Preview

Objectivism Vs. Ethical Relativism

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1195 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Objectivism Vs. Ethical Relativism
The study of ethics is a kind of moral philosophy. At its most basic level, the goal of any ethics-based philosophical theory is to define what actions are morally right and what actions are morally wrong. However, deciding the correctness of an action is much more difficult than it originally appears. Nevertheless, there are many competing theories of ethics that try to answer this question and two of the most prominent are ethical objectivism and ethical relativism. Ethical objectivism and ethical relativism may hold the same amount of influence in the philosophical world, but the two theories are complete opposites in where they place the authority for ethical decision. Although ethical relativism provides a subjectivity that can be helpful in preventing ethical conflicts between cultures and individuals, in reality ethical objectivism provides a better basis for ethical decision due to the fact that the theory allows for a strong ethical foundation that can be applied to all possible …show more content…
Ethical objectivism is as its name suggests morally objective. The theory states that moral values and virtues are intrinsic to the world that we live in and they are not dependent on anything outside of the values themselves. This means that there are certain thoughts and actions that are objectively morally right and other thoughts and actions that are objectively morally wrong no matter the situation that the thought or action is presented in. Additionally, this objectivity means that the correctness of an action depends on no higher power, but just is. Thus, figures such gods or goddesses have no power to define what is morally right and what is not. It does not matter what anyone thinks is morally right. According to ethical objectivism, morality is a system of facts that the universe has created for human beings to
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hw Week2
    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hw Week2

    Ethics are the principles and standards that guide our behavior towards other people. Ethics are more subjective, more a matter of personal or cultural interpretation than laws. Laws either clearly require or prohibit an action, while ethical determinations can be harder to make because the distinctions between what is right and wrong are not always clearly defined in such black and white terms.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Examples Of Ethical Relativism
    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page

    Examples Of Ethical Relativism

    Many people are lead to adopt Ethical Relativism because they believe that it justifies their view that one ought to be tolerant of the different behavior of people in other cultures. However, Ethical Relativism does not really justify tolerance at all. All around the world, there are different types of cultures, which have different ethical values that will be correct according to their cultures. Nevertheless, some people might argue about different cultures that have different moral codes that they can not accept; examples: polygamy and infanticide. On the other hand, Ethical Relativism proposes that we can stop the criticism and be more tolerant with other cultures. To illustrate, we could no longer say that custom of other societies…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    ETHICAL (MORAL) RELATIVISM
    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages

    ETHICAL (MORAL) RELATIVISM

    This essay will examine and highlight major details about problems surrounding individual moral relativism and cultural moral relativism. It will reflect post-modern and modern methods of belief in order to exhibit its valuableness in ethical decision-making in overcoming problems (Owen, 2011). In particular, it argues that abstract theories of either individual or subjective moral relativism are fruitless for understanding humans. What's more, it tends to limit humans to egocentric people or hamper the development of distinctiveness through division and relativism.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Shaw: Morality and Ethical Relativism
    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Shaw: Morality and Ethical Relativism

    Ethical relativism is a concept in which most simple minded individuals adhere to. According to definition in the chapter, ethical relativism is the normative theory that what is right is what the culture or individual says is right. Shaw argues that it is not very plausible to say that ethical relativism is determined by what a person thinks is right and wrong. He gives reason that it “collapses the distinction between thinking something is right and it’s actually being right.” Ethical relativism may be justified occasionally. William H. Shaw examines ethical relativism by providing comprehensive examples on why relativism is a weak method in gaining morals.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Moral Relativism Analysis
    • 116 Words
    • 1 Page

    Moral Relativism Analysis

    Moral Relativism is the thought that the moral beliefs held by individuals is influenced and dependent on the culture in which they live in considers tolerable. Hence, what is considered morally appropriate in a single society perhaps is perceived as immoral in a different society. In actuality they both maybe right as they have distinct creators resulting in different laws, diversity, and possibly religious views of each other. Ruth Benedict defends the theory of moral relativism in her article A Defense of Moral Relativism from The Journal of General Psychology. In contrast, William B. Irvine author of Confronting Relativism feels in a few swift examples people can be talked out of their views on moral…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Does Ethical Relativism Really Exist?
    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Does Ethical Relativism Really Exist?

    Ethical relativism is based on society and also individual’s desires. With that being said ethical relativism varies from culture to culture and person to person. Does this mean that ethical relativism is any less of a valid theory than other theories? We shall find out in the next 3 pages. Joseph Ratzinger once said “having a clear faith based on the creed of the church is often labeled today as fundamentalism. Whereas relativism, which is letting oneself, be tossed and swept along by every wind of teaching, look like the only attitude acceptable and today’s standards (www.brainyquote.com).…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Theories Of Ethical Relativism
    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Theories Of Ethical Relativism

    Relativism is the idea that one's beliefs and values are understood in terms of one's society, culture, or even one's own individual values. You may disagree with someone and believe your view is superior, relative to you as an individual; more often, relativism is described in terms of the values of the community in which one lives. The view of ethical relativism regards values as determined by one's own ethical standards, often those provided by one's own culture and background. Rather than insisting that there are moral absolutes, moral claims must be interpreted in terms of how they reflect a person's viewpoint; moral claims are then said to be "right in a given culture" or "wrong for a given society." Perhaps one person lives in a culture where having a sexual relationship outside of marriage is regarded as one of the worst things a person can do; in this culture a person engaging in extramarital sex may be punished or even forced to leave. But another culture might have a considerably different…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Objective Basis of Morality Challenged
    • 1595 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Objective Basis of Morality Challenged

    The origins of morality and what is defined as "good" or "bad", "unethical" or "moral" can easily boggle the mind. It is a topic that can be debated almost endlessly. There are many factors that must be taken into consideration to provide valid philosophies; yet there will still always be debatable elements. Two concepts of morality that are in direct opposition of each other are moral objectivism and moral relativism. Moral relativism can be subjective, in which morals are particular an individuals own beliefs; or, they can be conventional, in which morals are specific to a society and vary from culture to culture. On the other hand, moral objectivism does not leave room for opinions; it reasons that moral judgments are either true or false absolutely. These conflicting views create much cause for deliberation.…

    • 1595 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Compare and contrast ethical relativism
    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare and contrast ethical relativism

    Ethical Relativism is defined by Judith A. Boss in ´´ Analyzing Moral Issues´´ as, ´The theory that morality is created by people and that moral systems can be different for different people´´ (g2). So unlike the universal theory, ethical relativists believe that morals evolve as people progress. Moral or ethics change depending on what part of the globe someone is in. Many say that ethical relativism promotes distrust among cultures and people, since morals are not viewed as universal. People in general distrust those who have different ideologies. Relativist use one of these three main principles ethical subjectivism, cultural relativism, and divine command theory to support their arguments.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A Defense of Ethical Relativism
    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A Defense of Ethical Relativism

    Ethical relativism is the theory that holds that morality is relative to the norms of one's culture. That is, whether an action is right or wrong depends on the moral norms of the society in which it is practiced. The same action may be morally right in one society but be morally wrong in another.…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Moral Relativism
    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Moral Relativism

    Moral relativism is often equated with cultural relativism. However, anthropologists cringe at this notion, as defended by Thomas Johnson in his essay, “Cultural Relativism: Interpretations of a Concept.” Johnson argues that true cultural relativism should not “…prevent an educated person from taking a stand on a variety of moral issues…” (Johnson 794). Rather, cultural relativism is a tool for the objective study of a different culture and leads “…to a much stronger notion of moral values, values that can and should be acted upon…” (Johnson 795). This view differs from Bendedict’s moral relativism in that while cultural relativism is a tool from which moral attitudes and actions may stem, moral relativism maintains all cultures are equal, and therefore all cultures and cultural practices must be tolerated. Benedict is not alone in her biased presumptions. In his article, “In Defense of Relativism,” Frank Oppenheim asserts,…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Louis Pojman Short Summary
    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Louis Pojman Short Summary

    Another issue with ethical relativism – whether it is subjective or conventional – is that a person has to determine what is their primary culture. Culture is made up of so many aspects like location, race, gender, religion, sexual status, etc. that a person could be making a moral decision that goes against one part of their culture but is acceptable with another part.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ethical Egoism and Sentiment: Examining Decision-Making in the Grey Area
    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Ethical Egoism and Sentiment: Examining Decision-Making in the Grey Area

    If there were one particular ethical theory that would universally fit all situations, ethics would be an open/shut case. However, that simply isn’t how ethical theories work. While, some may have significantly more merit than others on a scale of universal application, there are some situations where relativism comes into play when deciphering which theory best suits a given situation. The relativism referred to here is of a personal nature. A person is the sum of their experiences and actions. Additionally, even if a person has a straight-pointing moral compass, these past life experiences, combined with their current situation, can weigh heavily in deciding the morality of a decision when approaching issues that lay in a gray area.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Moral Objectivism And Moral Relativism
    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Moral Objectivism And Moral Relativism

    Moral Objectivism and Moral Relativism Today there are many people that stand by moral relativism, which claims that moral values are not objective. The liberal mindset of accepting other cultures and values leads some people to select moral relativism over moral objectivism, which claims that moral values are objective. Moral relativism is problematic in that it allows one to validly select any moral argument, and ultimately subverts the primary goal of ethics. Moral values are objective, and moral objectivism holds over the fallacy of moral relativism, which undermines the goal of ethics by confusing social mores with morality.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethical Relativism
    • 1054 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ethical Relativism

    Subjective, inter-subjective, and objective claims: A claim or judgment is subjective if its truth depends on whether or not it conforms to the tastes, attitudes, and beliefs of the claimer (the person making the claim). o Example: “Anchovies taste yummy.” (a matter of taste) A claim or judgment is inter-subjective if its truth depends on whether or not it conforms to the beliefs, attitudes, and conventions of the group to which the claimer belongs. o Example: “It is rude to belch at the dinner table.” (a matter of custom) A claim or judgment is objective if its truth does NOT depend on whether it conforms to the beliefs or attitudes of any group or individual. o Example: “The earth is spherical.” (a matter of fact) State whether the following are subjective, inter-subjective, or objective: · “It’s not normal to feel good after murdering innocent people.” (inter-subjective) · “Sailing in the open ocean is a pleasant experience.” (subjective) · “The boiling point of water is 100°C.” (objective) · “The time it takes to travel from earth to another planet, 20 light-years away, at 50% of the speed of light is 10 years.” · “The Mona Lisa is the most beautiful painting put to canvas.” (subjective) Ethical relativism is the view that ALL moral claims are inter-subjective. Conventional ethical relativism, a more specific type of ethical relativism, holds that the moral conventions of a culture determine what it is right and wrong for the members of that culture to do. On this view, seemingly conflicting moral judgments can be equally correct when made from within different cultural contexts. o (Consider the claim “It is wrong to eat beef,” which is true from within orthodox Hinduism but false from within certain other cultures.) It claims that moral reformers are simply misguided and that moral progress is impossible. It claims that there is little, if any, point to moral argument…

    • 1054 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics