. The people who were involved in this study were considered the “cream of the crop” of our youths. If they can succumb to power, and the lack of it so quickly somebody who is not as knowledgeable will succumb even more quickly and possibly even more drastically. Prison conditions in the United States are extremely inhumane. The sense of authority that is given to the guards who are there to regulate, leads to them running rampant with their newfound power. In turn this causes corruption amongst themselves, and also leads them to conduct behavior that may have placed some of the prisoners in prison in the first place. Not only are the guards an issue, but prisons are also over-crowded. Rather than being a place to house criminals’ prisons have become a booming business. The more criminals the prison houses, the more money the prison generates. This is what leads to prisons being overcrowded and unqualified peoples being staffed. By no means should prison be enjoyable by the prisoners that are being housed there. But nobody should be treated as inhumanely as the prisoners in this experiment were, or how prisoners nationwide are treated. Guards should be given less authority than they currently hold in prisons. If not less authority, there should be more rules and regulations rather than the amount of freedom that is currently granted on the job. The guards should be held even more accountable for their actions than the prisoners. This is because the guards are still free and are should to be setting an example for the prisoners of how they should behave. All in all the penal system in the United States can use a major overhaul. A better system of staffing is needed, overcrowding needs to stop. It also needs to be looked at from a humanitarian aspect rather than as a business. When you look at something like a prison as a business you begin to correlate human lives with the amount of money that you stand to make from them. The way things are now is nothing better than modern day slavery.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
In discussions of the Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Philip G. Zimbardo in 1970, one controversial issue has been whether or not the experiment should have ever been attempted. On the one hand, Dr. Zimbardo and his colleagues argued that the experiment gave them a deeper understanding of human suffering and a greater empathy for their fellow man (Ratnesar 2011). On the other hand, one of the former guards contended that the experiment made him more hostile and less sympathetic during his time as a guard and that the circumstances significantly altered his perception of what was appropriate behavior. Others even maintain that the prison experiment degraded the prisoners so greatly, empowered the guards to such a great extent, and even affected Dr. Zimbardo’s behavior and mannerisms so dramatically that it thoroughly altered their sense of…
- 1846 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Authority and Identity usually lead to compliances and conformity and these techniques usually occur in real life situation too. To test out if human being would lose their moral and social values when they lost their individuality, Philip Zimbardo conducted an experiment in 1971 to see how readily people would conform to the roles of guard and prisoner in a role-playing exercise that simulated prison life (Zimbardo - Stanford Prison Experiment, 2008). This experiment was called The Stanford Prison Experiment and it was conducted at Stanford University. While the real life situation that was being mentioned, connected and relevant to Zimbardo’s experiment is the Abu Ghraib prison abuses. Abu Ghraib prison was a U.S. Army detention center for…
- 266 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Zimbardo’s mock prison experiment yielded the conclusion that individual behavior is largely under the control of social forces and environmental contingencies rather than personality traits, character, and will power. His findings were shown through the change in the pretend prison guards’ behavior over a matter of days. Their total demeanor was transformed and they became the role they were playing, with tyrannical and abusive actions towards the prisoners. The prison guards’ power went to their heads and corrupted them, much like what happened in the case of ordinary soldiers torturing prisoners. Like the prison guards, the soldiers were ordinary until they were put into a role of power. The environment of the prison with no structure or set rules changed the soldiers’ demeanors and caused them to throw their morals aside for limitless power over other human…
- 549 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Have you ever noticed that certain people act and behave differently when they are with crowds versus when they are alone? Being in a large crowd can really impact individual to act in a certain way that they seem to fit in with the group and sometimes do things more anonymous as it is in a large crowd. Both Zimbardo and Le Bon believe that bystanders are less responsible and more likely to commit violence than when people are alone. Philip Zimbardo is a psychologist and a professor at Stanford University; he researches the cause of evil in people by doing a Stanford prison experiment. Zimbardo states about how evil can cause good people easily by the peers that they are surrounded by and the culture and traditional way changes can affect people…
- 1535 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
The idea of government has been around for centuries. It has changed and expanded so much over the years that certain governments have morphed into a more violent institution, in some cases. Because governments have changed so much over the years, certain governments have slowly evolved to become extreme, and may be considered seriously dangerous in the future.…
- 474 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Phillip K. Zimbardo, who is a professor of psychology at Stanford University, directed the Stanford Prison Experiment, also known as the Zimbardo Experiment. The goal of the Zimbardo experiment was to research how willing human beings would imitate to the characters of correctional officers and inmates in an acting role that replicated life behind bars. But what really happens when you remove the freedoms of human beings and place them in subservient positions and place them in jail cell type settings? The answer is that the mind and physical well-being is drastically and forever changed for the worse, which Mr. Zimbardo’s tests proved.…
- 781 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
A team at Stanford University, led by Phillip Zimbardo, conducted the Stanford Prison Experiment to investigate causes of conflict between military guards and prisoners. Zimbardo and his team were seeking to observe the inherent personality traits of prisoners and guards and see if this was the chief cause of abusive behavior in these settings (Haney, Banks, and Zimbardo, 1973). This study is one that is well know and well-recognized. Zimbardo and his study are often discussed in many psychology courses today, and have even caused reform in prison systems as well as IRB/APA ethical committees.…
- 1783 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Experiments have been done for many more years than humans can count on the two hands in which they possess. Two experiments, in particular, were written, “The Stanford Prison Experiment” by Philip G. Zimbardo and “The Perils of Obedience” by Stanley Milgram. These experiments can be controversial for many different reasons, but neither of these experiments were completed under conditions of normality. The information collected in these experiments isn’t exactly based off of real life situations, it becomes difficult not to question the relevance of these experiments.…
- 743 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Everyday prisoner are enforced to follow law and orders created by guards for prison. Another example, guards switching living arrangements, bad prisoners were put into the privilege cells and good prisoners were into the normal cells. This isolation messed up prisoners head and turned all against each other. The guard had took over all the aspects of the prisoners. The guards controlled prisoners lives such as when the prisoners could use areal bathroom, and took all the privilege from the prisoners.…
- 496 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
When obeying authority one can often loose thought of morals and beliefs. In the experiments the men obey the authority figure by doing cruel things they would not usually do. These experiments turn mentally stable men into a person willing to inflict harsh punishments on innocent people while following orders. Night by Elie Wiesel, The Milgram Shock Experiment, and the stanford prison experiment shows how obedience to an authority can cause people to stray from their conscience.…
- 424 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Fake prisoners and fake guards in a spurious jail is a peculiar way to determine roles in society. Philip G. Zimbardo was the mastermind of the Stanford Prison Experiment, which was a psychological experiment that determined the roles of members in a society that became a fiasco (“Philip G. Zimbardo” 1). The experiment left emotional and mental scars on mock-prisoner lives. The Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE) illustrates the way a person changes when a label and power is all of a sudden given to hoax guards in order to control fraud prisoners.…
- 1435 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Throughout the centuries, both the system and the concept of prison have undergone many radical changes that eventually led to the formation of the prison as we know it now. In the 16th and 17th centuries, prison tended to be a place where criminals were kept in it while awaiting their punishment. It was a place, where criminals were held, rather than a means of punishment. In fact, criminals, at that time, were publically punished, rather than imprisoned, in the most torturous ways such as whipping, and slaughtering. However, in the 18th century, people in charge decided to put an end to these cruel methods of punishing. They came up with new methods of punishing instead of using torture in punishing criminals. In fact, the incarceration with hard labor was the new method of punishing criminals. Thus, the prison itself became a tool of punishment.…
- 625 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Stanford County Prison experiment by Zimbardo (1971) supports Milgram’s study. Zimbardo (1973) experiment took place in a pretend prison house which was created in the basement of Stanford University. This was to investigate the psychological effects of becoming a prisoner/prison guard. Participants in both studies had a difficult time ending the experiment. The participants felt they did not want to appear inconsistent or leave the experiment. Participant’s behaviour was in control by social/professional forces and environmental contingences, rather than their own personality traits or character power.…
- 736 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In this experiment a simulated prison was created where college students were recruited for a two week study and paid $15 a day to either be a prison guard or an inmate. “After a day or two in which the volunteers self-consciously “played” their roles, the simulation became real-too real.” (Social Psychology) The guards took their roles too seriously and “devised cruel and degrading routines.” (Social Psychology) After only six days, the experiment got out of hand and was forced to be shut down. The experiment showed that situational factors powerfully affected human behaviors. This was shown by the many inmates that broke down and had emotional breakdowns and left the experiment because the prison guards took it too far when given a position of authority. The individuals in the experiment were deindividualized and no longer had any self-awareness of what they were doing within the group. Zimbardo’s Experiment clearly showed that “people will readily conform to the social roles they are expected to play, especially if the roles are so strongly stereotyped as those of the prison guards.” (McLeod, Zimabardo - Stanford Prison Experiment,…
- 743 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Correctional leadership and solitary confinement, is facing new scrutiny. In this extreme environment, many prisoners suffer serious psychological and physical deterioration. Prisoners entering solitary confinement with mental-health issues often find those issues severely exacerbated (Bennion, 2015). Prison officers and guards, work in extreme conditions, such as, inmate idleness, lack of privacy, sexual frustration of inmates, and inter-personal and intergroup conflict of subordinates.…
- 570 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays